GPT Review — Axis/Auth Operational Hardening PASS; Not Build Yet

Date: 2026-06-02 Reviewer: GPT Council

Verdict

The 2026-06-02 hardening package is accepted as operationally coherent and build-ready at the design level. It should not yet proceed directly to persistent code/build because the package itself correctly identifies a bootstrap gate: ratification of the new authorization model and SB-0/M-1 redefinition.

Evidence checked

Reviewed key docs from one-roof-axis-auth-proposal-operational-hardening-build-ready-design-2026-06-02/: 00, 02, 03, 04, 05, 09, 11, 13, 15. These confirm the package is not merely schema-driven; it now reasons from operational workflows: approval, axis storage, proposal/review, governance coverage, UI projection, and Phase-1 rebuild impact.

What is accepted

• L0–L4 authorization model is now concrete enough for SB-0 rehearsal/build planning.
• governance_build_authorization / verifier model is designed at build-ready level.
• Axis Registry and Axis Assignment are designed at build-ready level.
• Topic semantics are treated as bounded uncertainty, not solved by governance alone.
• Reconstruction and containment axes are deterministic/integrity-tested.
• Proposal workflow is PG-native/hybrid and agent-friendly without external Git dependency.
• Governance auto-coverage and UI projection contracts are sufficiently specified for next-stage rehearsal.

Remaining before code/build

The only remaining pre-build blocker is not general design; it is controlled bootstrap:

1. Ratify the authorization model redefinition: os_proposal_approvals remains L4-only; M-1 becomes per-step technical build authorization through SB-0.
2. Rehearse SB-0 and axis storage DDL under BEGIN..ROLLBACK against live PG.
3. Patch the implementation-index/handoff so future build agents start from the new model, not stale M-1/e-sign assumptions.
4. Produce a final GO/NO-GO build authorization packet after rehearsal.

Decision

Do not start persistent build yet. Run one large final bootstrap macro that combines ratification intake, live rehearsal, stale-doc patching, and final build authorization. If that macro passes, proceed to controlled build.