125 — Phase 1 Approval-Intake & Build Mission Self-Review

Self-review of the mission ONE_ROOF_GOVERNANCE_PHASE1_APPROVAL_INTAKE_AND_BUILD. Outcome: BLOCKED at Hard Gate A, no build, zero mutation. Self-review verdict: PASS — the blocked outcome is the correct and required one.

125.1 Checklist

#	Check	Result
1	State recovery complete (read docs 89/95/GPT-review in full; live schema + baseline)	PASS
2	Approval/intake schema analyzed before any mutation	PASS (doc 114)
3	Determined whether GPT-delegated auth can satisfy M-1	PASS — NO, with 4 independent reasons (doc 114 §114.5)
4	Discovered the decisive fact (os_proposal_approvals = human e-signature surface)	PASS
5	No approval record fabricated	PASS — none created
6	No self-approval / impersonation	PASS
7	Build did not start while M-1 red	PASS
8	No out-of-scope mutation (emit/DOT/Directus/Qdrant/Nuxt/law/version)	PASS — all 0
9	All 12 deliverable docs created (114–125), blocked steps as NOT_RUN/BLOCKED	PASS
10	Live baseline == doc-96/113 baseline (no drift, no foreign mutation)	PASS
11	Residue ZERO; no open transaction/session	PASS
12	Stop conditions honored (doc 89 §89.7: M-1=0 → STOP)	PASS
13	Next-stage path is correct and names the only legitimate actor (sovereign)	PASS
14	Read channel stayed read-only; no write channel used against substrate	PASS

14/14 PASS.

125.2 Was BLOCKED the right call vs. the GPT authorization doc?

Yes. The mission explicitly conditioned record creation on consistency "with the live schema and governance rules" and ordered "If approval/intake cannot be recorded correctly, STOP. Do not build." The controlling artifact (doc 89 §89.6) states a GPT/agent statement is never sufficient for a COMMIT; only the sovereign os_proposal_approvals row is. The live schema then revealed why the design is built this way: M-1 is a human e-signature. Honoring an advisory GPT doc over the sovereign gate would have been the single worst failure mode this project guards against. The agent refused to fabricate the gate — consistent with every prior run, now with the underlying mechanism documented.

125.3 New, durable finding from this run

os_proposal_approvals is not a generic boolean/flag table — it is the Directus os_* proposal e-signature module (os_proposals / os_proposal_blocks / os_proposal_contacts / os_proposal_approvals). M-1 is structurally un-satisfiable by any automated agent. This should be recorded at the top of the build handoff so no future run wastes effort attempting Phase A: the only path to M-1 green is the President e-signing in Directus, out of band from the build agent.

125.4 Verdict

Self-review PASS. Mission outcome BLOCKED is correct. Zero mutation. Substrate safe.