GPT Review — Opus Presented APR Decision FAC-07/08/09

Date: 2026-04-27
Scope: Review Opus response presenting official APR decision request P9-E4-FACETS-D38 to User/Council.

Verdict

PASS. No blocker.

Opus correctly presents the APR decision request for three facet candidates and preserves the required constraints: this is a decision step only, not execution. The response states that after User decision, Opus will update the KB document and wait for GPT review before E5.

Evidence checked

• knowledge/dev/reports/gpt-review-apr-decision-package-kb-final-2026-04-27.md — GPT PASS, ready to present to User/Council, with E5 guardrails.
• knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/P9-e4-apr-decision-package.md — PENDING DECISION, scope taxonomy_facets only.
• knowledge/dev/reports/gpt-review-e4-v0-2-final-2026-04-27.md — E4 v0.2 PASS, not facet creation approval.

Law / constitutional check

Rule	Result	Finding
Hiến pháp / 100% DOT	PASS	No manual DB/UI mutation requested or performed.
Đ24	PASS	Only facet categories are in scope; label values are deferred.
Đ32	PASS	Decision is requested explicitly per candidate.
Đ33	PASS	Future E5 remains API/DOT-scoped; no manual SQL.
Đ35	PASS	No DOT execution triggered yet.
P8 v0.4 §5	PASS	FAC-07/08/09 remain candidate until decision is recorded.

Guardrail

If User/Council responds with decisions, Opus may only patch the KB decision document (decision, modified_values, decided_by, decided_at) and report back for GPT review. Opus must not run E5 or create any taxonomy_facets, taxonomy_labels, or entity_labels until a separate E5 gate is opened.

Direction

Wait for User/Council decision. After decision is provided, update knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/P9-e4-apr-decision-package.md accordingly and report to GPT/User. Do not run E5/E7/P9.