11 — Final Acceptance Verdict (Track J)

Verdict: UI_DYNAMIC_DRILL_PROVEN_WITH_CANDIDATE_BLOCKERS

Hard question	Answer
Can user start at Layer 1?	YES — /api/registries-pivot/axes → 5 axes from PG.
Can user drill while count > 1?	YES — 30 drillable nodes; DRILL when count>1 & has_children (proof cases 1,2,5,6,7,8).
Can user reach final substrate?	YES — fn_rp_node_substrate resolves 85/87 nodes to real PG tables.
Which axes are proven?	All 5: AX-BASE, AX-TOPIC, AX-PROCESS, AX-TRIGGER, Process×Trigger.
Which axes still candidate/blocked?	AX-TOPIC (7 candidates), AX-PROCESS (WPC candidates + job:cut READY_FOR_PRESIDENT, official RP 0/453), AX-TRIGGER (all CANDIDATE), AX-PXT (BLOCKED_OWNER) — shown honestly.
Any Nuxt hardcode left?	No business math/counts/drill logic in Nuxt — all PG.
Any backend grouping gap?	10 Process×Trigger gaps NEEDS_GROUPING (cross-axis rule pending — design, not bug).
Any substrate gap?	2 empty WPC candidates (member_count=0) — honest.
Next action?	Implement PXT grouping rule; operator deploy drill UI; president vote for first official AX-PROCESS.

Why "WITH_CANDIDATE_BLOCKERS" not "PROVEN"

The drill UI contract + substrate + proof matrix are fully proven (12/12). The remaining non-PASS-able states are authority/design blockers (president vote, owner birth, cross-axis grouping rule), surfaced as CANDIDATE / BLOCKED_AUTHORITY / NEEDS_GROUPING — never faked.