13 — Self-Review & Acceptance (Round 4)

13.1 Verdict

STATUS = PASS. Decision = CONDITIONAL GO (confirmed + tightened). Concept/principle canonical design docs may be patched now (carrying M-DEF-1..10 + §0-GOV + blocker flags); apply/remediation-binding, IU surface, law-file edits, and enactment remain NO-GO behind named prerequisites.

13.2 No-mutation confirmation

• Live PG: ≈24 read-only SELECT queries (role context_pack_readonly, READ ONLY tx, statement_timeout 5s). Zero INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/DDL. A few queries errored on column names (e.g. is_mother, aa.request_id) and were re-issued read-only — no mutation occurred. No pg_schema/directus_* write tool used.
• Subagents: 4 background extraction agents performed read-only KB reads (+ a few read-only PG reads); no writes.
• KB: 14 upload_document writes only into this package path (…/one-roof-governance-law-hardening-finalization-round4-2026-06-01/00–13). No delete/patch of any existing doc; prior packages + canonical design docs read-only.
• Net effect on system truth = zero. Additive KB reporting only.

13.3 Forbidden-action compliance (mission §18)

Forbidden	Complied
PG / Directus / Qdrant / vector mutation	✅ none
Nuxt/UI implementation, route change	✅ none
Law enactment / version bump / status change	✅ none
normative_registry / law_catalog / governance_docs update	✅ none
Approval creation / self-approval	✅ none
Table/schema change, DDL (even rehearsed)	✅ none
Event/job/notification emit	✅ none
Canonical design-doc patch	✅ none (only new report docs)
Hardcode / fixed current axes	✅ none — and SB-3 explicitly surfaces the existing substrate hardcode rather than hiding it
Hidden local-governance island	✅ none
Restart from scratch	✅ continuation; completed work verified, not redone

13.4 Acceptance criteria (mission §19) — all PASS

#	Criterion	Result
1	State recovery proves whether Round 3 was a continuation + what it completed	✅ doc 01 (VERIFIED true continuation; 3 discrepancies corrected)
2	All unresolved questions closed or explicitly classified	✅ doc 02 (27 items, 0 vague)
3	All domains / future domains coverage-tested	✅ doc 03 (~29 current + 8 future)
4	"count > 1" rule made precise + testable	✅ doc 04 (M-DEF-10 + 11 tests)
5	IU open-axis model final-hardened	✅ doc 05 (+ SB-3 evidence)
6	Điều 37 centralization decision exists	✅ doc 06 (own/ref/specialize/exclude/defer)
7	Specialized-law patch matrix exists	✅ doc 07 (Đ0-G..Đ45)
8	Live-PG compatibility blockers listed exactly	✅ doc 08 (SB-1..SB-9)
9	Red-Team v3 ≥60 scenarios, thresholds met	✅ doc 09 (64; 100% caught, 90.6% auto, 0 ❌)
10	Final hardened law package exists	✅ doc 10 (bilingual clause cards)
11	GO/NO-GO explicit	✅ doc 11 (CONDITIONAL GO)
12	No unsafe mutation occurred	✅ §13.2

No major unresolved legal ambiguity remains unclassified → PASS admissible (not PARTIAL/BLOCKED).

13.5 Honest weaknesses / residual risks

1. Same CONDITIONAL frontier as Round 3. The concept layer is tight, but SB-1/SB-2/OP-B are real and undone; this is a design-readiness PASS, not a "fully buildable" PASS. Mitigation: every blocker is detected + gate-blocked + has a named upgrade path (Red-Team v3 0 ❌).
2. SB-3 widens the substrate prerequisite set. Round 4 surfaced a new substrate blocker (the IU iu_three_axis_envelope hardcodes 3 axes) that Round 3 did not name. This is a strengthening (more honest), but it means "no fixed axis array" is contradicted at the IU substrate today — concept-true, substrate-false until generalized.
3. Recommended defaults ≠ council rulings. The 8-item decision surface (C-1..C-6, H-1/H-2) carries defaults, not decisions; if council diverges (esp. C-4 review_decision → full Đ32, or C-1 widen-CHECK over new-table), some downstream design shifts.
4. Self-grading risk on Red-Team v3. The adversarial scenarios were authored by the same agent that authored the clauses; Prompt 8 (external critique) is the intended counter.
5. Source-level route inventory unverified. The VPS Nuxt/source tree is outside the read_file allowlist; OQ-G1 route-completeness (scan root) could not be source-verified this session — left defer-safe with the fail-closed default.
6. IU conformance never closed. conformance_status='open' on all 219 IUs means IU's own machinery has never verified coverage; the model assumes GOV-SIV will close it — unproven until implemented.
7. Snapshot count drift. dot_iu_command_catalog has been 47/53/54 across snapshots; live 2026-06-01 = 54 used here. Minor, non-load-bearing.

None of these is an uncaught red-team escape; they are scoping/sequencing realities the CONDITIONAL GO already accounts for.

13.6 Completeness

14 docs (00–13) uploaded, revision 1; Branches A–K delivered; open-question ledger = 27 items (0 vague); domain proof = 37 domains; count>1 = 11 acceptance tests; Red-Team v3 = 64 (≥60); clause cards = M-DEF-1..10 + 8 named clauses + §0-GOV + reference pattern; next prompts = 8 (≥6); all 20 success-target questions answered (doc 00 §0.5).

13.7 Final self-statement

Round 4 did exactly the safe, bounded work the mission authorized: it recovered state, verified Round 3 as a true continuation, closed every open question into a firm disposition, hardened the count>1 and open-axis rules against live evidence (including the newly-surfaced IU axis-envelope hardcode), produced the Đ37 centralization decision + specialized-law matrix + exact substrate-blocker list, passed a 64-scenario red-team, and issued a precise CONDITIONAL GO — all read-only, zero mutation, no law/design/enactment change. The legal/design foundation is now tight enough for concept-level canonical design patching to begin, with the apply/IU-surface/enactment tiers correctly held behind 8 named decisions and 3 substrate deltas.