08 — Self-Review

Adversarial self-check against the mission contract and the governing law (100000x v1.3: honesty, hard-gate, no-overclaim, no-hardcode).

8.1 Completion criteria (mission §7) — PASS 8/8

#	Criterion	Result
1	State recovery complete	✅ readiness pkg 00–09 + F-1 decision doc + law read; objective/scope/forbidden/gates/output stated (doc 00)
2	Hard Gate 0 passes	✅ 10/10 (doc 01)
3	Dry-run executes read-only	✅ S1–S4 via AST-validated read-only query_pg; zero DDL/txn (doc 02)
4	Results bounded & explainable	✅ 3 inventory rows, 18 gap rows = 3×6, all no_accountable_owner (docs 03/04)
5	Entry==exit / no-mutation verified	✅ Δ=0 across all surfaces; structural + empirical (doc 05)
6	Findings documented	✅ F-DR-1..6 (doc 06)
7	Next step explicit	✅ F-2 rollback-only; ratification for F-4+ (doc 07)
8	KB package published & readable	✅ this package ingested + list/get verified (doc 00.9 / publication step)

Overall: PASS.

8.2 Mutation audit

• DB writes: 0. All ~16 statements were read-only SELECTs (census ×3 batches, schema/viewdef introspection ×3, dry-run S1–S4, emit/idle checks). The query_pg role rejects writes/DDL before execution.
• Local writes: 9 KB report files (this package) — the only permitted output.
• No ssh/workflow_admin session opened; no BEGIN; no COMMIT; no temp object; no Directus/Qdrant/Nuxt/DOT/event/issue/approval write.

8.3 Forbidden compliance (mission §8) — all honored

No PG mutation · no COMMIT · no DDL · no temp persistent table/view/function · no scanner activation · no worker start · no backfill · no event emit · no notification · no system_issues insert · no audit/changelog insert · no DOT register/run · no handler activation · no UI/Nuxt/route mutation · no Directus mutation · no Qdrant mutation · no approval/e-sign · no os_proposal_approvals write · no law/version/status change · no production activation · no hardcode · no hidden governance island. ✅

8.4 No-hardcode check

The dry-run derives its subset from collection_registry predicates (governance_role/coverage_status) and ORDER BY collection_name LIMIT 3 — the 3 collection names (agents, approval_requests, apr_action_types) are selected by the query, not hardcoded as inputs. The owner/scope logic is the live view definitions reproduced verbatim. Scopes come from governance_responsibility_scope data. No magic constants beyond the documented ceilings.

8.5 Honesty / no-overclaim audit

• Claimed only what was proven read-only: the path is logically correct and honest; not claimed activated, performance-tested at scale, or containment/object-grain-validated (doc 06 §6.7).
• Surfaced a correction against our own readiness doc (F-DR-1, gap grain) rather than matching the stale headline — honest over convenient.
• Flagged the missing GPT-review artifact (F-DR-6) instead of silently assuming it.
• "PASS" is scoped to the F-1 read-only objective only; activation stays NO-GO.

8.6 What could make this wrong (adversarial)

• If the live v_object_owner_gap def changes, the inline reproduction would drift — mitigated by reproducing the current pg_get_viewdef verbatim (doc 02 §2.3) at run time.
• If query_pg were not truly read-only — mitigated by the empirical entry==exit census (doc 05), which would have caught any write.
• If a concurrent process wrote governance state during the window — the census would show a delta; it showed none (Δ=0), and governance surfaces have no other writer (all inert/unimplemented).

8.7 Self-review verdict

PASS. The F-1 read-only dry-run met every completion criterion, violated no forbidden action, proved zero mutation two independent ways, reported honestly including a self-correction, and ends with an explicit, gated next step. The ratification gate and activation boundary are preserved.