KB-350F

15 — Self-Review & Acceptance (PASS 15/15, forbidden-compliance, design-only, 2026-06-02)

6 min read Revision 1
one-roof-governanceself-reviewacceptancepassforbidden-complianceno-mutationdesign-only2026-06-01

15 — Self-Review & Acceptance

Reviews this package against the mission's 15 acceptance criteria and the forbidden list. Result: PASS (15/15), design complete, zero unsafe mutation.


15.1 Acceptance criteria (mission §15)

# Criterion Status Evidence
1 State recovery complete doc 00 §00.2 — charter + 3 GPT analyses + impl-index 00–125 + 6 law/concept docs read
2 Live substrate audit complete doc 01 — existence matrix, columns, distributions, gaps (read-only)
3 Authorization model recommendation complete doc 02 — L0–L4 ladder + governance_build_authorization + B2's 6 answers
4 Axis operating model complete doc 03 — Registry/Node/Relation/Assignment/Projection/Issue/Lifecycle, M-DEF-8/9
5 PG-first storage model complete doc 04 — born vs candidate, reuse map, axis_assignment
6 Proposal layer evaluation complete doc 05 — 4 options × 8 dimensions → hybrid PG-native
7 Topic workflow complete doc 06 — 3 entry paths, lifecycle, merge/split, Điều 38/39
8 Reconstruction/containment workflow complete doc 07 — deterministic axes, fingerprint invariant, graph-vs-tree
9 Agent workflow model complete doc 08 — 6 roles, no-self-approve, config-driven, Điều 45 handoff
10 Governance coverage model complete doc 09 — when-governed, scanner, unregistered-axis/island, noise control
11 UI projection model complete doc 10 — surfaces, badges, candidate-vs-official, views-only
12 Phase-1 impact assessment complete doc 12 — Class 1–4 classification
13 Required design patches listed doc 13 — P1–P7 + L1–L4 + provenance recommendation
14 No unsafe mutation occurred §15.3; every PG call was a read-only SELECT; only KB writes are this package + 1 cross-link line
15 No unresolved conceptual blocker hidden §15.4 — open questions stated explicitly

15.2 Headline verdicts (consolidated)

  • Live audit: PASS — ~85% reuse; real gaps G1 (build-auth), G2 (axis registry / inventory_gap), G3 (semantic assignment confidence/zone), G4 (envelope hardcodes 3), G5 (IU island), G6 (entity_relations unbuilt), G7 (os_proposal_approvals=sales module).
  • Authorization: RECOMMENDED — L0–L4; new governance_build_authorization (L3); os_proposal_approvals=L4-only; M-1 redefined per-step.
  • Axis model: RECOMMENDED — generalize taxonomy_facetsaxis_registry; envelope=projection; deterministic vs uncertain via axis_kind.
  • PG storage: RECOMMENDED — born=active topic/axis nodes+IUs; candidate=uncertain; 2 new additive tables.
  • Proposal layer: RECOMMENDED — hybrid PG-native; no external Git now.
  • Topic / reconstruction-containment / agent / coverage / UI: all designed.
  • Phase-1: unblocked by a decision (Class 1), then rehearsed-green spine builds empty/inactive under L3 (Class 2); axis content (Class 3); activation (Class 4) deferred.

15.3 Forbidden-compliance (mission §16)

Forbidden Complied?
Persistent PG mutation ✅ none — all SELECT (READ ONLY role)
COMMIT ✅ no PG transaction opened
Schema/table/view/function/trigger creation ✅ all new objects are paper designs
Directus/Qdrant/Nuxt mutation ✅ none
Approval/self-approval creation ✅ none
Event/DOT registration; event emit ✅ none
Law enactment/version/status change normative_registry/law_catalog untouched
Production changes ✅ none
Implementation disguised as design ✅ designs only; CREATE-TABLE detail deferred to P2
Hardcode ✅ vocabularies/thresholds/levels are governed rows
Local governance island ✅ new package cross-links impl-index (docs 00/01/12/13) + a one-line pointer added to its read-me; reuses live substrate

KB writes performed: docs 00–15 in the new package (16 docs) + one additive cross-link line in the implementation-index read-me. No other writes anywhere.

15.4 Open questions / blockers stated explicitly (none hidden)

  1. Bootstrap authority: introducing the L0–L4 model + governance_build_authorization changes the authority model ⇒ it needs council L2 + sovereign L4 ratification (doc 12 Class 1). This is a decision, not a design gap.
  2. os_proposal_approvals provenance: it is a sales module; interim-reserve vs purpose-built sovereign e-sign collection is a council decision (doc 02 §02.3b, doc 13 §13.3).
  3. FAC-08 cardinality/max: activating topic needs a council decision on cardinality/max_labels_per_entity (doc 06).
  4. entity_relations unbuilt: NĐ-36-01 soft-relation substrate is decreed but absent; topic semantic relations interim-route through universal_edges (doc 01/13).
  5. IU island / OP-B / C-4: IU owner-per-scope and review_decision_id adapter vs central Đ32 remain council decisions (doc 09, P6).
  6. A-9 apply DOT: the mutating governance apply DOT stays forbidden until H-1/H-2/SB-6 (doc 12 Class 4).

15.5 Final status

PASS — design complete, all 16 docs delivered, zero unsafe mutation, no hidden blocker. Build remains correctly NO-GO until the authorization-model change (doc 02) is ratified and per-step L3 build-authorizations are issued. Next macro: P1 (authorization-model ratification, doc 14) — the critical path — in parallel with P3 (GPT review) and P2 (detailed substrate design).

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/one-roof-axis-proposal-authorization-operating-substrate-design-2026-06-01/15-self-review.md