GPT Final Review S191 — P10D Design Brief v0.2

Date: 2026-04-30
Phase: TAC MVP / P10D
Verdict: APPROVED FOR USER REVIEW + IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING

---

1. Evidence checked

Reviewed:

• knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/P10D-nuxt-laws-page-design-brief-v0-2.md
• knowledge/dev/reports/gpt-review-s191-p10d-design-brief-v0-1-2026-04-30.md
• knowledge/dev/reports/gpt-decision-s190-p10b-complete-s188-closeout-direction-2026-04-30.md
• knowledge/dev/reports/s187-roadmap-note-nuxt-laws-page-tree-view-after-p10a2c-2026-04-29.md

---

2. Law / constitution check

No blocking conflict found.

v0.2 preserves the required constraints:

• Design-only, no code mutation authorized.
• No DDL/DML.
• No Directus schema change.
• No governance_docs.pub_id field added without separate gate.
• TAC data comes from PG/TAC tables as runtime SSOT.
• KB remains reports/artifacts SSOT.
• Renderer is designed as generic; document-specific case-dispatch is forbidden.
• API is internal authenticated first because current TAC publications are proposed, UVs are draft/unreviewed.
• Markdown renderer selection is deferred until repo inspection and must include sanitization.

---

3. Patch compliance

The 7 GPT patches were applied:

1. Read-only adapter instead of adding pub_id field to governance_docs.
2. Authenticated/internal API first.
3. Markdown renderer decision deferred until repo inspection + sanitization required.
4. No D28-specific rendering rule; model special behavior via data layer later if needed.
5. Server route owns query/auth/lifecycle/metadata exposure; client only tree/render/sync.
6. Recursive CTE uses pm.unit_version_id and publication membership, not latest UV.
7. PASS criteria include no-hardcode audit.

---

4. One wording clarification before implementation prompt

Do not phrase the Nuxt server route as holding “business logic” in a broad sense, because Red Zone prohibits business logic in Nuxt.

Use this narrower wording in the implementation prompt:

Nuxt server route may contain presentation-access logic only: authenticated read access, parameterized TAC read queries, lifecycle visibility filter, metadata exposure control, and response shaping for the reader. Domain/business rules remain in PG/TAC services and laws, not in client/UI code.

This is a wording/implementation-boundary clarification, not a blocker for v0.2 design approval.

---

5. Direction to Opus

P10D Design Brief v0.2 is approved.

Next action:

1. Present v0.2 to User for product/design acceptance.
2. If User approves, draft a separate P10D implementation prompt.
3. Implementation prompt must begin with repo inspection only:
   • current /knowledge/laws route structure;
   • Nuxt version / directory layout;
   • available markdown renderer and sanitization options;
   • existing auth/session/role mechanism;
   • existing PG pool/env patterns;
   • deployment path under Đ41.
4. No implementation dispatch until implementation prompt is reviewed/approved.

---

6. Boundary

This approval does not authorize code changes yet.

No DDL/DML, no Directus schema change, no production route modification, and no P10D implementation dispatch are authorized by this review.