10 — Self-Review

Completion criteria (mission §6)

#	Criterion	Status
1	State recovery complete	✅ docs reconciled + live recheck (doc 00)
2	Live preflight complete	✅ 25 gates (doc 01)
3	Large ownership rehearsal completed or safely blocked	✅ PASS, 210→0 (doc 02)
4	Scanner query path concrete + tested ≥ read-only	✅ read-only + rollback-only (doc 03)
5	Persistent seed decision explicit; if committed, verified+staged	✅ explicit NO + readiness packet (doc 04)
6	Issue/event/log boundary concrete	✅ read-only payload shaping (doc 05)
7	Axis/object-grain boundary explicit	✅ both NO-GO, quantified (doc 06)
8	Activation matrix complete	✅ 22 rows (doc 07)
9	No unsafe mutation occurred	✅ entry==exit, 2 channels
10	KB package published + verified	✅ see below
11	Next macro clear	✅ doc 09

Result: PASS.

Forbidden-compliance audit

No COMMIT · no production activation · no worker/scanner loop · no backfill · no event emit · no system_issues write · no notification · no DOT · no handler · no UI/Nuxt · no Directus/Qdrant mutation · no os_proposal_approvals/approval/e-sign · no law change · no object-grain scan · no hidden island · no hardcode. All held.

Honest limitations / things a reviewer should double-check

• Sequence residue: governance_object_ownership_id_seq advanced (~to 64) from the rolled-back inserts. Cosmetic; no rows. Disclosed (doc 02/08).
• birth_registry drift: 1,079,562 (F-5) → 1,084,816 now (+5,254). This is organic system traffic, not ours — our work was rollback-only with ownership entry==exit=0. Flagged so it is not mis-read as a side effect.
• Missing-on-disk (immaterial, carried from prior runs): the mission-named GPT F-5 review file and prompt-muc-tieu-mo-for-claude-code.md law file are absent; binding constraints were taken from the mission text inline.
• Test-mode-commit permission unused: I evaluated it seriously (doc 04) and declined because every Phase-1 candidate is also ratify-gated. A reviewer who disagrees should note the disagreement is about policy (is an unratified tiny owner seed acceptable?), not about safety mechanics (the seed is provably reversible). My read of the project's 15-session sovereign gate is that it is not.
• conflict_issue_template is structural only (0 live conflicts), because the unique index makes conflicts unreachable at the write layer — correct, but means that payload shape is unexercised against real data.

KB publication verification

All 11 docs + 2 SQL artifacts uploaded to KB (status=created, revision 1 each). Verified via list_documents (count), get_document (doc 00 retrievable), and search_knowledge (semantic recall of this package). Executed verification counts are recorded in the run's final response and confirm the package is NOT FS-only.