11 — Final Acceptance (Track J)

Hard-truth answers.

• Does UI dynamic drill still pass? YES. 22/26 PASS, 4 PASS_WITH_EXPECTED_BLOCKER, 0 FAIL. Layer 1 → drill (count>1) → final substrate holds across all 5 axes.
• Are grouping gaps reduced? YES — missing_grouping 10 → 0. All 10 PXT aggregation nodes now drill into real per-object grouped children.
• Are substrate gaps reduced? YES — missing_substrate unexplained 2 → 0. Both empty candidates classified empty-by-design (NOT_A_JOIN_BUG).
• Can the user supervise PG structure from the UI? YES — including large aggregation buckets (db_dml 408 → 177 groups) and process candidates, each resolving to real PG tables/views.
• What remains operator/authority-only? president PROC-OWN votes (first official process job:cut), AX-TRIGGER owner/canon, AX-PROCESS official RP, REAL_RUN/event activation, UI operator deploy (divergent git). No engineering blocker.
• Any hidden hardcode? No Nuxt business math. Note surfaced honestly: the PXT ledger's PROC counts (11/8/6) are static literals; grouping children bind to the live sources. Residual literal 8 vs live 2 flagged LEDGER_LITERAL_STALE — disclosed, not hidden.
• Any count unreliability? One: PROC:residual_reconcile ledger literal (8) is stale vs live residual v4 (2 actionable / 23 total). Grouping surface uses the live value. Recommend refreshing the ledger literal when an owner reconciles.
• What next? Authority (president/owner) for first-official + AX-TRIGGER canon; operator UI deploy of v2 package.

Verdict

UI_DYNAMIC_DRILL_PROVEN_WITH_EXPECTED_BLOCKERS — structure/UI complete; only authority/operator blockers remain.