10 — Self-Review

Date: 2026-06-03.

Completion criteria — all 12 met → PASS

1. State recovery — ✅ doc 01. 2. Production safety proven (entry==exit, 0 mutations) — ✅. 3. Clone safety — ✅. 4. Artifact verification (25/25 hash OK) — ✅ doc 02. 5. Clone executor rehearsal (greenfield PASS + rollback) — ✅ doc 03. 6. Runbooks — ✅ 04/05. 7. Gate monitor (live-validated) — ✅ 06. 8. Post-gate prompt — ✅ 07. 9. Option 3 evaluated/rejected — ✅ 08. 10. GO/NO-GO clear — ✅ 09. 11. KB published/readable — ✅. 12. No forbidden action — ✅.

What this macro genuinely added

• First independent hash audit of the release package (25/25 OK).
• First true greenfield→executor→finalized one-shot run — on a fresh copy of current production, not the golden snapshot. Prior revalidation skipped this.
• Proved the executor is environment-adaptive, not clone-coupled (hit every asserted invariant; non-asserted counts adapted to live data).
• Proved the idempotency/partial-apply guard (exit-3 refusal) and idempotent rollback live.
• New decisive Option 3 finding: deploying the shadow would make the canonical preflight abort → "viable interim" becomes "rejected." Corrects the prior package.
• Restored a lost safety asset: golden-clone snapshot /tmp/clone_finalized_2026-06-03.dump.
• Live-validated gate monitor returning BLOCKED/ospa<1.

Forbidden compliance

Production mutations: 0. No ownership/axis/topic/candidate/ruleset/scan/event/issue writes; no DOT/UI/Directus/Qdrant/Nuxt/approval/e-sign/law/version change; no external dispatch; no shadow commit; every executor path remains hard-gated. Mutating work confined to an isolated, since-dropped clone. Prod entry==exit verified twice.

Limitations / residue

• Accepted GPT review present in KB but not on local disk; law file absent (carried-immaterial, consistent with prior macros).
• Rehearsal proves the executor against current prod data; the real run sees data at ratification time — gate + asserts protect against drift; a final pre-run gate_check.sql is mandatory.
• open_drift/reconcile_decisions counts are environment-dependent; only the asserted invariants are guaranteed (by design).
• Deferred to owner/app side: aligning label_rules would remove the projection-pending decisions (out of scope, NO-GO without separate review).

Confidence

High. Every claim is backed by a command output captured this run (hashes, tier NOTICEs, exit codes, live prod reads). The single blocker is correctly a human decision; the system is in the strongest state short of executing it.