GPT Review — P10B Plan v0.1 and Next Directive

Date: 2026-04-29

Verdict

P10B Plan v0.1: PASS with minor direction.

Opus correctly interpreted the operating directive and the roadmap. P10A is complete, and the next MVP step should be multi-document validation rather than jumping directly into Nuxt/product implementation.

Constitutional / law check

No blocking conflict found.

• Zero Trust: aligned if P10B repeats the P10A pattern: discovery → candidate → package → execute → clean render.
• Điều 38 / LSL-01: aligned. P10B validates information-unit pipeline across multiple documents.
• Điều 33 / PG as SSOT: aligned. PG remains the store for reconstructed documents.
• Gate separation: aligned. P10B explicitly excludes Nuxt/KG/vector/production migration.
• P10D defer: Opus is correct to defer full P10D design until after P10B evidence. Designing UI before seeing multiple documents would overfit to D35.

Accepted decisions

1. P10A COMPLETE is accepted.
2. User does not need to review technical reports; GPT handles technical approval.
3. P10B = two more documents, not broad migration.
4. P10D = future product/design gate, not implemented now.
5. Unit-boundary overlay remains a future permission-controlled display layer.
6. Opus's objection to doing P10D in parallel is accepted.

Document choice review

Chosen candidates:

1. Điều 32 — Luật Phê duyệt v1.1

   • Good small/simple law test.
   • Useful to verify pipeline works for smaller documents.

2. Điều 28 — Luật Kỹ thuật Hiển thị v2.0

   • Good structure-variation test because it uses Roman-numeral style headings.
   • Useful to detect whether segmentation depends too much on §-style headings.

This pair is acceptable for P10B MVP validation.

Minor direction

Before final dispatch, Opus should verify exact KB paths, titles, revision numbers, and SHA256 for Đ32 and Đ28 in the first read-only discovery step.

Do not assume these from index snippets.

Recommended execution shape

Keep P10B concise, but do not collapse all phases into one production mutation. For each document:

1. Discovery + segmentation candidate — read-only.
2. GPT technical review of candidate.
3. Insert/render package generation — read-only, schema-adaptive.
4. Execute + clean render — after GPT authorization.
5. Closeout — final reconstructed document + diff/tree/count report.

Since P10A machinery is proven, Opus may make prompts shorter than P10A, but must not skip discovery/schema/hash checks.

Next directive to Opus 4.6

Proceed with P10B-1A — Điều 32 Discovery + Segmentation Candidate.

Scope:

• read-only;
• verify exact KB path/title/revision/SHA;
• query current TAC schema/vocab only as needed;
• generate segmentation candidate;
• include expected render strategy;
• include candidate unit count, section types, parent-child tree, and body hashes/excerpts;
• upload report;
• STOP.

Do not insert anything in P10B-1A.

After P10B-1A report, GPT will review and decide whether to proceed to P10B-1B package/execute or patch segmentation.

Status

• P10A: COMPLETE / PASS.
• P10B plan: PASS.
• Next: P10B-1A read-only discovery + segmentation for Điều 32.
• P10D: deferred until after P10B evidence.