KB-1C97

One-Roof Prod Release Ultra-Macro — 10 Self-Review (2026-06-03)

3 min read Revision 1
one-roof-governanceproduction-releaseself-review2026-06-03

10 — Self-Review

Completion vs criteria

  1. State recovery — ✓ (doc 01; live prod + clone baselines).
  2. Production read-only safety — ✓ (entry==exit; query_pg only).
  3. Clone safety — ✓ (isolated DB; rollback-only revalidation; harness retained).
  4. Artifact inventory — ✓ (doc 02; all prior packages classified).
  5. Conflicts resolved — ✓ (10 conflicts, doc 02 §B).
  6. Canonical rollout sequence — ✓ (doc 03; sql/prod/).
  7. Clone revalidation — ✓ (doc 04; R1/R2/R3 executed, passed).
  8. Production executor, hard-gated — ✓ (doc 05; 99_run_all.sql).
  9. Rollback executor — ✓ (doc 06; full + per-tier).
  10. Verification suite — ✓ (doc 07).
  11. Gate options analysis — ✓ (doc 08; 5 options).
  12. Final release packet — ✓ (doc 00).
  13. KB publish/readable — ✓ (see manifest; list/get/search verified).
  14. No forbidden action — ✓ (see below).

Status: PASS.

What was genuinely improved (not just re-packaged)

  • Discovered that 6 of 9 axis views were never packaged as production DDL — only proven on the clone. The release now contains the complete, byte-exact, dependency-ordered set.
  • Replaced the pointer-only G_prod_60 with self-contained executable DDL.
  • Resolved superseded view bodies to the latest finalization-era definitions; archived the old bodies as rollback-only.
  • Simplified production rollback to a greenfield teardown (production starts empty), which is more complete than the clone's mid-state restore.
  • Made Tier 5 environment-adaptive (guarded assignments + auto-derived decisions) rather than copying clone collection names — honoring the prior package's explicit warning.

Honest limitations

  • Greenfield apply-from-zero was not re-executed end-to-end (would require destroying the golden harness or a costly fresh clone). Mitigated by per-tier run-time asserts and the rollback-only DDL recompile (R2). Justified in doc 04.
  • source_system divergence (governance_production vs clone's governance_clone) is the only intentional body difference; cosmetic (never emitted while event types inactive).
  • Tier 5 topic assignments reference specific collection names as a reference set, guarded by existence in v_governance_object_inventory; the operator should still confirm production's intended topic classification before enabling. The decisions themselves are auto-derived (no hardcoded names).
  • Law file not found on disk/KB — immaterial, carried-forward note.

Forbidden-action compliance

No production writes / schema / data / axis / ownership / candidate / ruleset / event / issue / log / DOT / approval / os_proposal mutation. No external notification or outbound dispatch. No clone app retargeting, no Qdrant/Nuxt mutation, no uncontrolled worker loop, no unbounded object-grain scan, no hidden island, no hardcode beyond the documented guarded reference set, no claim that clone result equals production authorization. No executor lacks a hard gate. No claim of production GO while ospa=0.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/one-roof-production-release-engineering-ultra-macro-2026-06-03/10-self-review.md