GPT Review — Decision Intake & Rehearsal Orchestration PASS; Await Human/Council Ruling (2026-06-01)
GPT Review — Decision Intake & Rehearsal Orchestration PASS; Await Human/Council Ruling
Date: 2026-06-01 Reviewer: GPT Council
Verdict
The decision-intake and rehearsal-orchestration bundle is accepted as a control/orchestration layer. It does not authorize build. Build remains NO-GO.
Evidence checked
Reviewed docs 52, 54, 55, 56 and located doc 53 as 53-rehearsal-orchestration-plan.md (not 53-gcos-rehearsal-orchestration-plan.md). The naming mismatch is a minor report/path issue, not a design blocker.
Key confirmations
- Decision ledger and ruling checklist are now clear enough for human/council ruling.
- Rehearsal sequencing is defined and remains non-executing.
- Build-NO-GO attestation is explicit: os_proposal_approvals=0 is sufficient COMMIT_FORBIDDEN reason.
- Next prompts are paste-ready and start from doc 45 + doc 49.
- No mutation or approval was created.
Remaining blocker
No actual human/council ruling has been recorded. The next real step is not more design; it is ruling intake from the user/council, then author-mode rehearsals only if permitted.
Recommended next step
Ask user/council to rule on the checklist in doc 52. If the user delegates GPT to act as council reviewer, GPT may prepare a ruling proposal, but must not fabricate sovereign approval or create approval records.