T2 RP Count Reliability Audit — 00 Readme First
Terminal 2 — Registries-Pivot Count Reliability & Bug Audit (2026-06-05)
Auditor: Terminal 2 (parallel, READ-ONLY). Scope: Whole Registries-Pivot count chain — base pivots, AX-TOPIC, AX-PROCESS, AX-TRIGGER, Process×Trigger, DOT/tools, aggregate pivots, final substrate, adapter coverage, UI contract. Core question: Are the things Registries-Pivot counts actually counted correctly, from trustworthy sources, without duplicate/missing/stale/hardcoded/blind-spot errors?
Read-only confirmation
NO mutation to DB, filesystem, UI, Git, approvals, owners, events, REAL_RUN, source IU, or KB source content. Only audit docs under this report path + the checkpoint were written. All DB access via query_pg (read-only role, READ ONLY txn, 5s timeout, LIMIT 500) against the directus database.
Where the system actually lives (corrects a common assumption)
The Registries-Pivot system is in the directus Postgres database (public schema, 225 pivot/axis/wf/dot objects), NOT in workflow or incomex_metadata. query_pg allowed DBs: directus, incomex_metadata, workflow. dot_config is a native BASE TABLE in directus and a FOREIGN (FDW) table in incomex_metadata.
Headline verdict
RP_COUNTS_RELIABLE_AND_HONESTLY_LABELED_FOR_DB_NATIVE_DATA; PARTIAL_FOR_HOST_AND_KB_LAYERS.
- Every internal count chain audited reconciles exactly (topic 7→25, process 19→143, trigger 7→525, drill children, aggregate pivots → live source).
- Counts are LIVE-computed in the views (verified: PIV-019 = live
birth_registry1,194,844; PIV-007 = livedot_tools309; PIV-311 = liveinformation_unit219; PIV-313 = livesystem_issues(open)220,170). - No TRUE_BUG producing a silently-wrong count was found. Every divergence is surfaced via a
warning_flags/drift_status/detector_status/coverage_statuscolumn. - Real weaknesses are adapter blind spots (host crontab/systemd/fs scripts/KB SOP), DOT registry↔filesystem reconciliation, and the fact that nothing is officialized (all CANDIDATE — correct, owner/president-blocked, not a bug).
Overall reliability score: 76 / 100
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Base RP layer | 83 |
| AX-TOPIC | 80 |
| AX-PROCESS | 74 |
| AX-TRIGGER | 78 |
| Process×Trigger | 80 |
| DOT/tool inventory | 68 |
| IU/document/system-issue pivots | 82 |
| Final substrate | 80 |
| Adapter/source coverage | 62 |
| UI contract readiness | 80 |
| Overall | 76 |
Document map
- 01 base RP count reliability
- 02 topic axis reliability
- 03 process axis reliability
- 04 trigger axis reliability
- 05 process×trigger reliability
- 06 dot/tool count reliability
- 07 aggregate pivots reliability
- 08 adapter/source coverage
- 09 ui contract risk
- 10 bugs/gaps and priorities
- 11 final summary
All numbers in these docs are LIVE as of 2026-06-05 ~02:36 UTC.