10 — Self-Review

Forbidden-action compliance (mission §6)

Forbidden	Honored?	Note
Manual UPDATE to pivot_definitions	✅	only SELECTs (query_pg) + read-only ssh (cat/sed/grep)
Governance L2 rollout	✅	gate read-only; untouched
Fake approval / e-sign	✅	none
os_proposal write	✅	ospa 0→0
Event emit	✅	gov_emit 0→0
system_issues write	✅	none
UI/Nuxt/Directus/Qdrant mutation	✅	none
Law/version/status change	✅	none
DOT execution w/o known behavior+rollback	✅	no DOT executed; scripts fully read first
Ambiguous naming auto-ratification	✅	Action B held for council (doc 05)
Local governance island	✅	no forked table; health view held; AD-9=0
Claim prod gap=0	✅	gap=210 reported throughout; AD-7 banner
Clone result as prod truth	✅	all facts from live directus; no clone used
Hardcoded cleanup not mappable to L1	✅	every action maps to FAC-02 / entity_species

What went right

• The "inspect, don't guess" rule paid off decisively. Reading the actual dot/bin scripts overturned the prior intent-level packet: dot-pivot-declare is INSERT-only, so Actions A/B were never executable. Guessing would have led to a no-op or, worse, a destructive retire+recreate.
• Zero production mutation; entry==exit fingerprint proven.
• Anti-drift suite validated against live prod (not just authored).
• Naming decisions correctly escalated, not self-ratified.

Honest limitations / risks

• Action A/B not executed — by necessity (no tool), not by choice. The macro converts "execute cleanup" into "the cleanup is blocked by a precisely-named, buildable tool gap," which is the truthful state.
• dot-pivot-update is proposed, untested. It is not registered and not run. Its trigger-safety claim (UPDATE fires only the refresh trigger for matrix_spec-NULL rows) is derived from the trigger definitions, not from an execution test. The next macro must --dry-run then verify on first real run.
• Fingerprint method differs from the prior macro's (5a060f…). That is a method difference (this macro uses whole-row ::text md5), not a data change; proven by entry==exit equality within this macro. Future macros should reuse the F1 method in sql/04_* for continuity.
• Health view held, so the dashboard is currently the inline AD query, not a named view. Acceptable; apply on owner-go.
• PIV-021 / PIV-016 domain (Group 3/2) and the workflow-family label are genuinely semantic — recommendations only.

Did I create a governance island? No.

The only live RP-classification object is the prior mapping view, which joins governed truth (entity_species, taxonomy FAC-02) and copies nothing. AD-9 island scan = 0. The held health view also only reads governed truth.

Completion self-grade

PARTIAL (PASS on objectives A,B,D,E,F,G + state + preflight + publish; C correctly held with exact reason and packaged unblock). No forbidden action occurred; view and base-table integrity intact.