KB-7EDF

T1 FIX7 Blueprint Patch After Codex Recheck 2 - Final Verdict

6 min read Revision 1

13 - Final Verdict

Final status

FIX7_REFACTOR_BLUEPRINT_PATCH_AFTER_RECHECK_2_REQUIRES_DESIGN_AMENDMENT

T1 patched 6.5 of the 8 recheck-2 blockers directly in-blueprint, grounded on the approved byte-level DDL and fresh read-only live evidence, and routed blocker C (the legacy-disposition contract) to the design owner because the approved 27-surface design has no typed home for it and retrofitting it again would repeat the recheck-1 (DDL drift) and recheck-2 (disguised hardcode) failures. No production mutation; no hardcode introduced; read path open; the residual gap is a missing DESIGN surface, captured as a precise amendment with two options.

Self-review against the recheck-2 self-review checks (prompt 1–11)

# check verdict
1 Owner unreachable: qt001_cp_owner not reachable by directus/runtime membership; superuser separately controlled PASS — NOLOGIN + no inbound pg_auth_members membership + Level-B-only SET ROLE; G-OWNER-UNREACHABLE (doc 02)
2 U_legacy root: independent PG-native sealed root; no name/pattern authority PASS — roots = sealed #20 protected_target TABLE rows + #26 protected_target_set_sha256; closure analyzer-derived (doc 03)
3 Disposition: sealed truth table/rules; no CASE/code-only DESIGN_AMENDMENT_REQUIRED — no approved home; routed to owner (Options α/β, doc 04). The rejected computed classifier is withdrawn
4 Operator authorization: typed PG inputs; not hidden in external artifact PASS — bound to #07/#20/#21/#16/#19/#08 + CP-09 + manifest_activation; artifact supporting-only; G-OPERATOR-AUTH-PG-NATIVE (doc 05)
5 Rollback evidence: source bound to evidence_id PASS for load-bearing sources — prior immutable manifest version + S14 snapshot via manifest_activation.rollback_evidence_id; legacy STUB body rides on C (doc 06)
6 Superuser: workflow_admin/bypassrls break-glass/operator-gated, not ACL-zero PASSG-SUPERUSER-BREAKGLASS; Level-B-only operator session; readiness = no-unauthorized-use-path (doc 07)
7 Forward-only: rollback/supersede append-only; no activated_at deletion PASS — forward supersession; derived current-active; G-NOMIXED-AUTHORITY reads it (doc 08)
8 Seal order: no seal before author/rehearse/hash PASS — #11/#20/#26/#27 + denominator authored (PKG-B) before the PKG-C rehearsal seal; G-SEAL-AFTER-AUTHOR-REHEARSE (doc 09). Full authoring completeness still gated on the C amendment
9 Hardcode: no disguised hardcode remains PASS — rejected constructs withdrawn; no T1-introduced hardcode (doc 10)
10 PG-native: authority PG-native/manifest-bound PASS for the patched blockers; the residual is a missing DESIGN surface (C), not a T1 PG-native gap (doc 10)
11 Cross-layer: impl / 2.6B / QT001 apply / permit / REAL_RUN / governance / registry-pivot remain blocked/later PASS — all blocked; further gated by the C amendment + recheck-3 (doc 11)

Why REQUIRES_DESIGN_AMENDMENT and not the other allowed statuses

  • Not ..._READY_FOR_CODEX_RECHECK_3: blocker C cannot be resolved in-blueprint without DDL drift (rejected recheck 1) or disguised hardcode (rejected recheck 2); declaring READY would invite a third retrofit and require T1 to unilaterally decide whether to eliminate the disposition model — a §4G governance decision reserved to the design owner.
  • Not ..._NEEDS_MORE_T1_WORK: C is not a T1-effort gap; the approved design has no typed home for the disposition enum/rule or legacy-routine authority objects. More T1 work cannot create an approved surface.
  • Not ..._FAIL_HARDCODE_OR_PG_NATIVE_GAP: T1's patch removes the rejected disguised-hardcode constructs and re-expresses everything resolvable via approved PG-native surfaces; the remaining gap is a missing DESIGN surface, captured precisely — not a T1-introduced hardcode/PG-native failure.
  • Not READ_PATH_BLOCKED: all recheck-2 docs, prior patches, the blueprint, the approved byte DDL (CP-01/CP-02/CP-03/CP-08/CP-09), the design index, and live pg_roles were readable read-only.

PostgreSQL grounding (live, read-only, 2026-06-08, DB directus)

  • directus: rolsuper=false, rolbypassrls=false, login — non-superuser; owner-transfer + REVOKE reaches effective-EXECUTE=0 (blocker A feasible; STUB unnecessary under Option β).
  • workflow_admin: rolsuper=true, rolbypassrls=true, login — cluster superuser; break-glass (blocker F).
  • qt001_cp_owner/migrator/reader: absent (MISSING_ADD); the blueprint specifies their attributes (NOLOGIN owner unreachable, blocker A).

Boundaries (unchanged)

Official FIX7 design remains approved. The blueprint and implementation-authoring planning are NOT approved. Implementation, Stage 2.6B, qt001_backfill_permit, REAL_RUN, QT001 apply, manifest activation, repoint, and owner/ACL cutover all remain BLOCKED. Production was READ-ONLY throughout (one confirmatory pg_roles read); no object was created, altered, owned, granted, revoked, or executed. The only writes were the blueprint-doc revisions, this report, and the two checkpoints.

Do not claim implementation approval. Next is the design-owner amendment for blocker C (Option α or β), then T1 re-patch against the amended design, then Codex recheck 3.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/t1-fix7-blueprint-patch-after-codex-recheck-2-pg-authority-contract-2026-06-08/13-final-verdict.md