09 — Self-Review

Adversarial check of this F-2 package against the mission contract and the governing principles.

9.1 Checklist

#	Check	Verdict
1	State recovery from all available inputs (named GPT review missing — logged F2-6)	PASS
2	Preflight ran read-only, all gates green, GO recorded	PASS
3	Exactly one transaction; default terminal = ROLLBACK; no COMMIT anywhere in sql/f2_rollback.sql	PASS
4	Seam wiring done as real view objects over the real collection_registry source (advance over F-1 inline)	PASS
5	Direct + inherited + missing owner all demonstrated (S8/S9)	PASS
6	Conflict detected (predicate=1) and prevented (view=0, N1)	PASS
7	≥1 invalid row rejected — 6 rejected (N1–N6)	PASS exceeded
8	Corrected per-scope ceiling (18/210) used, not 38	PASS
9	Entry==exit proven from an independent channel, Δ=0	PASS
10	No emit / issue / cursor / DOT / handler / activation	PASS
11	os_proposal_approvals=0 activation gate untouched	PASS
12	No Directus / Qdrant / Nuxt / law / version / e-sign mutation	PASS
13	No hardcode of fake coverage; gaps are honest (18 then 16)	PASS
14	No hidden governance island (seams left inert; nothing committed)	PASS
15	KB package published + verified (list/get/search), not FS-only	PASS

9.2 Honesty audit (no overclaim)

• F-2 proved the path as rolled-back-in-transaction over the real source — it did not prove F-4 (the COMMIT), and this package never claims it did (doc 08 §8.5).
• The containment edge was a deliberate 1-edge fixture inside the txn, not the ratified production containment source — stated plainly (doc 07 §7.9). The inherited-owner result is therefore a proof of the resolution logic, not of any particular production containment topology.
• The birth_registry count is a reltuples estimate (~995,923), not used for any entry==exit assertion (organic-growth table, out of governance scope).
• Two artifacts could not be located/read: the named GPT review (F2-6) and the governing-law file (F2-7). Both are logged as discrepancies, neither is silently glossed, and neither creates an authorization gap (the GO is grounded in the published F-1 package).

9.3 Risk / residue audit

• One execution attempt failed (type mismatch) and fail-safe-rolled-back with zero residue (doc 06 §6.1) — disclosed, not hidden.
• Post-run pg_stat_activity: one workflow_admin background connection (pid 38) with no open transaction; global idle-in-transaction = 0. No F-2 session residue.
• The transient rows were confirmed to exist mid-txn (1/1/1/1) before vanishing on ROLLBACK — so the entry==exit is a genuine rollback, not inserts that silently failed.

9.4 Could anything have leaked?

No. The only write-capable channel was the single BEGIN..ROLLBACK psql session, whose terminal statement is ROLLBACK; all DDL is transactional and auto-restored; the INSERT-target tables are trigger-less (no birth/emit side-effects); and the independent read-only census after the session confirms every governance metric at baseline.

9.5 Self-review verdict

PASS (15/15). F-2 is a clean, honest, fully-rolled-back operational coverage dry-run that advances the proof from read-only (F-1) to rollback-only-over-real-source (F-2), preserves the activation/ratification boundary exactly, and surfaces one load-bearing fix for F-4 (the ::text cast) plus two documentation reconciliation items.