09 — Self-Review

Completion criteria (§7): 1 State recovery ✓ (00). 2 Preflight 16/16 ✓ (01). 3 Runs in BEGIN..ROLLBACK ✓ (02/06). 4 No COMMIT ✓ (no COMMIT in script; rollback verified). 5 Direct coverage ✓ (03). 6 Inherited coverage ✓ (03). 7 Missing gap ✓ (03/04). 8 Gap math 210→207, 3 covered ✓ (04). 9 Negatives 6/6 fail closed ✓ (05). 10 Entry==exit 2 channels ✓ (06). 11 KB published/readable ✓. 12 No unsafe mutation ✓ (06). Result: PASS (all 12).

Forbidden compliance: no COMMIT · no persistent owner seed · no candidate/ruleset/worker · no scanner/worker/backfill · no emit · no system_issues · no notification · no DOT · no handler activation · no UI/Nuxt · no Directus · no Qdrant · no ospa · no approval/e-sign · no law/version/status change · no production activation · no hardcode · no hidden island. All held.

Honesty audit: No false PASS — in-txn rows genuinely existed (own=2, gap=207, eo=4) then proven gone by both channels (a no-op couldn't show this). direct=2 anomaly surfaced not hidden (group self-ownership, excluded from inventory-scoped gap). ospa still 0; ratification NOT solved; activation NO-GO stated plainly — F-5 advances confidence in the model, not authorization. system_issues drift disclosed as organic/not ours. Missing files disclosed (GPT F-4 review + law file absent on disk; immaterial). Sequence-gap residue disclosed (non-transactional id advance, no rows persisted).

Weaknesses/limits: inheritance tested only to depth 1 (real containment strictly depth-1; deeper needs fixtures, out of scope). Conflict tested at write layer (unique index prevents row), so conflict view exercised as returning 0 with live duplicate blocked = correct fail-closed. Single group (GRP-WORKFLOW, 2 children) + single direct object used for unambiguous gap math; full-scale projection deferred to F-6′.

Verdict: clean, honest, fully-reverted rehearsal proving ownership→coverage→gap path over the real F-4 substrate. PASS.