GPT Review — Trigger Guard Incident Investigation Dispatch

Date: 2026-04-28
Scope: Review Opus TRIGGER GUARD INCIDENT INVESTIGATION dispatch.

Verdict

PASS WITH ONE REQUIRED PATCH BEFORE DISPATCH.

The prompt is compact, read-only, and correctly avoids disabling or mutating the Trigger Guard. It asks the right seven questions and requires a fix plan rather than immediate repair.

Evidence checked

• knowledge/current-state/reports/trigger-guard-v2-d26-complete.
• knowledge/current-state/reports/trigger-guard-d26-p3-report.
• knowledge/dev/reports/gpt-review-g6-run3-ddl-event-trigger-guard-fail-2026-04-28.md.
• knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/reports/p9-g6-execution-log-run3-2026-04-28.md.

Law / constitutional check

Rule	Result	Finding
Hiến pháp / Zero Trust	PASS	Investigate before repair; no blind guard bypass.
Đ33 DB governance	PASS	No DDL repair in this dispatch.
Đ35 / DOT	PASS	Trigger Guard/DOT-316 is treated as governed infrastructure.
Đ32	PASS	Future fix remains separate gate.
Đ24	PASS	No label/entity label scope.

Required patch

Add a requirement to inspect both databases because Trigger Guard docs state it was deployed on both directus and incomex_metadata:

• directus: the failing DB for G6.
• incomex_metadata: comparison/control plane.

For each DB, collect event triggers, fn_evt_trigger_guard, trigger_guard_config, and trigger_guard_alerts existence/metadata where applicable. If one DB is healthy and the other drifted, that comparison will likely reveal the intended schema/table/function shape.

Direction

Apply this one patch, then dispatch to Claude Code with medium effort. No G6 retry or guard repair is authorized by this investigation prompt.