01 — Authority Artifact Scan (Branch A)

Goal: determine whether any human/sovereign/council activation can lawfully execute now. Method: KB semantic search (Incomex_KB) + live governance-state introspection (query_pg, context_pack_readonly). Verdict: all four authority artifacts NOT_FOUND → no activation executes; produce final packets.

1. Classification table

Gate	Authority artifact required	KB evidence	Live evidence	Classification
G1	Đ32 review_decision cross-sign ≥2 certifying field/input_form/tier births + CR enacting-law clause (Đ0-G/36/37)	Only activation packs / drafts found (closure doc06, human-activation doc01); no minted decision	field_registry/input_form_registry/tier_registry = NULL; 0 CR meta codes (FIELD-/FORM-/TIER-); managed_meta=149 (no CR rows)	NOT_FOUND
G2	Đ37-H human-org-role law enactment (staff/dept_lead/super_admin × verbs + Directus policy)	Only draft / review-ready law packs (multiple campaigns)	governance_registry = 9 rows, all council/system/factory; 0 human-org rows	NOT_FOUND
G3	Production review_decision governance authority (approve-capable path, cross-sign, manifest binding)	Only authority-pack / proposal-only builder specs; test builder is approve-incapable	Production review_decision/manifest_envelope in privilege-walled cutter_governance (invisible to readonly); only fn_iu_test_review_decision_create visible	NOT_FOUND
G4	factory draft→active flip approval (depends on G1+G2)	Only packets; G4 doc explicitly "hard gate remains human"	4 factory rows status='draft' (GOV-MOW/MOT/MOIT/MOUT)	NOT_FOUND

2. Why NOT_FOUND is the correct (not pessimistic) reading

• No mechanism exists for the agent to create a valid Đ32 decision: production review_decision lives in a schema the read role cannot see and the write role would have to mint inside — and minting an approve verdict by an automated_agent is forbidden by construction (G3 proposal-only builder is approve-incapable; Đ32 approve reserved for human/council/sovereign with ≥2 cross-signs, proposer≠signer1≠signer2).
• The CR enacting-law clause is a law artifact — enactment is human/sovereign-only (forbidden for agent).
• Therefore NOT_FOUND here is a structural result, not a search miss. Re-running the scan cannot flip it; only a human/sovereign session can produce the artifacts.

3. Default decision applied

Per mission §3 default: NOT_FOUND ⇒ do not execute that activation; produce final human packet. All four branches B/C/D/E therefore deliver final packets (docs 02–05). No self-approval, no law enactment, no draft→active flip occurred or was attempted.

4. What WOULD constitute FOUND_VALID (acceptance contract for the next session)

• G1 FOUND_VALID: a committed enacting-law clause for the Candidate Registry family AND ≥2 cross-signed Đ32 review_decision rows in cutter_governance binding the three birth manifests, signers ∈ human/council/sovereign, proposer∉signers.
• G2 FOUND_VALID: Đ37-H enacted (law file revision + council/sovereign approval record) AND human-org rows present in the role substrate (governance_registry or dedicated registry per the law's chosen home).
• G3 FOUND_VALID: an approve-capable production review_decision builder deployed in cutter_governance with the no-agent-approve guard, queue, and manifest binding active, authorized by council.
• G4 FOUND_VALID: G1+G2 live AND a flip-authorizing decision; only then may MOW/MOT/MOIT/MOUT go draft→active.

Until each contract is met, the corresponding gate stays human-pending and the agent stops at the packet boundary.