KB-21F9

13 — Design Patches Required (fold-backs to implementation-index docs + laws/concepts, design-only, 2026-06-02)

5 min read Revision 1
one-roof-governancedesign-patchesm-1-redefinitiongovernance_build_authorizationaxis_registryaxis_assignmentsb-3fn_auto_approve_addfold-indesign-only2026-06-01

13 — Design Patches Required

Exact patches this design implies for the implementation-index package and the laws/concept docs. These are paper instructions, applied later by the proper authority at build time — nothing is mutated here beyond a one-line cross-link pointer (§13.4).


13.1 Patches to the implementation-index package (…/one-roof-governance-technical-addendum-and-implementation-index-2026-06-01/)

# Target doc(s) Patch Risk class
P1 88, 89, 95, 96, 100, 114, 124 (M-1 definition) Redefine M-1: from "≥1 row in os_proposal_approvals" → "a valid governance_build_authorization for THIS step (v_build_auth_valid); sovereign e-sign required only if requires_sovereign_esign." (doc 02 §02.7) governance change — needs L2+L4 ratification
P2 93–99 (build plan) Insert a new first build step "SB-0 / Authorization substrate": create governance_build_authorization + v_build_auth_valid + new apr_action_types rows (authorize_build_step, activate_event_type, register_axis, register_topic_node, all risk=high). All later spine steps reference it. governance change
P3 72 (build-authorization template), 95 (auth forms) Reserve os_proposal_approvals for L4 only; the COMMIT template's M-1 line points to governance_build_authorization, not os_proposal_approvals, except for L4-escalated steps. governance change
P4 07-sb3 scaffold, 38–44 (GCOS substrate) Add axis_registry + axis_assignment as named substrate blockers (SB-AXIS-1/2) alongside SB-10..13; SB-3 becomes "generalize the envelope into a projection of axis_registry" (remove the hardcoded-3). additive design
P5 27 (auto-approve hardening), 84 Fix fn_auto_approve_add default: replace "auto-approve action='add'" with "auto-approve only if proposed_action_code ∈ governed auto-approve allowlist AND risk_level='low'; else fail-safe deny" (doc 02 L0). hardening
P6 31–35 (GCOS), 09 (issue/event scaffold) Register axis issue types (axis_unregistered, inventory_gap, axis_owner_gap, axis_vocab_unowned, axis_grouping_island, topic_overlap, wrong_topic, reconstruction_integrity_fail, containment_cycle, governance_island) in the governance event domain (register-before-emit, Điều 45). additive design
P7 26 (OP-B IU owner), 17 (SB-2) Owner-per-scope must cover axes/topic: the Axis Registry + topic facet owners (GOV-COUNCIL policy / GOV-KG-SYS substrate / GOV-SIV integrity) are part of OP-B/SB-2 ratification, not a separate decision. governance decision

13.2 Patches to laws / concept docs

# Target Patch
L1 concept 02-open-axis-… + hardening 02-open-axis-model Promote the Axis Registry (M-DEF-9) from concept to a build blocker with the nine-attribute table (doc 03 §03.2); its absence is the live inventory_gap (critical).
L2 dieu38-…/L3-metadata-governance (DRAFT) Name axis_assignment as the semantic-assignment substrate carrying confidence/evidence/zone/provenance; affirm "máy trước, người sau" + derived-first for structural axes.
L3 nd-36-01-… Flag that the soft-relation substrate (entity_relations, abbreviation_dict, disambiguation_log, entity_embeddings) is decreed but unbuilt (doc 01) — any topic/axis design must treat it as future and interim-route soft relations through universal_edges.
L4 dieu39-knowledge-graph-law (ENACTED) No change to law; record that KG-assisted dynamic topics stay provisional/AI-facing until promoted (Golden Rule) and that topic promotion is governance, not KG.

13.3 The os_proposal_approvals provenance recommendation

os_proposal_approvals is a sales/deal proposal e-sign module (siblings os_proposals/os_deal_stages/…). Two paths (doc 02 §02.3b):

  • Interim: keep it as L4 sovereign e-sign, agent-forbidden, M-1 redefined off it for L3 builds.
  • Target (recommended, council decision): stand up a purpose-built governance sovereign e-sign collection so the sales module returns to sales use. This is itself an L2/L4 decision — listed here, not done.

To satisfy "no unlinked island," a one-line pointer from the implementation-index read-me to this package is added (§13.4 applied via patch_document on 00-read-me-first-implementation-index.md). This package already cross-references the implementation-index by doc number throughout (docs 00, 01, 12). No other implementation-index content is changed by this design run.

13.5 Patch ordering

P1+P2+P3 (authorization) are the critical path and must precede any spine build (doc 12 Class 1). P4–P7 + L1–L4 are accepted alongside this package's detailed-design phase (doc 12 Class 3). P5 (auto-approve fix) can land early as a standalone hardening. None are executed in this design-only run.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/one-roof-axis-proposal-authorization-operating-substrate-design-2026-06-01/13-design-patches-required.md