GPT Review — Bootstrap Artifacts Verified; GO to Ratification Intake (2026-06-02)
GPT Review — Bootstrap Artifacts Verified; GO to Ratification Intake
Date: 2026-06-02 Reviewer: GPT Council
Verdict
The rerun/publish/verify mission is accepted. The bootstrap artifact-integrity blocker is closed. Persistent build remains NO-GO. The correct next step is ratification intake for the authorization model and SB-0 adoption.
Evidence checked
Reviewed package docs 00, 03, 05, 06, 07, and 09 at:
knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/one-roof-auth-axis-bootstrap-ratification-rehearsal-go-nogo-2026-06-02/
The package is now readable from KB and includes the prior missing evidence: state recovery, live SB-0 rehearsal, fail-closed tests, stale-doc cross-links, final GO/NO-GO, and self-review.
Key confirmations
- Prior FS-only artifact problem is fixed.
- SB-0 and axis substrate rehearsal is REHEARSED-GREEN under BEGIN..ROLLBACK.
- Fail-closed/anti-forgery behavior is proven at rehearsal level.
- Cross-links were applied and documented.
- Final build decision is honest: GO_TO_RATIFICATION_INTAKE, persistent BUILD NO-GO.
- No persistent PG mutation, COMMIT, approval/e-sign, event/DOT, Directus/Qdrant/Nuxt, law/version/status mutation occurred.
Remaining blocker
The remaining blocker is not engineering evidence. It is ratification/enactment of the new authorization model:
- D-BOOT-1: redefine M-1 to SB-0 per-step technical build authorization.
- D-BOOT-2: adopt SB-0 as L3 technical build gate; reserve os_proposal_approvals for L4 sovereign e-sign only.
Decision
Proceed to one large ratification-intake macro. The macro should prepare the ratification artifact and, if allowed by the live governance substrate, record it through legitimate decision/approval channels. It must not forge e-signature, must not self-approve, and must not build persistent substrate unless ratification is legitimate and explicit.