KB-489B

54 — Build-NO-GO Attestation & Risk Register (what is ready / not ready / why NO-GO / GO conditions / re-verify-before-build, design-only, read-only zero mutation, 2026-06-01)

16 min read Revision 1
one-roof-governanceimplementation-indexgcosbuild-no-go-attestationrisk-registerreadynot-readygo-conditionsre-verify-before-buildos-proposal-approvals-zerocommit-forbiddenc-7-pendingg-ddl-not-rehearsedsb-10sb-11sb-12sb-13sb-1sb-2live-verifieddesign-only2026-06-01

54 — Build-NO-GO Attestation & Risk Register

Path: knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/one-roof-governance-technical-addendum-and-implementation-index-2026-06-01/ Doc: 54. Role: A clear, standalone attestation of why GCOS / T6 / T7 build remains NO-GO, what is ready, what is not, the exact conditions that turn build GO, and what must be re-verified live immediately before any build — plus a consolidated risk register. Status: ATTESTATION / CONTROL DOCUMENT ONLY. Zero mutation. The attestation below is made on read-only evidence (live query_pg, 2026-06-01) + the design package. It authorizes nothing. Date: 2026-06-01. Authority: doc 49 (gate checklist), doc 42 §42.5 (gate table), doc 45 §45.3 (live corrections), doc 46 (C-7), doc 47 (red-team RR-1..RR-12), muc-tieu-mo §6 (gate-before-live-action).


54.0 Headline attestation

BUILD = NO-GO. As of 2026-06-01, no GCOS / T6 / T7 / apply step may COMMIT anything to PG. The single sufficient reason is the master gate: os_proposal_approvals = 0 ⇒ COMMIT_FORBIDDEN (re-verified live this mission). Multiple independent reasons also hold (C-7 unruled; G-DDL not rehearsed live; SB-10/11/12/13 and SB-1/SB-2 not built; the 10 addenda not applied). Design/control-prep = COMPLETE and GPT-accepted. The line between here and build is human ruling + recorded sovereign approval + rehearsal evidence — not more design.

This attestation is conservative by construction: any one NOT-MET MUST item is sufficient for NO-GO (doc 49 §49.10). Several are NOT-MET; therefore NO-GO is over-determined.


54.1 What IS ready (design / control layer — COMPLETE)

Ready item Evidence Status
SB-1 (APR action-types) detailed design doc 16, doc 23 (C-2 packet) DESIGN-COMPLETE
SB-2 (object/axis ownership) detailed design doc 17, doc 23 (C-1 packet) DESIGN-COMPLETE
T6 (coverage scanner / DOT family) design doc 25 (frozen rev 2 + cross-ref header) DESIGN-COMPLETE
T7 (issue/event/notification) design doc 24 (frozen rev 2 + cross-ref header) DESIGN-COMPLETE
GCOS branches (backfill/handoff/input/candidate) docs 31–35 DESIGN-COMPLETE
SB-12 / SB-13 / SB-10 / SB-11 detailed designs docs 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 DESIGN-COMPLETE (GPT-reviewed)
GCOS build readiness (order/graph/gates/rollback/no-island/no-hardcode) doc 42 COMPLETE
Consolidated build index + docs 24/25 cross-ref + 10 addenda pinned doc 45 (+ headers on 24/25) COMPLETE
C-7 decision packet (5 items, defaults, rejected, wording, no-self-approval) doc 46 COMPLETE (packet, binds nothing)
End-to-end red-team (74 scenarios; 0 uncaught critical) → RR-1..RR-12 doc 47 PASS (design/analysis-only)
Author-mode rehearsal prompt pack (7 BEGIN..ROLLBACK prompts) doc 48 COMPLETE (prepared, not run)
Implementation gate checklist (master pre-build gate) doc 49 COMPLETE
Decision-intake ledger + ruling checklist doc 52 (this mission) COMPLETE
Rehearsal orchestration plan doc 53 (this mission) COMPLETE
Greenfield confirmed (all target tables absent) live query_pg 2026-06-01 CONFIRMED

Net: every artifact a build agent needs to plan and rehearse exists and is internally consistent and externally reviewed (GPT PASS, 2026-06-01).


