04 — Information-Piece Content-Map (Workstream C)

Content work proceeds now on the candidate surface — no approval needed (mapping, not promotion). No IU content edited, no tags deleted, no topic approved. Built from live axis_assignment (25 rows / 7 nodes / 16 distinct IUs) + fn_topic_node_substrate.

Strongest topic deep-map — knowledge_graph (STRONG, 10 IUs)

• IUs (10): 09682146, 10649925, 3676cc0c, 57553011, 620f7646, a448e397, a7bba115, c96b53fd, e97fc334, f1273184.
• Evidence tags (10): full iu_metadata_tag:<uuid> provenance (source tag topic:knowledge_graph).
• taxonomy_node / birth_record / governance_owner: null (correctly ungoverned).
• documents / workflows / dots_agents_events: empty (bridge not populated).
• Cross-topic overlap (multi-parent IU evidence): shares 3676cc0c, a7bba115, f1273184 with architecture; 10649925 with dot_trigger; 57553011 with governance; 620f7646 with render_pipeline. → knowledge_graph is a hub topic; architecture is its closest neighbour (3 shared IUs).
• Next editorial action: promote to FAC-08 root (AXR-TOPIC-03); then attach a KG document-template + enrichment workflow (AXR-TOPIC-14); author/curate the 10 IUs into a KG knowledge cluster.
• Review owner needed: GOV-COUNCIL (root) + content owner for KG.
• Confidence: HIGH.

Content-map backlog (all 7 candidates)

candidate	class	IU	shared-IU signal	relation gaps	next editorial action	confidence
knowledge_graph	STRONG	10	hub; ∩architecture×3	no docs/workflows/edges	promote root; attach template+workflow; cluster 10 IUs	HIGH
architecture	STRONG	5	∩knowledge_graph×3, ∩dot_trigger×1	no docs/edges	promote root; consider related edge to knowledge_graph	HIGH
dot_trigger	MODERATE	3	∩knowledge_graph, ∩architecture, ∩governance	thin evidence	GOV review → root; gather more IUs	MEDIUM
governance	MODERATE	3	∩knowledge_graph, ∩dot_trigger	thin evidence	GOV review → root	MEDIUM
workflow	WEAK	2	∩cut_pipeline (shares its ONLY IU d933ec87)	overlaps cut_pipeline	DEFER; decide if cut_pipeline is a child of workflow	LOW
cut_pipeline	WEAK/SIBLING	1	only IU = workflow's IU; token pipeline	duplicate risk	GROUP under pipeline parent OR fold into workflow	LOW
render_pipeline	WEAK/SIBLING	1	only IU = a knowledge_graph IU (620f7646); token pipeline	duplicate risk	GROUP under pipeline parent OR fold into knowledge_graph	LOW

Editorial classification summary

• Strong (promote, work now): knowledge_graph, architecture.
• Moderate (review, strengthen): dot_trigger, governance.
• Weak (defer): workflow.
• Sibling/synonym (resolve before promote): cut_pipeline, render_pipeline — share token pipeline; each has exactly 1 IU that is also another topic's IU (cut_pipeline↔workflow; render_pipeline↔knowledge_graph). Strongly suggests these are facets/children, not independent roots.
• Defer: workflow until evidence accrues.

Key content insight (new this run)

The 7 candidates are not disjoint: 16 distinct IUs carry 25 assignments → average ~1.5 topics/IU. The overlap graph (above) is itself the seed of the topic DAG — editorial decisions should use shared-IU adjacency to decide parent/child/related edges, not just per-topic counts. The two weakest candidates' only evidence is borrowed from stronger topics — a concrete dedup/grouping signal, not noise.

Forbidden compliance

No IU content edited; no topic approved/promoted; no tag deleted. Mapping only.