16 — Self-Review & Acceptance (Hardening Revision)

Final self-review: forbidden-action compliance, acceptance-criteria check, mutation audit, honest weaknesses, and the package verdict.

16.1 Forbidden-action compliance (mission §20)

Forbidden	Complied?	Evidence
No PG mutation	✅	Only SELECT + information_schema/pg_constraint reads; role context_pack_readonly (read-only transaction, statement-timeout, LIMIT 500)
No Directus mutation	✅	No Directus write tool called
No Qdrant/vector write	✅	No vector tool called
No Nuxt/UI implementation	✅	No file/route change
No route change	✅	—
No law enactment	✅	All clause text DRAFT
No version bump	✅	No *_version enacted-change
No status change	✅	—
No normative_registry update	✅	Not touched
No law_catalog update	✅	Not touched
No approval creation	✅	approval_requests/os_proposal_approvals read-only counts only
No self-approval	✅	—
No table/schema change	✅	No DDL
No event/job/notification emit	✅	No emit tool called
No canonical design doc patch	✅	Only new docs in this report package; canonical design package untouched
No hardcode	✅	Model has no hardcoded list it depends on; current-axis/owner tables are illustrative (doc 02 §2.10)
No fixed hardcoded current axes	✅	Open-axis model + Axis Registry (M-DEF-8/9); §2.10 no-array statement
No hidden local governance island	✅	§4.15c (object + law level) + §0-GOV hook + island detection

All 18 forbidden actions complied. Tool log: KB reads (list/batch_read/search), KB writes only to this package's 17 docs (upload_document), PG reads only. Zero mutation outside the KB report package.

16.2 Acceptance-criteria check (mission §21)

All 15 PASS conditions met — see doc 14 §14.4 (reproduced verdict: ✅×15). Specifically: Tier-1 folded (doc 01); IU first-class (doc 03); future axes without hardcode (doc 02); all laws reconciled (doc 04); Đ37 hub (doc 05); 13 object classes + profiles (doc 06); ownership hardened (doc 07); exceptions hardened (doc 08); invariant v2 scale+inheritance (doc 09); detection obligations (doc 10); noise control (doc 11); red-team v2 = 48 scenarios (doc 12); hardened clause package (doc 13); explicit GO/NO-GO (doc 14); no unsafe mutation (§16.1).

16.3 Success-target check (mission §3)

All 12 success-target questions answered (doc 14 §14.5). The mission's bar — "do not return PASS unless the output is strong enough for GPT/User review without needing the user to remember missing domains" — is met by: the open-axis model (no domain list to remember — the predicate + registry decide), the §0-GOV hook (future laws self-declare), the inventory reconciliation (anything unclassified is flagged), and the Class 12 FUTURE + owner-of-last-resort (unknown types are owned on contact). The user does not have to remember any domain; the model catches omissions structurally.

16.4 Mutation audit (read-only proof)

• PG: 11 queries this session, all read-only: pg_constraint (object-edge CHECK), information_schema.columns (×3: approval_requests, event_type_registry, dot_tools), governance_registry SELECT, event_type_registry SELECT, approval_requests distinct codes + os_proposal_approvals count, plus the subagent's read-only IU queries. No INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/DDL. Role enforced read-only.
• KB: read (list/batch_read/search) + 17 upload_document writes, all into …/one-roof-governance-hardening-revision-all-domains-all-axes-2026-06-01/. No KB delete/patch of existing docs. The canonical design package and prior report packages were read only, never modified.
• Net effect on system truth: zero. This package is additive KB reporting.

16.5 What changed vs the prior hardening package

Aspect	Prior package	This revision
Scope	Registries-Pivot-centric	System-wide, all domains
Axes	enumerated current axes	open-axis model + Axis Registry (M-DEF-8/9)
IU	not covered	first-class domain, generic axis model (doc 03)
Tier-1	listed as blockers	folded into one revision (doc 01)
Đ37	one revised clause	hub model: own/reference/§0-GOV hook (doc 05)
Object classes	8 profiles	13 classes + FUTURE catch-all (doc 06)
Red-team	24, caught 3/24 un-hardened	48, 100% caught-or-classified post-fold (doc 12)
Verdict	NO-GO until folded	CONDITIONAL GO (concept docs); folding done here

16.6 Honest weaknesses & residual risk

1. T1-6 is unresolved (by design). The single substrate delta (object/axis ownership edges + 4 APR action-types) is named, detected, and gate-blocked — but not built. Auto-remediation of object/axis owners is inoperable until it lands. This is the basis of the CONDITIONAL (not full) GO. Mitigation: it is detected and blocked, so no silent escape; the next macro (Prompt 4) specs it.
2. OP-B (IU owner) is a council decision, not resolvable in a read-only mission. IU stays an island until the council assigns the owner + rules on the review_decision exception. Mitigation: doc 03 §3.5 gives the recommended assignment + OQ-IU-OWNER default.
3. Axis Registry does not exist live. The open-axis model's keystone is a registry that must be born/registered. Until then, axis detection is case-by-case and the registry's absence is itself the first inventory_gap. Mitigation: this is honest (the model detects its own missing keystone), but the model is only as strong as the registry's eventual coverage.
4. Route inventory is "derived-on-scan," not a table. This is reuse-first but depends on a reliable nginx+Nuxt scan root on the VPS (OQ-G1). If the scan root is wrong, routes can still escape. Mitigation: OQ-G1 default (defined scan root); CI prompt 7.
5. Doc-drift in the laws themselves (Đ45 ban_hanh=false, Đ36 v4.0/v5.0, Đ37 v3.3 vs live columns) is documented but not resolved — it must be cleaned (content-only) before a law patch (Prompt 6). It does not block the design patch.
6. Live capability vs design-doc drift in IU (live IU machinery is ahead of its DRAFT design docs). The IU map is live-verified, but the IU design docs understate live capability — a future IU design patch must reconcile to live, not to the stale docs.
7. review_decision as a governed approval-adapter is a recommended default, not a council ruling. If the council instead requires all IU mutations through Đ32, the IU de-islanding is heavier than doc 03 assumes.

None of these are uncaught-critical red-team escapes (doc 12 has zero ❌); they are scoping/sequencing realities that the CONDITIONAL GO already accounts for.

16.7 Completeness check

17 docs created (00–16), all uploaded to the package path (revision 1). Branches A–N all delivered. Mission §18 doc list matched exactly. Required next prompts: 8 (≥6 required, doc 15). Red-team: 48 (≥44 required). Object classes: 13 (≥13 required). Definitions: 9 (M-DEF-1..9, ≥7 prior + 2 new).

16.8 Verdict

STATUS: PASS.

The hardened legal/design model folds all Tier-1 blockers, generalizes to all domains via an open-axis model with no hardcode, makes Information Unit a first-class governed domain with a generic axis model, reconciles 20+ laws into a keep/centralize/reference/patch/defer matrix, defines Điều 37 as a hub (not a dump) with a §0-GOV hook for future laws, hardens ownership/exception/invariant/detection/noise, and survives a 48-scenario red-team at 100% caught-or-classified with zero uncaught critical.

Decision: CONDITIONAL GO for canonical design patching — GO for the concept/principle docs now (carrying doc 13's definitions + the T1-6/OP-B flags), NO-GO for the apply/remediation-binding docs until the one substrate delta (T1-6) lands and the council assigns the IU owner (OP-B). Zero unsafe mutation occurred.