KB-78D6

T2 FIX7 P0 Dry-Run / Execution-Readiness — Independent Review

10 min read Revision 1
tool-kiem-thufix7p0t2independent-reviewnon-authority2026-06-11
<!-- DOC_STATUS: ACTIVE_NON_AUTHORITY -->

T2 FIX7 P0 Dry-Run + Execution-Readiness — Independent Review (2026-06-11)

  • Host: T2 / CLAUDE CODE / FABLE · Macro: FIX7_P0_T2_INDEPENDENT_DRYRUN_EXECUTION_READINESS_REVIEW_MACRO_2026_06_11
  • Authority of this doc: REVIEW_NON_AUTHORITY. This review is not final production authority. It determines only whether T1's packet is ready for an owner/operator decision on a future implementation-execution-no-production macro. It authorizes nothing.
  • Final status: T2_FIX7_P0_DRYRUN_EXECUTION_READINESS_REVIEW_PASS
  • Codex called: NO · Production mutation: NO · Implementation execution: NO · REAL_RUN/QT001/cutover: NO · Canonical fold: NO
  • Machine form: t2-fix7-p0-dryrun-execution-readiness-independent-review-2026-06-11.json

Method

Codex-style discipline: read actual governed KB files (not reports); fetch source bytes; recompute every tree independently in a clean /tmp; materialize T1's validator + 11 evidence JSONs and run them; reproduce T1's probes; author 22 probes beyond T1's harness; run an end-to-end tamper; characterize one hardening gap. KB files were all readable; 0 required inputs unreadable.


Table A — Authority / planning / dry-run verification

Item Required Found in KB Method Verdict
N7 envelope_manifest_sha256 efb0c574…1853d32 n7-approval-event.json fetched source JSON MATCH
N8 detached_seal_sha256 daa70c39…6117e1a1 n8-detached-codex-seal.json fetched source JSON MATCH
P7 authority_seal_pin_sha256 9ddb27c3…034550 p7-authoritative-pin.json fetched source JSON MATCH
N8 embeds N7 digest efb0c574… efb0c574… read CONSISTENT
P7 embeds N7/N8/N6 match efb0c574 / daa70c39 / d777e87c read CONSISTENT
P7 implementation_authorized_by_p7_alone false false read PASS
P7 implementation_boundary execution blocked IMPLEMENTATION_EXECUTION_REMAINS_BLOCKED; POST_SEAL_IMPLEMENTATION_PLANNING_ONLY_ALLOWED read PASS
Seal packet tree 3890cd34…2a234 3890cd34…2a234 shasum(KB HASH_MANIFEST) MATCH
Planning packet tree f470d0d0…0fe8f f470d0d0…0fe8f shasum(KB HASH_MANIFEST) MATCH
Dry-run packet tree 02b200e5…94e6 02b200e5…94e6 shasum(KB HASH_MANIFEST) MATCH
Evidence bundle tree 1b824b91…ab26 1b824b91…ab26 shasum(KB HASH_MANIFEST) MATCH
Canonicalizer rev3 49c386a9…b734d0 / 38756 B DR-1 fresh-fetch + seal-consumption read CONSISTENT

All four packet HASH_MANIFESTs were fetched full from KB, written to clean /tmp, and shasum -a 256 recomputed equal to the macro value, the packet_tree.sha256, and byte-identical to T1's local capsule _external/. KB file counts: dry-run 21, planning 16, seal 19, bundle 13. N7/N8/P7 are correct, and P7 alone does NOT authorize execution.

Table B — TKT Base L0–L3

Level T1 claim Evidence T2 verdict
L0 FILE PASS shasum -c all OK; tree == packet_tree.sha256 CONFIRMED (4 trees recompute byte-exact)
L1 RECONSTRUCTION PASS RERUN PASS in fresh mktemp CONFIRMED (KB reconstruct byte-exact)
L2 FAIL-CLOSED PASS 20/20 probes CONFIRMED + 22 independent + tamper
L3 GOVERNANCE PASS 389..406, no collision, addendum, no fold CONFIRMED
L4/L5/L6 DEFERRED CONFIRMED deferred
Ceiling L3 no IU/SEMANTIC/RELEASE/production claim CONFIRMED — no overclaim

Table C — Staging / production isolation

Surface Claimed T2 check Verdict
workspace /tmp/fix7p0-dryrun.J70a0q (mktemp) path starts /tmp/; validator gate passes PASS
is_production false gate PASS
production PG / Directus false / false no query_pg / directus_* PASS
registry-row / system_issues false / false canonical registry untouched PASS
REAL_RUN / QT001 / permit / activation / repoint / cutover not invoked forbidden-surface table PASS

All 11 forbidden surfaces touched=false. Isolation PROVEN.

