GPT Review — Trigger Guard Repair Gate Final

Date: 2026-04-28
Scope: Final review of Opus TRIGGER GUARD REPAIR GATE — OPTION A.

Verdict

PASS with two minor wording clarifications. Ready to dispatch after applying them.

The gate now includes the required production DDL controls: both DBs, snapshots, rollback, SECURITY DEFINER decision gate, smoke test, cleanup, action log, and hard exclusions.

Law / constitutional check

Rule	Result	Finding
Đ26 / Trigger Guard	PASS	Repairs root trigger guard search_path defect.
Đ31 System Integrity	PASS	Guard remains enabled; no bypass.
Đ32/Đ33	PASS	ALTER FUNCTION is gated with rollback/action log.
Đ35	PASS	Governed AI execution, not manual human psql.
Hiến pháp	PASS	Fix root cause; no disable/whitelist incident-only shortcut.

Minor required clarifications

1. SECURITY DEFINER requires GPT/User review if needed.
   If Pre-check #7 concludes SECURITY DEFINER is necessary, Claude Code should STOP and report that finding unless the authorization explicitly includes SECURITY DEFINER upgrade. Current gate allows it conditionally, but privilege elevation is material enough to require explicit review unless already authorized by User/GPT.

2. Smoke test must not leave alert spam or unreviewed rows.
   The smoke test should record whether a row was inserted into public.trigger_guard_alerts and either leave it clearly marked as test evidence or clean it according to the documented policy. Since the prompt requires cleanup artifacts, specify treatment of the alert row as either retained as audit evidence or removed only if policy allows. Do not delete production guard alerts blindly.

Direction

Apply the two wording clarifications, then dispatch Claude Code with high effort. No G6 retry in this gate.