GPT Review — P7B C2B Result 2026-04-27

Verdict

PASS. C2B seed + verify completed within the approved P7B/C2B scope. No constitutional or cross-law violation detected from the provided agent log.

Evidence reviewed

• Source: reports/p7b-c2b-seed-verify-log-2026-04-26.md rev 1.
• Seed counts match expected: section_type_vocab 11, publication_type_vocab 1, logical_unit 76, unit_version 76, publication 3, publication_member 76.
• Constraint checks returned 0 violations: parent, doc_code, missing refs, publication_member consistency, doc_code mismatch.
• Content hash checks passed: 0 NULL, 0 mismatch.
• Length flags: all 76 normal. This differs from earlier estimate but is not an error because actual per-section thresholds were not exceeded.
• Round-trip DFS passed for all 3 docs: 8/34/34 rows.
• Byte-exact preservation passed for 8 DDL units and 3 ASCII/lifecycle units.
• Production unchanged: public logical_unit-like table count remained 0; no writes to public.*, dot_tools, entity_labels, incomex_metadata.

Law / constitutional check

• NT1/NT13: PASS. Sandbox remains non-authoritative; production SoT unchanged.
• NT2: PASS. Constraints, trigger hash, and checker SQL prove machine-checkable behavior.
• NT4: PASS for sandbox. CHECK enums remain acceptable only for prototype; production must use FK/config where governance-extensible.
• NT11: PASS. No duplicate registry, no production catalog duplication.
• Đ24: PASS. No writes to entity_labels; label validation remains deferred.
• Đ32: PASS. No APR/enactment was performed; publications are proposed.
• Đ33: PASS. DML scoped to sandbox_tac.*, no production mutation, action log uploaded.
• Đ35/DOT spirit: PASS for sandbox verification; next phase should preserve automated checks and avoid manual UI gates.

Notes

• Report filename says 2026-04-26 while report body says executed 2026-04-27. Treat as naming artifact only; no technical blocker.
• /tmp/c2b-seed artifacts remain on VPS. They should be preserved for review until P8 starts, then either archived or cleaned by DOT/action-log policy.

Recommendation

Proceed to P7C/P8-prep review before production implementation design. The next step should not be P9 or production migration. It should consolidate sandbox evidence, decide sandbox lifecycle, and draft P8 implementation design scope with production-grade changes: FK vocab where required, DOT registration policy, write-path design, and async projection strategy.