12 - Final Verdict (T1 FIX7 Blueprint Patch After Codex Critical Fail)

Verdict

FIX7_REFACTOR_BLUEPRINT_T1_PATCHED_AFTER_CODEX_FAIL_READY_FOR_CODEX_RECHECK

T1 patched all 7 Codex critical-review blockers directly in the blueprint docs, grounded on fresh read-only live evidence and a full read of the governing law, then self-reviewed against Codex's own 10 checks. No production mutation; no implementation; no hardcode; no PG-native gap; read path open.

Why not the other statuses

• Not FIX7_REFACTOR_BLUEPRINT_PATCH_NEEDS_MORE_T1_WORK: every blocker was directly fixable and fixed in-blueprint; all 7 of Codex's minimum acceptance conditions (doc 10) are addressed; the self-review passes all 10 checks. The two design-extending operationalizations (sealed #20 legacy-disposition row class; the disposition vocabulary) implement Codex's own prescribed mechanism and are flagged for confirmation, not left open.
• Not FIX7_REFACTOR_BLUEPRINT_PATCH_FAIL_HARDCODE_OR_PG_NATIVE_GAP: checks 8/9 PASS — the last name-pattern binding authority is replaced by a sealed, hash-bound, exact-set #20 manifest; final authority is PG-native throughout; G-PGNATIVE + G-LEGACY-TARGET-SEALED enforce it. The patch strengthens, not weakens, PG-native discipline.
• Not READ_PATH_BLOCKED: all Codex review docs, all blueprint docs, the Max report, the design index, and live production were readable read-only; the token-capped governing law was read in full via a sliced subagent; live evidence (proacl over 46 routines, view/table counts, name-pattern fragility, qt001_cp absence) was gathered.

Self-review against Codex's 10 checks

#	check	verdict
1	legacy target authority (sealed/manifest/hash-bound, not pattern)	PASS
2	G-NOLEGACY phase (PRE/POST resolves deadlock)	PASS
3	stub scope (one disposition per object + rollback)	PASS
4	rollback (mixed old/new authority impossible)	PASS
5	ACL snapshot (column ACL + effective role membership)	PASS
6	writer gateway identity (pinned, phase-explicit)	PASS
7	terminology (operator_authorization vs blocked permit)	PASS
8	hardcode / disguised hardcode (no pattern/name/owner authority)	PASS
9	PG-first/native/driven (manifest-bound final authority)	PASS
10	cross-layer (2.6B / QT001 apply / REAL_RUN / registry-pivot / governance remain later)	PASS

Invariants (preserved)

27 authority surfaces · 11 runtime-evidence non-authority · 14 readiness gates (DATA) · 7 hash contracts (H01..H07) · 0 new authority surface · 0 new readiness gate · 0 new hash contract · production mutation 0. Guards 30 → 35 (TEST/VERIFICATION guards only). All hard blocks intact.

Blocking status (unchanged)

Implementation remains BLOCKED. This was a blueprint patch pass only; next is Codex independent recheck. Stage 2.6B, qt001_backfill_permit, REAL_RUN, QT001 apply, manifest activation, repoint, and owner/ACL cutover all remain blocked. Production was READ-ONLY throughout; no object was created, altered, owned, granted, revoked, or executed. The only writes were the blueprint-doc revisions, this patch report, and the two checkpoints.

Do not claim implementation approval. Next after this PASS is Codex recheck only.

Explicit asks for Codex recheck

1. Confirm the sealed legacy-disposition set in authority_scope_manifest #20 (typed LEGACY_* row kind + disposition column + expected_legacy_set_sha256) is the intended home for the operational target — it implements Codex BLOCKER-1's prescribed mechanism but adds a typed row class to #20.
2. Confirm the five dispositions (REVOKE_ONLY / STUB_FAIL_CLOSED / FREEZE_NO_CHANGE / DEPRECATE_READONLY / DO_NOT_TOUCH) and that stub is bounded to STUB_FAIL_CLOSED.
3. Note the honest corrections: live routine count is 45 functions + 1 procedure (not "46 functions"); the law's real §4G is "Surgical Drift Patch Allowance" (governance_change hard-stop) and the law has no "permit" term — both corrected in-blueprint.
4. Confirm the machine-checkable operator_authorization artifact fields and that a fresh independent re-audit gates PKG-F and PKG-G.