14 — Next Paste-Ready Prompts (state-recover from this package) (2026-06-01)
14 — Next Paste-Ready Prompts
Every prompt below state-recovers from this package and carries Hard Gate 0 + a forbidden list. Use the doc-00 §0.10 preamble as the shared header. Sequence at the bottom.
Shared header (paste at the top of each prompt):
STATE RECOVERY: Read knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/one-roof-governance-technical-addendum-and-implementation-index-2026-06-01/ docs 00→04 + this track's scaffold. This index controls; concept canon > pre-patch design; Round-4 law > earlier wording; blockers win over ambition; unclear → STOP. HARD GATE 0: no PG/Directus/Qdrant/Nuxt mutation; no schema/DOT/UI/API; no enactment/version-bump/status-change/registry-write; no approval/self-approval; no hardcode; no local governance island; no implementation disguised as scaffold. Write new docs inside this package. Return doc-00 §0.9 fields.
Prompt 1 — External critique of the implementation index
MISSION: CRITIQUE_ONE_ROOF_IMPLEMENTATION_INDEX
[shared header]
Read-only. Attack this package: (a) does any scaffold smuggle in real technical design (DDL/DOT/SQL) past the scaffold line? (b) is any blocker quietly treated as solved or down-graded? (c) does the source map actually prevent reading old technical/Round-1-3 docs as current truth? (d) does the count>1 dual-sense risk (doc 11) get a real guard, or could it leak? (e) is SB-3 surfaced everywhere "open-axis" is claimed? (f) does this package itself read as a second governance roof / island? (g) are the gates (doc 03 §3.5) complete and non-bypassable?
Return a defect list with severity + required fold; recommend GO / CONDITIONAL GO / NO-GO for opening the design tracks (T1–T10).
Forbidden: PG/Directus/Qdrant/Nuxt mutation, enactment, version bump, approval, technical design.
Prompt 2 — Council adjudication of the 8-item decision surface
MISSION: COUNCIL_ADJUDICATE_ONE_ROOF_DECISION_SURFACE
[shared header] + recover blocker doc 03 + Round-4 doc 02.
For each of C-1 (object-edge table), C-2 (APR action-type bundle), C-3/OP-B (IU owner), C-4 (review_decision adapter), C-5 (render owner), C-6 (shareable-personal + legacy deadline), H-1 (enactment phase), H-2 (OP-B ratification): present recommended default + risk + alternatives; request RULE/DEFER; produce draft-minutes per item.
Forbidden: enactment, approval creation, PG mutation, version bump, self-approval.
Prompt 3 — OP-B IU-owner decision packet (Track T2)
MISSION: DECIDE_OP_B_IU_OWNER
[shared header] + recover scaffold 12 + concept-canon doc 02 §3 + Round-4 doc 05.
Produce a council decision packet for OP-B: confirm/adjust owner-per-scope (policy→COUNCIL, substrate/health→KG-SYS+SIV, exec→DOT, render→MOUT interim TTL, law→NRM-SYS) and rule on C-4 (review_decision adapter vs full Đ32). Include live evidence (no GOV-IU agency; owner_ref free-text; conformance_status='open' all ~219; 54-cmd island; iu_three_axis_envelope 3 axes). Draft minutes only; do NOT bind into governance_registry; do NOT enact. UNBLOCKS T5 (SB-3) and T10 (IU integration).
Forbidden: PG mutation, approval, enactment, version bump, binding ownership live.
Prompt 4 — Content-only law cleanup + registration (Track T1; L-1/L-2)
MISSION: CONTENT_ONLY_LAW_CLEANUP_AND_REGISTER
[shared header] + recover doc 03 §3.3 + Round-4 doc 07 (patch matrix) + doc 08 (drift).
Read-only survey + DRAFT-only law-text corrections (no enactment, no version bump, no normative_registry write). L-1: Đ36 v4.0-vs-v5.0 authoritative version; Đ45 strip ban_hanh=false leftover; Đ37 v3.3 text reconciled to live columns + capability JSON. L-2: prepare normative_registry DRAFT rows for Đ20, Đ23, Đ44(draft), Đ45. Output a ratification packet for the human enact phase.
Forbidden: enactment, version bump, registry/law_catalog/governance_docs write, approval.
