KB-6B63

One-Roof Clone Axis/Topic — 10 Final GO/NO-GO & Next Macro (PASS; prod NO-GO ospa=0)

4 min read Revision 1
one-roofnonprod-cloneaxis-substratego-nogonext-macroospa-gateno-go-production

10 — Final GO / NO-GO & Next Macro

Status: PASS

All 8 clone objectives executed (A–E committed/proven on clone; F/G/H produced); 13/13 completion criteria met; production byte-unchanged; no forbidden action.

GO / NO-GO ledger

action verdict why
Clone axis substrate build (A) GO — DONE additive, reversible, zero-drift, on clone
Clone topic seed + lifecycle (B) GO — DONE candidate→active proven; reverts clean
Clone assignment coverage (C) GO — DONE confidence/zone/quality + 5 fail-closed negatives
Clone scanner integration (D) GO — DONE idempotent, bounded, no daemon
Clone issue/event boundary (E) GO — DONE shaped + fail-closed; dispatch inert
UI/API read contract (F) GO — DONE live JSON; read-only
Production rollout packet (G) PRODUCED — NOT EXECUTED gated on ospa≥1
Production axis DDL NO-GO os_proposal_approvals = 0 (ratification absent)
Production topic activation NO-GO governed change; depends on ratification + topic owners
Production ownership seed NO-GO unchanged single blocker (prior F_prod_* packet)
Event dispatch / DOT / Directus / Nuxt / Qdrant NO-GO out of scope; inert

The one blocker (unchanged)

os_proposal_approvals ≥ 1 — i.e. human L2/L4 ratification via APR-BOOT-AUTHMODEL-1. Until that exists, every production write (ownership seed, axis DDL, topic activation, event activation) is NO-GO. This run did not, and could not, change that — and correctly did not try.

What changed vs the prior run

The axis/topic substrate moved from rollback-only prototype + paper design to a persistent, integrated, working substrate on the clone with: real candidate→active lifecycle, confidence/zone/provenance governance, a generalized coverage engine proven zero-drift, an idempotent scanner, a fail-closed event boundary, a UI/API read contract, and a gated production rollout packet. The architectural question the prototype flagged (how to own non-responsibility axes) is answered and proven: a parallel ownership table, additive and reversible.

ONE_ROOF_NONPROD_CLONE_AXIS_PROMOTION_AND_GOVERNED_ACTIVATION_REHEARSAL — on the kept clone:

  1. Rehearse the promotion path: candidate zone='candidate'approved with owner seed + entity_labels reconcile (hardening pkg §5.5), rollback-only first, then committed on clone.
  2. Rehearse governed topic activation with a full owner set so topic gap closes 0 on the clone (mirror of responsibility 210→0).
  3. Build the reconcile/drift detectors (label_orphan, projection_lag) as clone-local convergent scans.
  4. Stage the topic-axis production rollout (the second G-packet) — still gated on ospa≥1.

In parallel (human/GPT, not Agent): B-RATIFY (ospa≥1) and a GPT review of this package.

Forbidden-compliance

No production writes of any kind; no axis tables created in production; no ownership/candidate/ruleset/event/DOT/Directus/Qdrant/Nuxt mutation; no approval/e-sign/os_proposal write; no external dispatch; no unbounded scan; no hidden island (the clone substrate is labelled TEST_CLONE and DROP-reversible); no claim that the clone result equals production authorization. Fully compliant.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/one-roof-nonprod-clone-axis-topic-substrate-pipeline-2026-06-02/10-final-go-nogo-and-next-macro.md