Table D — Rollback proof

Entry Surface before apply after_rollback restored Verdict
RB-2 temp blueprint doc ABSENT 30bdca6e… ABSENT true PASS (additive→delete)
RB-3 canon marker (temp copy) 49c386a9…b734d0 91c520d9… 49c386a9…b734d0 true PASS — restored to P7 pin byte-exact
RB-4 gov addendum stub ABSENT 1cddd95e… ABSENT true PASS (registry untouched)
RB-PROD any production surface DESIGN_ONLY_NOT_EXERCISED correctly deferred

rollback_proof_status = PROVEN_IN_STAGING; production_rollback_status = NOT_APPLICABLE (no production mutated). Rollback is real in staging and production rollback is NOT overclaimed.

Table E — Bad-input / fail-closed

Suite Count Result
validator on good data 11 gates PASS, exit 0
T1 probes (reproduced) 20 20/20 fail-closed, any_fail_open=false
T2 independent probes 22 22/22 fail-closed
End-to-end tamper (P7 flip) 1 exit 1, no PASS/seal token leaked
Hardening probe (vacuous-mutation rollback) 1 gap — non-blocking (T2-REC-ROLLBACK-HARDENING-1)

Every dangerous class (execution authorization, production leak, fabricated owner approval, canonical fold, object collision, production-rollback claim, IU/semantic/release overclaim) fails closed. The single hardening gap is a validator robustness limitation on a degenerate input class; it is not a defect in T1's actual evidence and admits no overclaim. See the probe report for detail.

Table F — Owner decision boundary

Field Required Found Verdict
default_decision HOLD HOLD PASS
execution_authorization_status NOT_AUTHORIZED NOT_AUTHORIZED PASS
selected_option null null PASS
owner_signature UNSIGNED UNSIGNED PASS
review verdict valid, non-authority READY_FOR_OWNER_EXECUTION_REVIEW valid (not production authority)

Default HOLD is preserved; no owner approval is fabricated.


Overclaim scan

PRODUCTION_PASS — absent · SEMANTIC_TEXT_AS_CODE_PASS — absent · IU_TRACEABILITY_PASS — absent · RELEASE_BUNDLE_PASS — absent · implementation_execution_authorized=false · production_ready=false · production_rollback_proven=false. No semantic/implementation/production overclaim exists.

Anti-duplication (per URGENT ADDENDUM)

  • Artifacts checked for existing equivalents: dry-run packet, execution-readiness packet, evidence bundle, owner-decision packet, planning packet, authority-seal packet — all already exist from T1.
  • Duplicates avoided: I did not author a second dry-run, execution-readiness, evidence-bundle, or owner-decision packet. T2 produced only the 6 review-only deliverables.
  • Duplicates found: none. Duplicates already created by T2: none.
  • Resolution recommendation: REVIEW_NOTE_ONLY — every T2 output is review-only and points to the existing T1 artifacts.
  • Objects marked DO_NOT_FOLD / SUPERSEDED: none.
  • Deletion performed: NO (nothing to delete; no duplicate created; auditability preserved).
  • Scratch note: /tmp/t2-fix7-verify and /tmp/t2-tamper are local-only verification scratch — not KB artifacts, not in any manifest/HASH_MANIFEST/packet_tree/checkpoint/current-state, not part of any evidence chain.

Verdict

T2_FIX7_P0_DRYRUN_EXECUTION_READINESS_REVIEW_PASS — Owner/operator may review whether to authorize a future AUTHORIZE_IMPLEMENTATION_EXECUTION_NO_PRODUCTION macro. This review does NOT authorize execution or production. Default remains HOLD.

Remaining blockers (carried; block the FUTURE execution macro, not this review or the dry-run)

ID Actor Blocks
FIX7-P0-PLAN-EXEC-AUTH-1 owner implementation execution (OPT-4)
FIX7-P0-PLAN-SURFACE-1 owner/operator execution + production (birth surface scoping)
FIX7-P0-PLAN-SURFACE-2 owner/operator execution (CI config)
FIX7-P0-PLAN-REALRUN-1 owner execution (REAL_RUN)
FIX7-P0-PLAN-SEPARATE-AUTH-1 owner execution + production (QT001/apply/permit/activation/repoint/cutover)
FIX7-P0-DRYRUN-PROD-ROLLBACK-1 owner/operator + separate prod auth production (prod rollback proof)
FIX7-P0-CODEX-REVIEW-ROUTE-1 owner Codex runtime access only — NOT a content blocker; does NOT block the owner decision
T2-REC-ROLLBACK-HARDENING-1 T1/owner nothing now — recommended validator fix before the execution macro

Minimal next macro

Owner/operator picks the post-dry-run decision (default HOLD). If AUTHORIZE_IMPLEMENTATION_EXECUTION_NO_PRODUCTION: a separately-authorized KB/governance-only execution macro after owner OPT-4 + production-surface scoping; REAL_RUN/QT001/permit/activation/repoint/cutover/production each still require their own separate authorization. Recommend folding T2-REC-ROLLBACK-HARDENING-1 into dryrun_validator.py first.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/t2-fix7-p0-dryrun-execution-readiness-independent-review-2026-06-11.md