54.2 What is NOT ready (the gaps that hold build at NO-GO)

# Not-ready item Why it blocks build Doc-49 ref
N-1 os_proposal_approvals = 0 — no recorded sovereign approval Master gate M-1: COMMIT_FORBIDDEN. Sufficient alone. §49.0 M-1 / A-1
N-2 C-7.1–C-7.5 not ruled (input-trust / ruleset owner / backfill ruleset / 60-day / observer) input-gate, ruleset activation, backfill seed-status, legacy escalation all unauthorized §49.1 A-3..A-7
N-3 C-1 / C-2 not ruled (SB-2 ownership / SB-1 action-types) owner-relevant T6 routing + apply DOT cannot be correctly built §49.1 A-8
N-4 SB-12 / SB-13 / SB-10 / SB-11 not built (design-complete only) T6/T7 build requires GCOS substrate first (doc 45 §45.1 rule) §49.2
N-5 SB-1 / SB-2 not built owner ledger + action-type vocabulary absent; apply DOT cannot target §49.2
N-6 G-DDL not rehearsed live (doc 48 prompts prepared, not executed) no BEGIN..ROLLBACK transcript / entry==exit / additivity proof yet §49.4 RE-1..RE-7
N-7 The 10 build addenda not applied to T6/T7 building from docs 24/25 alone would hit rescan-everything + checked-forever anti-patterns §49.2 / doc 45 §45.4
N-8 H-1 / H-2 / SB-6 sovereign sign-off absent the only mutating DOT (dot_governance_assignment_apply) is NO-GO §49.1 A-9
N-9 OP-B / C-5 unruled; SB-3 caps IU axis-grain at 3 IU (T10) / render (T8) / 4th-axis tracks blocked (do not block SB-10..13 substrate) doc 26 / doc 10
N-10 L-1 law drift open; Điều 20/23/44/45 unregistered; enact handlers unimplemented parallel legislative track (not a hard substrate-build blocker, but open) doc 02 / §D-11

54.3 Why build remains NO-GO (the reasoning, not just the list)

  1. The master gate is red and is sovereign-only. os_proposal_approvals = 0 means no human sovereign has recorded approval for any build step. No agent can flip this (no self-approval). Until a real approval row exists, COMMIT is forbidden by construction. This alone is dispositive.
  2. The substrate the build depends on does not exist yet. doc 45 §45.1 makes the rule explicit: T6/T7 build requires the GCOS substrate built first. SB-10/11/12/13 are design-complete but absent live (verified: all to_regclass NULL). Building T6/T7 now would fall into the two forbidden anti-patterns (rescan 1.04M every pass; checked-forever boolean).
  3. The policy decisions the substrate needs are unruled. C-7 (five items) and C-1/C-2 are packets, not decisions (doc 46 binds nothing). Activation of the input gate, ruleset, backfill seed-status, and legacy escalation each depend on a ruling that has not happened. Silence ≠ approval.
  4. No rehearsal evidence exists yet. The doc-48 prompts are prepared but unrun; there is no BEGIN..ROLLBACK transcript, no entry==exit proof, no additivity proof. doc 49 §49.4 requires RE-1..RE-7 per DDL step before COMMIT.
  5. Reversibility must be proven, not assumed. Even though the design is fully additive and every step has a staged rollback (doc 42 §42.7 / doc 49 §49.5), the gate requires the rollback to be rehearsed and demonstrated on the live operator channel — which has not been done.

Conclusion: NO-GO is correct and over-determined. The package is ready to rehearse, not ready to build.


54.4 Exact conditions that turn build GO (per step)

Build flips to GO for a given step only when every condition in that step's column is met (doc 49 §49.0–§49.8). The universal preconditions (all steps):

  • U-1. os_proposal_approvals > 0 with a named human sovereign approval for THIS step (M-1 / A-1). Sovereign-only; no agent path.
  • U-2. The doc-45 read order completed and the doc-45 §45.3 live block re-verified at build time (current numbers).
  • U-3. G-DDL rehearsed green for the step: BEGIN..ROLLBACK transcript, entry==exit, 0-collision pre-flight, additivity proof (RE-1..RE-7).
  • U-4. No-hardcode + no-island checks pass (doc 49 §49.6); boundaries hold (§49.7); applicable RR-1..RR-12 satisfied (§49.8).
  • U-5. A staged, tested rollback for the step (§49.5).

