GPT Confirm — G8B-RP PASS and Opus Next Directive Token Gate

Date: 2026-04-29

Reviewed inputs

• Opus summary: G8B-RP Execution Results — GPT Giám sát.
• Agent execution evidence excerpt from Codex.
• Action log: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/reports/p9-g8b-directus-roles-permissions-log-2026-04-29.md.
• G8A reference: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/P9-G8A-directus-roles-readiness-design.md.
• Tier3 reference: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/P9-tier3-readiness-package.md.

Verdict

G8B-RP PASS accepted, with one evidence-quality caveat.

Roles/policies/access/permissions appear correctly applied in production and the full 84-tuple matrix is reported PASS.

Because Codex disconnected before uploading the action log and Opus reconstructed the log, GPT requires one lightweight read-only re-verify before treating the evidence package as final/closed. This is not a rerun and not a mutation; it is a Zero Trust evidence hardening step.

Evidence accepted

• API discovery endpoints available: /collections, /roles, /policies, /access, /permissions all HTTP 200.
• Clean slate before run.
• Run1 failed on missing enforce_tfa; cleanup removed only roles created by run1.
• Run2 adapted enforce_tfa:false, then created:
  • 2 roles: tac-agent, tac-admin;
  • 2 policies: tac-agent-policy, tac-admin-policy;
  • 2 role-policy access bindings;
  • 84 permission rows, IDs 1380–1463.
• Matrix verification reported:
  • agent policy = 28 tuples;
  • admin policy = 56 tuples;
  • missing = 0;
  • extra = 0.
• Gate A unchanged: 14 tables / 7 functions / 6 triggers.
• Gate B unchanged: 14 collections.
• Gate C unchanged: 61 seed rows.
• Token provisioning was not executed.

Incident assessment

Incident A — enforce_tfa required

Accepted as non-blocking. The API Discovery principle worked, but the prompt still only probed read shape, not create payload requirements. Future prompts must probe or infer required create payload fields for every endpoint before POST, or use a safe dry-run/reference pattern when available.

Incident B — Codex disconnect

Production state appears correct. However, reconstructed logs are weaker than direct agent-uploaded logs. Require read-only re-verify before closing evidence.

Law / constitutional check

No blocking conflict found for G8B-RP.

• Hiến pháp / Zero Trust: action mostly complied; evidence hardening is required due to reconstructed log.
• Điều 38 / LSL-01: aligned. Governed access now exists for TAC schema.
• Điều 33: aligned. No public.tac_* truth data mutation occurred.
• Directus 11 model: aligned.
• Gate separation: aligned. No token provisioning, G11, corpus migration, or Nuxt work.

Decision on token vs G11

Do not proceed to G11 as full P9 completion before deciding/handling token gate.

Reason: G8A and P9 Tier3 treat token provisioning/GSM as part of full G8 PASS. G8B-RP only completes roles/policies/permissions. Full G8 remains pending until token path is resolved or User explicitly amends the gate.

Recommended path: Option A — G8B-Token gate before G11.

Option B (defer tokens until use case) is possible only if User explicitly downgrades token provisioning from full G8 prerequisite to post-G11 follow-up. GPT does not recommend that for P9 12/12 closure.

Option C (merge token into G11) is not recommended because G11 should be final approval/evidence review, not additional mutation.

Index update

Update index.md after read-only re-verify:

• Gate A PASS.
• Gate B PASS.
• Gate C PASS.
• G8B-RP PASS.
• G8B-Token pending.
• Full G8 pending.
• G11 pending.

Do not mark full G8 PASS yet.

Directive to Opus 4.6

Step 1 — Read-only re-verify prompt/report

Ask Agent or Opus to perform a lightweight read-only verification of G8B-RP state and upload a verification note/log. No mutation.

Must verify:

• 2 roles exist with names and IDs.
• 2 policies exist with admin_access=false, app_access=false, enforce_tfa=false.
• 2 access bindings exist.
• 84 permission tuples exactly match expected matrix.
• missing=0 and extra=0.
• Gate A/B/C unchanged.
• secret scan clean.

Suggested path:

knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/reports/p9-g8b-rp-readonly-reverify-YYYY-MM-DD.md

Step 2 — Index update

After re-verify PASS, update knowledge/dev/laws/dieu38-trien-khai/index.md to reflect G8B-RP PASS and G8B-Token pending.

Step 3 — Token gate design

Draft G8B-Token — Directus TAC Token Provisioning Gate v0.1 for GPT review.

Scope should be decided carefully. It likely includes:

• verify existing tac-agent/tac-admin roles and policies;
• determine whether Directus users already exist or must be created;
• assign users to TAC roles;
• create or rotate static tokens safely;
• store token(s) in approved secret path (GSM if available);
• never log token values;
• verify API behavior using token without exposing token;
• action log with masked evidence.

Hard exclusions:

• no DDL;
• no TAC data mutation except possibly a minimal API read test;
• no broad admin grants;
• no G11;
• no corpus migration;
• no Nuxt/Pivot work.

User GO required before any token mutation.

Current state

• Gate A: PASS.
• Trigger Guard DROP Repair: PASS.
• Gate B: PASS.
• Gate C: PASS.
• G8B-RP: PASS accepted, pending read-only evidence hardening.
• G8B-Token: pending.
• Full G8: pending.
• G11: pending after token decision/gate.