92 — Final Pre-Code Self-Review

Mission §13 acceptance audit + §15 response basis. Tier: self-review. Mutation footprint: ZERO.

---

92.1 Acceptance criteria (mission §13)

#	Criterion	Met?	Evidence
1	State recovery complete	✔	docs 16/19/27/23-read; 57–81 distilled; GPT direction docs read; live schema/triggers introspected
2	SB-1 rehearsal completed or hard-blocked with evidence	✔	doc 83 — EXECUTED LIVE (Run 1 as-is probe + Run 2 additive proof); F-83-1 discovered + fix validated
3	SB-1 fail-closed/trigger/quorum risk covered	✔	doc 84 — live-verified function source; action='add' bypass; Phase-A non-executability; Phase-B NO-GO
4	Cross-rehearsal evidence review complete	✔	doc 85 — 10 tracks, evidence docs, residue, build-readiness
5	All drift findings consolidated	✔	doc 86 — F-83-1/2 (new) + F-57-1/2/3/4 + F-R7-1/2 + OI-45-1 + 5 live corrections, each with build adjustment/test/rollback
6	Final readiness matrix complete	✔	doc 87 — every component, 6 status classes
7	Final blocker closure ledger complete	✔	doc 88 — per-blocker, evidence-gated, sovereign-vs-council-vs-engineering
8	Final build handoff complete	✔	doc 89 — read order, build order, per-step mutation, stop conditions, re-verify queries
9	Final build prompts complete	✔	doc 90 — 10 paste-ready prompts, each no-COMMIT-without-auth
10	Entry==exit proven	✔	doc 91 — two channels, zero residue, trigger restored
11	No unsafe mutation occurred	✔	doc 91 §91.2 forbidden-action audit all NO
12	No implementation/build occurred	✔	os_proposal_approvals=0; all writes BEGIN..ROLLBACK
13	No small follow-up remains before code except explicit build authorization	✔	§92.3 below

Acceptance: PASS.

92.2 Quality / integrity checks

• No fabricated closure: no blocker claimed closed without evidence (doc 88 rule honoured; M-1/C-1/C-2/C-7 explicitly OPEN/PARTIAL).
• Live-over-doc: every count re-verified live 2026-06-01; F-83-1 found by executing, not assuming (doc 19's never-run script would have hit it at build).
• Channel discipline: write channel ssh contabo → docker exec psql -U workflow_admin (superuser) used only inside BEGIN..ROLLBACK; query_pg used read-only for independent verification.
• No competing package: docs 82–92 appended to the existing index package (now 00–92, 93 docs).
• No-hardcode / no-island: rehearsal used data rows + existing constraints; handoff §89.9 pins the build-time checks.

92.3 Remaining pre-code work (mission §13.13)

None that is engineering. What remains before first COMMIT is exclusively authorization + mechanical fold-in:

1. Sovereign M-1 — President writes os_proposal_approvals for the chosen first step (only the President can; no agent/GPT substitute).
2. Council formal build records — C-2 (SB-1), C-1 (SB-2), C-7.1–.5 (GCOS), as applicable per step.
3. Apply the doc-86 fold-ins at build (F-83-1 is the load-bearing one for SB-1; F-57-x/F-R7-1 for GCOS/T6-T7).

The SB-1 owner-line prerequisite that this mission was chartered to close (the last unrehearsed owner-line piece) is now rehearsed-green.

92.4 Build authorization status

NOT GRANTED. BUILD NO-GO. os_proposal_approvals=0 ⇒ COMMIT_FORBIDDEN. No step may be built on the strength of any rehearsal, this bundle, or a GPT direction. The next legitimate build action requires a live sovereign approval row + the step's council record.

92.5 Self-review verdict

PASS. All 13 acceptance criteria met; SB-1 rehearsed-green with a critical build finding (F-83-1) discovered and fixed-in-rehearsal; cross-rehearsal evidence, drift fold-ins, readiness matrix, blocker ledger, build handoff, and build prompts complete; entry==exit proven with zero residue and zero COMMIT. The system is engineering-ready and authorization-gated: pre-code work is complete except explicit sovereign/council build authorization.