GPT Final Review — G8B-RP Directus Roles/Permissions v0.2

Date: 2026-04-28

Verdict

PASS — READY FOR USER GO.

G8B-RP v0.2 is sufficiently safe and aligned for Agent execution after explicit User GO.

Important clarification

G8B-RP means Roles / Policies / Permissions only. It does not complete full G8B/P9 G8 because token provisioning is deferred.

After G8B-RP passes, the prompt/design should be saved to KB as the reference execution artifact. The Agent action log will be the execution evidence. Token provisioning must be handled by a separate follow-up gate before G11 if full G8B/P9 G8 requires tokens.

Reviewed material

• Opus report: v0.2 patched per GPT 4 findings.
• Prompt: G8B-RP — Directus TAC Roles/Policies/Permissions Execution Prompt v0.2.
• Canonical design: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/P9-G8A-directus-roles-readiness-design.md v0.3.
• Prior review: knowledge/dev/reports/gpt-review-g8b-directus-roles-permissions-prompt-v0-1-2026-04-28.md.

Law / constitutional check

No blocking conflict found.

• Hiến pháp / User-gated production: aligned if execution waits for explicit User GO.
• Điều 38 / LSL-01: aligned. G8B-RP grants governed access to TAC schema for PG-governed information units.
• Điều 33: aligned. PostgreSQL remains SSOT; this gate does not mutate public.tac_* truth data.
• Directus 11 model: aligned. Role → Access → Policy → Permissions.
• Gate separation: aligned. No DDL, no seed/data mutation, no G11, no migration, no Nuxt.
• Token governance: aligned only because token provisioning is explicitly deferred and not falsely claimed.

Accepted v0.2 patches

1. Permission count is now consistent: 84 total = 28 agent + 56 admin.
2. Gate is explicitly named G8B-RP and does not claim full G8B/P9 G8 PASS.
3. Idempotency/classification is safer: clean/exact/partial/unknown states are handled without blanket delete.
4. Full matrix verification is now required using 84 expected tuples vs actual tuples.

Minor execution notes, not blockers

• If existing exact match is detected, action log must clearly state which objects were skipped as already satisfied.
• If any extra permission exists on tac_* outside the 84 tuple set, this is a FAIL unless explicitly explained as unrelated and approved.
• If token provisioning is requested during execution, Agent must refuse/defer and stop within G8B-RP scope.

Directive to Opus 4.6

Proceed to User GO request / dispatch preparation.

Do not patch another prompt version unless User requests it.

Also save the final G8B-RP v0.2 prompt/design into KB as a reference document before or with dispatch package, using a path such as:

knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/P9-G8B-RP-directus-roles-permissions-execution-prompt-v0-2.md

Then, after explicit User GO, dispatch Claude Code / Agent to execute v0.2.

Agent execution guardrails

If User gives GO:

• Executor: Claude Code via SSH contabo.
• Effort: medium.
• Scope: G8B-RP only.
• Execute v0.2 exactly.
• Stop after action log upload.
• No token provisioning.
• No DDL.
• No public.tac_* seed/data mutation.
• No Directus collection metadata changes.
• No registry/birth/catalog/DOT writes.
• No G11.
• No corpus migration.
• No Nuxt/Pivot work.

Expected action log:

knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/reports/p9-g8b-directus-roles-permissions-log-YYYY-MM-DD.md

Current state

• Gate A Production DDL: PASS.
• Trigger Guard DROP Repair: PASS.
• Gate B Directus Collections: PASS.
• Gate C Seed 61 Rows: PASS.
• G8B-RP prompt v0.2: PASS, awaiting User GO for execution.
• Token gate: still required/deferred before full G8B/P9 G8, unless User decides otherwise.
• G11/Nuxt/Migration/KG sync: not authorized yet.