KB-71A7

GPT Review — Decision Intake & Rehearsal Orchestration PASS; Await Human/Council Ruling (2026-06-01)

2 min read Revision 1
gptone-roof-governancedecision-intakerehearsal-orchestrationreviewbuild-no-go2026-06-01

GPT Review — Decision Intake & Rehearsal Orchestration PASS; Await Human/Council Ruling

Date: 2026-06-01 Reviewer: GPT Council

Verdict

The decision-intake and rehearsal-orchestration bundle is accepted as a control/orchestration layer. It does not authorize build. Build remains NO-GO.

Evidence checked

Reviewed docs 52, 54, 55, 56 and located doc 53 as 53-rehearsal-orchestration-plan.md (not 53-gcos-rehearsal-orchestration-plan.md). The naming mismatch is a minor report/path issue, not a design blocker.

Key confirmations

  • Decision ledger and ruling checklist are now clear enough for human/council ruling.
  • Rehearsal sequencing is defined and remains non-executing.
  • Build-NO-GO attestation is explicit: os_proposal_approvals=0 is sufficient COMMIT_FORBIDDEN reason.
  • Next prompts are paste-ready and start from doc 45 + doc 49.
  • No mutation or approval was created.

Remaining blocker

No actual human/council ruling has been recorded. The next real step is not more design; it is ruling intake from the user/council, then author-mode rehearsals only if permitted.

Ask user/council to rule on the checklist in doc 52. If the user delegates GPT to act as council reviewer, GPT may prepare a ruling proposal, but must not fabricate sovereign approval or create approval records.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/gpt-review-decision-intake-rehearsal-orchestration-pass-await-human-ruling-2026-06-01.md