Per-step additional conditions:

Step Additional GO conditions
SB-12 A-4 (C-7.2 ruleset owner ruled) + G-DESIGN(doc 38)
SB-13 G-DESIGN(doc 39) [no C-7 dependency]
SB-10 SB-12 + SB-13 built + G-DESIGN(doc 40)
SB-11 register G-DESIGN(doc 41) + G-RBE discipline; rows active=false only (flip to active=true deferred to T7 build)
Branch A backfill seed SB-10/12/13 built + A-5 (C-7.3)
Branch B handoff intake (Option A) SB-13 built + SB-11 registered (no Birth change; no C-7.5 needed)
Branch C/D input-gate + candidate scan SB-10 built + A-3 (C-7.1)
T6 build (7 scanner DOTs) SB-10 + SB-12 + SB-13 built + the 10 addenda applied + A-1
T7 build (activate governance emit) full taxonomy incl. 19 GCOS finding types + SB-11 + G-RBE (active=true) + A-1
Apply DOT SB-1 Phase-B handler flipped + SB-2 live + A-2 quorum + A-9 sovereign + M-1 — the highest gate
Option B observer trigger (optional) A-7 (C-7.5 YES) + separate build auth + a rehearsal proving fail-open

No step may be flipped to GO by self-approval. A C-7 ruling is necessary but not sufficient — each step still needs U-1..U-5.


54.5 What MUST be re-verified live immediately before ANY build (the doc 45 §3 block, current)

Re-run these read-only at the top of every build/rehearsal macro (live wins over any printed value). Captured this mission 2026-06-01 as the current baseline:

# Query Live value 2026-06-01 Build-time expectation
V-1 SELECT count(*), count(canonical_address) FROM birth_registry 1,042,938 / 0 non-null (all born) still growing; canonical NULL ⇒ key collection_name:entity_code
V-2 to_regclass of the 4 GCOS + 2 SB-2 tables all NULL (absent) greenfield; if any exists → STOP
V-3 SELECT count(*) FROM os_proposal_approvals 0 must be > 0 with named sovereign approval before COMMIT
V-4 event_type_registry governance domain absent (mother 9/0 inactive precedent) register active=false first
V-5 watermark types (birth.id/changelog.id/cursor/outbox) integer / integer / uuid / uuid text-generalized watermark + typed predicate
V-6 measurement_registry total/enabled 142 / 140 exact ruleset-hash input count
V-7 evolution_snapshots 1 reuse target for SB-12 source snapshot
V-8 event buses (outbox/pending/read/subscription/heartbeat) 182,731 / 0 / 182,370 / 3 / 3 zero-emit baseline; event_pending=0 free for GCOS
V-9 system_issues / registry_changelog 191,307 / 68,444 issue store + audit ledger (reuse, no new store)

Drift since doc 45 authoring: birth_registry +29 (1,042,909 → 1,042,938 — confirms continuous growth); buses +~6 rows (normal traffic). All structural facts unchanged. os_proposal_approvals still 0. The corrections in doc 45 §45.3 (canonical NULL; int-vs-uuid watermark; no governance domain; greenfield) all hold live.


54.6 Risk register (consolidated; build-time controls)

Severity: 🔴 build-blocking · 🟠 must-control-at-build · 🟡 monitor. Controls map to doc 47 RR-1..RR-12 and doc 49.

