KB-2400

Codex Confirmation Matrix (Supertrack A)

4 min read Revision 1
fix7architecturet1-reviewrp-refinementconfirmation-matrix

01 - SUPERTRACK A — Consolidated Codex Confirmation Matrix

Codex confirmation-only review status: T1_RP_PROPOSALS_PARTIAL_REFINE_BEFORE_T1. This matrix reconciles T1's original classification with Codex's response and T1's final refined classification.

RP T1 original Codex response Final refined B/A Codex design edit required T1 implementation blocked Reason
RP-01 runtime instance/result/evidence tables BLOCKING CONFIRMED_BLOCKING REFINED_BLOCKING BLOCKING YES YES H04/H05/H02 hash payloads + doc-09 partition targets consume runtime tables with no byte-level DDL → not byte-implementable.
RP-02 retention authority surface BLOCKING CONFIRMED_BLOCKING REFINED_BLOCKING BLOCKING YES YES "Sealed retention policy" interval/capacity is numeric authority not hosted in any counted surface → uncounted-surface / mutable-denominator risk.
RP-03 consolidated DDL/ALTER + expected-constraint catalog BLOCKING VALID_BUT_NEEDS_REFINEMENT REFINED_BLOCKING BLOCKING YES YES A dropped deferred-ALTER FK is a SILENT (not fail-closed) integrity loss; refinement places the expected-constraint catalog inside an already-counted surface (no new surface).
RP-04 catalog-family enforcement coverage BLOCKING CONFIRMED_BLOCKING REFINED_BLOCKING BLOCKING YES YES Missing reference_contract / operand_column_contract / SA15 classification row silently disables family/type/literal enforcement.
RP-05 item_payload descriptive-only ADVISORY UPGRADE_TO_BLOCKING REFINED_BLOCKING BLOCKING YES YES If an adapter reads item_payload operationally, the sealed catalog becomes a hidden-policy / disguised-hardcode channel.
RP-06 same-human uniqueness ADVISORY VALID_BUT_NEEDS_REFINEMENT (advisory) REFINED_ADVISORY ADVISORY YES (advisory) YES (blocked by others) Blanket UNIQUE(activation_id,human_identity_id) over-blocks legitimate quorum; uniqueness must be slot/scope-precise and depend on the RP-01 signoff table.
RP-07 catalog retirement-evidence FK ADVISORY UPGRADE_TO_BLOCKING REFINED_BLOCKING BLOCKING YES YES The authority ROOT can reference a non-existent evidence UUID → PG-native integrity hole at the most sensitive surface.
RP-08 Directus observation-window completeness ADVISORY VALID_BUT_NEEDS_REFINEMENT (advisory) REFINED_ADVISORY ADVISORY YES (advisory) YES (blocked by others) Completeness must be a sealed/manifest-driven read-contract + sealed freshness field, not a hardcoded observation window.

Counts

  • Blocking after refinement: 6 (RP-01, RP-02, RP-03, RP-04, RP-05, RP-07).
  • Advisory after refinement: 2 (RP-06, RP-08).
  • Net change from prior package: RP-05 and RP-07 upgraded advisory → blocking (per Codex); RP-03 sharpened from "valid" to refined-blocking because the failure mode (silent dropped ALTER) is itself non-fail-closed.

T1 implementation status

T1 implementation remains BLOCKED on the whole design until ALL 6 blocking RP are resolved by Codex and re-reviewed. Advisory RP-06/RP-08 do not independently block but their refinements should land in the same Codex edit pass because they depend on / touch the same objects (RP-01 signoff table; CP-07 cutover).

Note on roles

T1 produced refined PROPOSALS only. Codex is the design owner and performs all design edits. After Codex edits, T1 re-reviews; no implementation, permit, REAL_RUN, QT001 apply, or Stage 2.6B before final approval.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/t1-fix7-rp-proposal-refinement-cross-impact-2026-06-07/01-codex-confirmation-matrix.md