T1 FIX7 Focused Review - 08 Self-Audit Dashboard Review (SUPERTRACK H)
08 - T1 Self-Audit Dashboard Review (SUPERTRACK H)
Source: artifact 08 (full read, content_length 1206). Verdict: SELF_AUDIT_DASHBOARD_VERIFIED.
Structure verified
- T1 authors read-only qt001_cp.v_fix7_t1_self_audit_dashboard + immutable export.
- Columns explicit: check_id, category, required_verdict, actual_verdict, blocking, control_epoch, bound_hash, observed_at, fresh_until, evidence_id, failure_code.
- Verdict source is sealed catalog (PASS/BLOCKED/FAIL), "never caller supplied"; NULL/missing/extra/stale = FAIL. The dashboard "cannot grant readiness" - it is diagnostic, not authority. This is the correct anti-self-grant design.
17 checks named, with source/expected/fail semantics
SA01 child set 27; SA02 manifest DDL negative tests; SA03 gate set 14; SA04 NULL/stale/exact readiness; SA05 hash set 7; SA06 hash sensitivity; SA07 bypass set 14; SA08 signoff authenticity; SA09 behavioral capability; SA10 dependency certainty; SA11 epoch race; SA12 Directus authority zero (BLOCKED before cutover); SA13 Directus read paths (BLOCKED before); SA14 Level-B channel (BLOCKED now); SA15 zero-hardcode three-layer scan; SA16 rollback safe-blocked; SA17 Stage 2.6B blocked.
Required-catch coverage (SUPERTRACK H checklist) - PASS
- hardcode / disguised hardcode -> SA15 (three-layer scan); "Literal/manual/dashboard-only PASS is SA15 FAIL" (anti-tautology - the dashboard cannot pass itself).
- mutable denominator -> SA04 (exact readiness) + SA07 (bypass set incl BV06). Covered, though indirectly (see advisory).
- fake signoff -> SA08.
- fake capability -> SA09.
- hash ambiguity -> SA05 + SA06.
- dependency uncertainty -> SA10.
- TOCTOU -> SA11 (epoch race).
- Directus DML/DDL -> SA12.
- Level-B bypass -> SA14.
- prevents T1 reporting PASS if failed -> "reports author-ready only when authoring checks PASS and operator rows honestly BLOCKED; Never implementation/live PASS with any bad row." PASS.
Discipline alignment
Matches the FIX6 discipline recorded in memory (self-audit + independent adversarial sub-check): doc 08 requires T1 rerun after every correction, export rows/hashes/negative outputs, and "Independent Codex review required." The dashboard is the author-side gate; Codex re-audit remains the independent gate. Correct separation.
Minor advisory (non-blocking, fold into CP-08)
- Make the mutable-denominator catch an explicit named check (or an explicit sub-assertion of SA04) so it is not only reachable via SA07/BV06.
- SA01 currently must "prove authored SQL matches the expanded exact 27-table DDL and headers" - this is the dependency on CP-01: SA01 cannot pass until the byte-level DDL exists and is bound by hash. Note this linkage so the dashboard is not green before CP-01 is resolved.
Verdict
SELF_AUDIT_DASHBOARD_VERIFIED. 17 checks named with sealed-catalog verdicts, fail-closed on bad/NULL/stale rows, cannot self-grant readiness, explicit anti-tautology, full required-catch coverage. Advisories only.