ID Risk Sev Control (must hold at build) Source
K-1 COMMIT without sovereign approval 🔴 M-1: os_proposal_approvals>0 + named approval; no self-approval doc 49 §49.0
K-2 Build T6/T7 from docs 24/25 alone, miss GCOS 🔴 doc 45 rule + cross-ref headers on 24/25; read-order enforced doc 45 §45.1
K-3 Rescan all 1.04M every pass 🔴 L1 reads dirty+stale candidate set (addendum #1); UI summary-views only (RR-12) doc 45 §45.4
K-4 Checked-forever boolean 🔴 SB-10 has NO is_governed/checked col; verdict = decaying triple (RR-4) doc 40
K-5 Emit before register (Điều 45) 🔴 governance rows active=false until T7 build + full taxonomy (RR-9) doc 41
K-6 Key on canonical_address (NULL in all rows) 🟠 candidate_key = COALESCE(canonical_address, collection_name||':'||entity_code) doc 45 §45.3 C-2
K-7 Watermark type error (int vs uuid) 🟠 text-generalized watermark + typed predicate; rehearse on both (RR-8) doc 39
K-8 Untrusted input drives governance 🟠 C-7.1 deny-by-default high-risk; held→COUNCIL, never orphan (RR-2) doc 46 §46.1
K-9 Ruleset self-activation (self-approval) 🟠 C-7.2 SIV proposes, COUNCIL activates via APR; draft→unknown high-risk doc 46 §46.2
K-10 Dirty-group storm on ruleset bump / deadline 🟠 group_key coalesce + group_invalidation_storm ceiling (RR-3, addendum #7) doc 45 §45.4
K-11 Auto-close masks needed re-open under new ruleset 🟠 auto-close re-keyed by (coalesce_key, ruleset_version) (RR-7, addendum #8) doc 45 §45.4
K-12 action='add' auto-approve bypass 🟠 governance APR action='review' never 'add' (RR-11) doc 27
K-13 Second governance roof (island) 🟠 one bus/store/audit/cursor/candidate-store; SB-11 = 0 new tables (RR-10) doc 42 §42.8
K-14 Hardcoded class/axis/owner array 🟠 every literal from registry/catalog/config; missing → fail-closed + finding (RR-12) doc 42 §42.9
K-15 Birth modified by handoff 🟠 Option A cursor-tail default; Option B observer needs C-7.5 + fail-open rehearsal; Option C forbidden doc 32 / doc 46 §46.5
K-16 4th IU axis while envelope is 3-col 🟡 emit governance_schema_drift; SB-3 generalizes (RR-6) doc 47
K-17 Stale printed counts used as constants 🟡 re-verify §54.5 block at build time; live wins doc 45 §45.3
K-18 Backfill seed not resumable as spine grows 🟡 keyset cursor (SB-13); seed incremental; size to current live count doc 31 / doc 39
K-19 Law drift / unregistered Điều 20/23/44/45 🟡 parallel L-1/L-2 human-only legislative track; not a substrate-build blocker §D-11

No 🔴 risk is mitigatable by an agent acting alone — each requires either a sovereign approval (K-1), a build-time discipline gated behind that approval (K-2..K-5), or a council ruling. This is the structural reason build stays NO-GO.


54.7 Attestation statement

I attest, on read-only evidence gathered this mission (live query_pg, 2026-06-01) and the design package (docs 00–53):

  1. No mutation occurred in this mission — KB writes only (docs 52–56); all PG access was read-only via the AST-validated query_pg channel.
  2. os_proposal_approvals = 0 live ⇒ COMMIT is forbidden; no COMMIT, emit, registration, approval, or law change was performed or authorized.
  3. The design/control layer is complete and externally reviewed (GPT PASS, 2026-06-01); the build layer is NO-GO for the over-determined reasons in §54.2–§54.3.
  4. Build becomes GO only when, per step, the §54.4 conditions are met — beginning with a sovereign-recorded approval that no agent can supply.
  5. The §54.5 live block must be re-verified at the top of any future build/rehearsal macro; live evidence overrides any printed value.

54.8 What this doc does and does not do

  • Does: attest build-NO-GO with reasons; enumerate ready vs not-ready; state exact per-step GO conditions; specify the live re-verification block; consolidate the risk register with build-time controls.
  • Does NOT: authorize, approve, or perform any build/COMMIT/emit/registration/approval/law change; mutate any system; create a competing package. Build remains NO-GO (os_proposal_approvals = 0).
Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/one-roof-governance-technical-addendum-and-implementation-index-2026-06-01/54-build-no-go-attestation-and-risk-register.md