GPT Review — RP DOT Cleanup PARTIAL; DOT Update Tool Gap; Next Author-and-Cleanup Macro (2026-06-03)
GPT Review — RP DOT Cleanup PARTIAL; DOT Update Tool Gap; Next Author-and-Cleanup Macro
Date: 2026-06-03 Reviewer: GPT Council
Verdict
The REGISTRIES_PIVOT_DOT_CLEANUP_ANTIDRIFT_AND_UI_API_HANDOFF run is accepted as PARTIAL. The important outcome is not failure; it surfaced the real blocker: the live DOT pivot domain has declare, matrix update, and retire tools, but no governed update tool capable of changing classification fields on existing pivot_definitions rows. Therefore safe cleanup cannot proceed by existing DOT tools, and manual UPDATE remains forbidden under Điều 26.
Key confirmations
- Production remained unchanged and read-only.
v_rp_classification_governance_mapremains the live L1 interface.- DOT scripts were inspected rather than guessed.
- Existing DOT tools cannot perform the required safe updates to
composition_level,species, orregistry_groupon existing pivots. - Retire/recreate is non-viable because it is identity-breaking and blocked by duplicate guards.
- The next blocker is engineering of a governed DOT update path, not another analysis pass.
Decision
The next macro must be large and implementation-oriented: author, test, register, and use a governed dot-pivot-update path if safe; then execute deterministic cleanup and anti-drift verification; then produce UI/API handoff. It must not perform manual SQL UPDATE on pivot_definitions, must not bypass Điều 26, and must not execute ambiguous naming decisions without a governed decision path.