Prompt 5 — SB-1 APR action-type technical design (Track T3)
MISSION: DESIGN_GOVERNANCE_APR_ACTION_TYPES_SB1
[shared header] + recover scaffold 05 + Round-4 doc 02 (C-2) + doc 08.
Design-Only Macro Mode. Read-only PG; BEGIN..ROLLBACK rehearsal only. Design the 4 action-types (assign_governance_owner + grant_governance_exception + delegate_authority + assign_axis_owner) with handler/council-review wiring + interim exception store (admin_fallback_log). Deliver uncommitted contract + rollback + read-only rehearsal log + apply-readiness gate. PRECONDITION for live use: C-2 ruled + human enact phase.
Forbidden: committed DDL/DML, live registration, enactment, approval, production mutation.
Prompt 6 — SB-2 object/axis ownership-edge technical design (Track T4)
MISSION: DESIGN_GOVERNANCE_OBJECT_OWNERSHIP_SB2
[shared header] + recover scaffold 06 + Round-4 doc 02 (C-1) + doc 08.
Design-Only Macro Mode. Design the additive governance_object_ownership(owner_gov_code, object_type, object_ref, scope, …) table contract; prove NO migration risk to the 8 live agency→law edges (no CHECK widening); design container-grain inheritance (10^8 children, Δtotal=0); design axis ownership via the same table. Deliver uncommitted contract + rollback + read-only rehearsal log.
Forbidden: committed DDL, CHECK widening, per-row owner edges, mutation, approval.
Prompt 7 — SB-3 generic IU axis substrate technical design (Track T5; GATED on OP-B)
MISSION: DESIGN_GENERIC_IU_AXIS_SUBSTRATE_SB3
[shared header] + recover scaffold 07 + Round-4 doc 05. PRECONDITION: OP-B decided (Prompt 3).
Design-Only Macro Mode. Design the Axis Registry (ground truth) + generic iu_axis_value store + demote iu_three_axis_envelope to a hot-cache projection (with rebuild path); prove a 4th axis becomes DATA not DDL in read-only rehearsal; preserve non-exemptable reconstruction + vector invariants. Deliver uncommitted contract + rollback + rehearsal log.
Forbidden: committed DDL, ALTER of live envelope, designing before OP-B, residual 3-axis hardcode, mutation.
Prompt 8 — Governance coverage scanner / DOT technical design (Track T6; GATED)
MISSION: DESIGN_GOVERNANCE_COVERAGE_SCANNER_DOTS
[shared header] + recover scaffold 08. PRECONDITION: Prompt 1 GO + SB-1 (Prompt 5) + SB-2 (Prompt 6) accepted.
Design-Only + read-only rehearsal. Design the 6-layer coverage detector + scan/propose/apply/audit DOT family (reuse Đ19 orphan scanner + Đ35 DOT pattern + GOV-SIV + paired_dot); add dot_coverage_required rows (governance.coverage/classification/pivot/axis/iu) for SB-8; design anti-spam (coalesce_key/cooldown/summary/emit-ceiling) against live template_gap=182,378; design inventory-completeness reconciliation (twin of birth-orphan); design audit-loop activation (SB-7) reusing governance_audit_log.
Forbidden: committed DOT/scan, event emit, PG mutation, enactment.
Prompt 9 — Issue / event / notification technical design (Track T7)
MISSION: DESIGN_GOVERNANCE_ISSUE_EVENT_NOTIFICATION
[shared header] + recover scaffold 09 + Round-4 doc 08 (SB-4).
Design-Only. Design register-before-emit (Đ45) governance/integrity event-type domain in event_type_registry; REUSE thiếu_quan_hệ/sai_lệch_dữ_liệu (orphan/drift) + system_issues + event_outbox + coalesce_key idempotency; design anti-spam + owner-routing per responsibility-scope. NO registration, NO emit, NO activating dormant mother.* rows.
Forbidden: event-type registration live, emit, PG mutation, island.
Prompt 10 — Directus / API / render-ownership technical design (Track T8)
MISSION: DESIGN_GOVERNANCE_RENDER_API_OWNERSHIP
[shared header] + recover scaffold 10 + Round-4 doc 02 (C-5) + patched Registries-Pivot doc 10. PRECONDITION: C-5 framed.
