KB-575D

UWC 05 — Cross-Source Reconciliation

2 min read Revision 1

05 — Cross-Source Reconciliation (blind spots, numeric)

Reconciliation findings

Comparison Left Right Gap Meaning
DOTs vs FS executors dot_tools 309 /opt/incomex/dot/bin 288 script_path only 119/309 190 DOTs have no script_path; 288 FS files not back-linked. Reconciliation broken.
DOT schedule vs host cron dot_tools.cron_schedule 41 host crontab 49 mismatch True schedule lives in host cron, not DB. DB schedule is partial/decorative.
DOTs vs process candidates 309 candidates_v2 17 292 Most DOTs not surfaced as process candidates.
DOTs vs AX-PROCESS 309 axis_assignment(AX-PROCESS) 0 309 No DOT assigned to the process axis.
workflows vs AX-PROCESS 2 0 2 Human workflows not RP-assigned either.
job runs vs candidates 8 job_kinds 1 verified 7 7 job kinds unverified.
event types vs candidates 52 (7 process.*) 0 active process.* 7 process.* events drafted, none active/bound.
triggers vs processes 410 n/a Components, not processes (FP-risk if counted).
approval_requests vs process 230 1 process class Many runs, one governed-approval workflow.

Reconciliation buckets

  • matched (DB process-defs in discovery): 17 candidate-level.
  • source_only (definition exists, no candidate): ~292 DOTs.
  • process_only / phantom (candidate, no source): 0.
  • rp_missing: 373 (all).
  • owner_missing: 373 (gov_ownership=0).
  • runtime_missing: 372 (only job:cut verified).
  • maybe_false_positive: 981 triggers+functions.
  • maybe_duplicate: IU-command(54) vs DOT overlap — needs dedup adapter.
  • needs_human_review: 6 NEEDS_MORE_EVIDENCE coverage items.
Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/universal-workflow-census-automated-dot-scanner-system-2026-06-04/05-cross-source-reconciliation.md