KB-5592

12 — Self-Review — PASS (Phase-1 Test-Mode Build, 2026-06-02)

3 min read Revision 1
one-roof-governancephase1test-mode-buildself-review2026-06-02

12 — Self-Review

# Criterion Verdict Evidence
1 Test-mode authority documented doc 00 §0.3 (owner's explicit delegation; reversible+internal clears confirm-first bar)
2 Live preflight complete (Hard Gate 0) doc 01 (channel, backup, object state, counts, trigger analysis, worker check)
3 ≥ SB-0 built + verified doc 03 — and in fact 7/7 areas built
4 Every committed step within authorized scope only SB-0/1/12/13/10/11/2 objects + legitimate seeds
5 Every committed step verified post-COMMIT docs 03-08 + doc 09 (independent channel)
6 No out-of-scope mutation doc 09 §9.3 — appr/votes/osprop/outbox/relations Δ=0; only intended birth(+8)+guard-audit(+1)
7 No production activation all tables empty/inactive; verifier=0; SB-11 active=false
8 Rollback readiness documented doc 10 (6 scripts + backup + drop order)
9 Final state clear doc 11
10 F-83-1 fix applied + verified before vocab insert doc 08 (Phase-A proof; atomic CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER; birth_null=0)
11 handler_ref fail-closed / no approval rows by SB-1 8 rows unimplemented; appr=211 unchanged
12 No hardcode / no island vocab=rows; FKs→live registries; quorum recompute mirrors live fn_apr_quorum_check
13 No claim ratification is solved doc 00 §0.2, doc 11 §11.2

12.1 Honest limitations

  • SB-10 auxiliaries (candidate_scan_run, governance_candidate_object) and SB-2 recursive inheritance views (v_object_owner_gap + inheritance walk) were deferred, not built — exact literal DDL was not retrievable at commit-fidelity, and improvising onto a live DB was declined per the no-improvise discipline. Documented in docs 02/05/07/11. The keystone governance_candidate_state and direct-ownership v_object_effective_owner ARE committed and correct.
  • The SB-1 trigger fix is the one production-shared change; it is a strict repair (atomic, reversible, shared function untouched) and is the only change with a side-effect beyond the new substrate (+8 birth rows, +1 guard-audit row), both intended/benign and documented.
  • This build is test-mode scaffolding on the production DB; it does not and cannot substitute for the human L2+L4 ratification.

12.2 Overall

PASS. Maximum useful test substrate reached safely: 7/7 authorized areas committed, every step rehearsed-then-verified, zero out-of-scope/forbidden mutation, full rollback readiness, and the long-term governance gate explicitly preserved (not claimed solved).

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/one-roof-phase1-test-mode-build-2026-06-02/12-self-review.md