Design-Only. Design Đ28 render/display ownership (delegation-now/TTL default; GOV-MOUT activation end-state); design API/Directus surface contract reusing the read-only Nitro pattern (Directus can't serve PK-less views); design no-hardcode acceptance (source-model-aware counts, no hardcoded category codes). NO route/endpoint/UI/Directus change.
Forbidden: surface change, GOV-MOUT live activation, hardcode, mutation.
Prompt 11 — Registries-Pivot integration technical design (Track T9)
MISSION: DESIGN_REGISTRIES_PIVOT_GOVERNANCE_INTEGRATION
[shared header] + recover scaffold 11 + patched Registries-Pivot docs 00/04/06/07/08/12 + concept canon.
Design-Only. Bind count>1 dual-sense WITHOUT leaking governance obligations onto the UI drill sense (prove no leak); bind grouping-as-governed-axis to the Axis Registry (carry SB-3 caveat); bind orphan/island dual-channel to T6/T7; bind pin scope (user→Class-0 at export/share; global/role/team→governed); REUSE the shipped views/endpoints/route. NO surface change.
Forbidden: UI/API/route/view change, re-ship, count>1 leak, surface-local governance island.
Prompt 12 — IU integration technical design (Track T10; GATED on OP-B + SB-3)
MISSION: DESIGN_IU_GOVERNANCE_INTEGRATION
[shared header] + recover scaffold 12 + concept canon doc 02 + Round-4 doc 05. PRECONDITION: OP-B decided (Prompt 3) + SB-3 designed (Prompt 7).
Design-Only. Bind IU coverage to the decided owner-per-scope; bind IU axes to the generic axis store (T5); rule/apply C-4 (review_decision adapter); design moving conformance_status off blanket 'open' via the coverage scanner (T6); fold the 54-cmd IU catalog island into the one-roof model; preserve non-exemptable reconstruction + vector invariants. NO IU owner-binding live, NO axis ALTER, NO IU surface change.
Forbidden: IU mutation, axis ALTER, owner-binding live, designing before OP-B+SB-3, island.
Prompt 13 — Final implementation-readiness gate
MISSION: ONE_ROOF_IMPLEMENTATION_READINESS_GATE
[shared header] + recover doc 03 §3.5 (gates) + doc 04 (T11).
Read-only. Verify EACH gate: SB-1/2/3 resolved? OP-B(C-3)+C-4 ruled? C-5 ruled? L-1/L-2 done? SB-5/6+H-1 enactment phase complete? Sovereign sign-off (H-2/SB-6) obtained via the proper path (NOT self-approval)? Produce a gate matrix: which are PASS, which are still open, what each open gate needs. Recommend GO / NO-GO for T11. Do NOT clear a gate yourself.
Forbidden: clearing a gate by assertion, self-approval, mutation, enactment.
Prompt 14 — Code implementation (Track T11) — ONLY after all gates approved
MISSION: IMPLEMENT_ONE_ROOF_GOVERNANCE_T11
[shared header] + recover doc 04 (T11) + the readiness-gate result (Prompt 13 = GO).
PRECONDITION: Prompt 13 returned GO with EVERY gate cleared by a recorded council/human ruling. Implement the approved components (action-types, object-ownership table, generic axis store, coverage scanner/DOTs, event types, render/API binding, enactment) — each through its ratified, approved channel, with five-layer sync, no-hardcode, no island, container-grain at scale. Live-apply hard gate applies.
Forbidden: any component whose upstream gate is not cleared; self-approval; hardcode; island; un-ledgered change.
Sequence
Now (parallel): Prompt 1 (critique) ∥ Prompt 2 (council adjudication) ∥ Prompt 3 (OP-B) ∥ Prompt 4 (law cleanup) ∥ Prompt 5 (SB-1) ∥ Prompt 6 (SB-2) ∥ Prompt 9 (events) ∥ Prompt 10 (render, after C-5 framed) ∥ Prompt 11 (Registries-Pivot). Then: Prompt 7 (SB-3, after OP-B) → Prompt 8 (scanner, after SB-1+SB-2 + critique GO) → Prompt 12 (IU, after OP-B+SB-3). Gate: Prompt 13 (readiness gate) → Prompt 14 (build) only on GO. If a reviewer downgrades this index: fold the objections into the affected docs (do not restart), re-run Prompt 1, re-issue the verdict.