13 — Self-Review & Acceptance

§17. Self-audit of the pack against the mission's acceptance criteria and forbidden list.

13.1 Acceptance criteria (mission §17)

#	Criterion	Status	Where
1	One-Roof Governance principle defined	✅ PASS	doc 01 (VN + technical + examples/non-examples + 7 forbidden patterns + application matrix)
2	Governed Object Contract defined	✅ PASS	doc 02 (broad definition, 18-link set, min-links by 7 object classes, covered-vs-not)
3	Governance-orphan / anarchic object defined	✅ PASS	doc 03 (4 definitions, 12 gap types, 4 severities, current-case classification)
4	Governance Coverage Invariant defined	✅ PASS	doc 04 (accounting identity, gates, inheritance, computed-not-remembered, PASS gate)
5	Scalable detection architecture exists	✅ PASS	doc 05 (6 layers L1–L6, per-view spec, reuse ledger)
6	GOV-SIV / GOV-DOT scanner lifecycle exists	✅ PASS	doc 06 (7 DOTs, lifecycle, pairing map, anti-bootstrap rule)
7	Issue/event model exists	✅ PASS	doc 07 (16 types, reuse-first, Đ45 discipline, throttling)
8	Law/design clause drafts exist	✅ PASS	doc 08 (Đ37/31/35/24-29/26/28/45 drafts, marked draft-only)
9	Future RP design patch plan exists	✅ PASS	doc 09 (7 patches to real files, filename reconciliation)
10	Future implementation plan exists	✅ PASS	doc 10 (9 gated phases, per-phase contract)
11	Scale strategy exists	✅ PASS	doc 11 (14 sub-strategies incl. 10⁸ + auto-cover)
12	No canonical design docs patched	✅ PASS	only list_documents (read) on design package; zero writes there
13	No unsafe mutation occurred	✅ PASS	only SELECT + KB report uploads; §13.3

Overall: PASS.

13.2 Mission-branch coverage (§3–§13)

Branch	Required	Doc
A One-Roof principle	VN/tech def, examples, non-examples, forbidden, application	01
B Governed Object Contract	broad def, link set, min-links per class	02
C Orphan/Anarchic/Island	defs, 12 gap types, severity, examples	03
D Coverage Invariant	identity, covered/not, gates	04
E Detection architecture	6 layers, per-view spec	05
F GOV-SIV/GOV-DOT lifecycle	7 DOTs full spec	06
G Issue/Event model	16 types full spec	07
H Law clause drafts	7 laws	08
I RP patch plan	7 patches	09
J Implementation plan	9 phases	10
K Scale strategy	all 14 bullets	11
§15 ≥8 next prompts	9 prompts	12
§14 14-doc package	00–13	all

All branches covered.

13.3 Forbidden compliance (mission §16)

Forbidden	Complied	Evidence
No PG mutation	✅	only query_pg (read-only role, READ ONLY txn, AST-blocked writes/DDL)
No Directus mutation	✅	no Directus write tool invoked
No Qdrant/vector write	✅	none invoked
No Nuxt/UI implementation	✅	none
No route change	✅	none
No law enactment	✅	no normative_registry write; clauses are drafts; engine blocks APR enactment anyway
No approval creation	✅	no approval_requests/apr_approvals/os_proposal_approvals write
No self-approval	✅	none
No new governance owner created	✅	GOV-* owners only referenced; none created (proposals are future, approval-gated)
No table creation	✅	views/tables in docs are designs, not created
No schema change	✅	§5.4-EXT object-edge is explicitly deferred, not applied
No event/job/notification emit	✅	event types only listed for future registration
No hardcode	✅	every literal sourced (counts from live PG, clause IDs from KB law text, thresholds named as governed)
No production deployment	✅	none
No canonical design doc patch	✅	design package read-only; doc 09 is a plan

The KB report uploads are the sanctioned output channel (mission: "Apply channel: KB report docs only"). They are not data/Qdrant/Directus mutations; they are the deliverable.

13.4 Honesty / drift notes (what is asserted vs. assumed)

• All live counts are from this session's query_pg (2026-06-01): governance_registry=9 (5 active/4 draft), governance_relations=8 (all agency→law), governance_audit_log=1 (relation-keyed), dot_tools=309, event_type_registry=40, system_issues=188,250, apr_approvals=42, os_proposal_approvals=0, apr_action_types amend_law/enact_nrm=unimplemented. Not from memory.
• Law clause IDs (Đ37 §4.12/4.13/4.14/§5.4/§12; Đ31 NT1/2/6/§4.5/4.6/4.8; Đ35 §3/§6.2/§6.5; Đ45 §3.2/§4/§6.7/§15; Đ24 §5.2; Đ26 §II-QUATER/§0-AU; Đ28 NT-D1/§VIII; Đ32 §4.2/§4.3/§3.3) are from this session's KB law reads, not invented.
• Filename reconciliation (doc 09 §9.1): the mission's assumed design filenames were corrected against live list_documents — 00 is 00-master-design-v0.1.md, 08 is taken, so the "new 08" became new 14-…. This is the "verify before recommending" discipline.
• Đ45 status: internal inconsistency observed (header/tags = enacted; trailing ban_hanh=false leftover lines). Authoritative state taken as v1.0 enacted (title/header/§0/§18.3); flagged as GOVERNANCE_SCHEMA_DRIFT rather than silently resolved.
• Đ36 status: Constitution index lists v4.0 enacted, but dieu36-collection-protocol-law.md holds a v5.0 30% draft — a drift flagged, not relied upon.
• The current honest baseline is GOVERNANCE_COVERAGE_PASS(system, truth-class)=FALSE (doc 04 §4.7): 4 draft owner agencies, ≥4 agency-orphaned laws (28/24/26/45), 1 unratified Direct-PG exception, policy objects unowned. The pack's job is to make this visible and drive it to zero, not to claim it is already solved.

13.5 Open risks / residual gaps (for council, doc 12 Prompt 1)

1. Structural §5.4-EXT decision. Object-ownership edges are the clean long-term answer but a Tier-3 schema change. The pack defers it and uses law_jurisdiction+inheritance meanwhile — council must confirm this interim is acceptable at scale.
2. GOV-MOUT activation is the critical-path blocker for render ownership (P7); high-risk Đ32 approval.
3. Law ratification is human-only (APR amend_law/enact_nrm unimplemented) — longest lead; may await the Information-Unit law substrate.
4. Phantom definition assigned a home (GOV-COUNCIL define + Đ31 detect), but the precise per-source-model phantom definition (record>actual is unreliable for model-A write-race vs model-B genuine) still needs a clause — drafted in doc 08 §8.5 but needs council wording.
5. Direct-PG exception must be ratified or removed; today un-ledgered in vps_deploy_log.

13.6 Self-review verdict

The pack is internally consistent, live-anchored, reuse-first, and non-islanding. It defines One-Roof Governance, the governed-object contract, the orphan/anarchic/island taxonomy, the coverage invariant, a scalable detector, a DOT lifecycle, an issue/event model, draft clauses, a patch plan, an implementation plan, a scale strategy, and 9 next prompts — without patching canonical docs, enacting law, creating approvals, minting owners, or mutating any substrate. Status: PASS.

End of pack. Entry point: doc 00. Next action: doc 12 Prompt 1 (council critique).