KB-2B86

GPT Handoff — IU Text-as-Code Smart-Brick Foundation Gap & Next Requirements (2026-06-01)

4 min read Revision 1
gptiuinformation-unittext-as-codesmart-brickhandoff2026-06-01

GPT Handoff — IU / Miếng thông tin Text-as-Code Smart-Brick Foundation: Gap & Next Requirements

Date: 2026-06-01 Reviewer: GPT Council

Core correction

Prior claims that the Information Unit / miếng thông tin foundation was essentially done must be treated as incomplete. The system has many important foundations, but it is not yet a full Text-as-Code smart-brick substrate capable of safely powering agent automation, workflow configuration, DOT execution, current-context resolution, impact analysis, build/release, and governance coverage at scale.

User intent

The Information Unit must become the common substrate for system automation, not merely a text chunking mechanism. It must support configuration-first automation where complex processes, including multi-step agent/DOT workflows, can be assembled and executed from governed IU/config rather than custom code.

Existing strengths to reuse

  • Unitization: information_unit / text unit / miếng thông tin.
  • Stable identity: canonical_address, entity_code, birth_registry, collection_registry.
  • Versioning foundation: unit_version, lifecycle_status, versioning profile.
  • Schema validation: PG schema, gates, CHECK constraints, policies.
  • Registries/catalogs: collection_registry, meta_catalog, birth_registry, dot_tools, entity_species.
  • Graph/dependency foundations: universal_edges, context graph, context-pack.
  • Health/tooling foundations: system health checks, DOT tools, migration/report packs.
  • Review/governance foundation: Điều 20 review-before-execution style.

Major missing or weak capabilities

The uploaded note identifies that current text-as-code is missing or weak in: diff/patch/merge/blame/revert; pull request/change request workflow; test suite coverage per IU; dependency impact analysis; build/render pipeline; package/module system; typed edge contract; semantic linting; merge/conflict resolution; release/version bundles; and a robust multi-axis traceability pack.

Required target

Design and later implement an IU Text-as-Code Smart-Brick Foundation that can serve as:

  1. current-context resolver;
  2. governed source-of-truth for laws/designs/prompts/workflows/DOT specs/UI contracts;
  3. text-as-code proposal/review/merge substrate;
  4. dependency and impact graph;
  5. configurable workflow/automation substrate;
  6. build/render/release substrate;
  7. test/semantic-lint substrate;
  8. agent action preflight/gate substrate;
  9. governance coverage and orphan/anarchy detection substrate;
  10. integration point for external tools such as OPA/Temporal/LangGraph only as adapters, not as competing SSOTs.

Important principle

Do not hardcode this foundation for a single need such as prompt context. Build it as a general IU substrate for every future text/config/process/agent/DOT automation need. Current IU axes must be treated as examples only; future axes must be data-governed and open-ended.

After One-Roof Governance law hardening is accepted, run a dedicated macro:

IU_TEXT_AS_CODE_SMART_BRICK_FOUNDATION_AUDIT_AND_MASTER_DESIGN

Scope:

  • recover all IU/Text-as-Code existing designs and live PG state;
  • verify what is truly implemented vs design-only;
  • map gaps against IT text-as-code capabilities;
  • design IU current resolver, supersession, context receipt, proposal/merge, impact graph, typed edges, semantic lint, build/release, package/module model, workflow automation config model, and agent/DOT execution gate;
  • ensure all under One-Roof Governance and open-axis coverage;
  • do not implement until design is reviewed.
Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/gpt-handoff-iu-text-as-code-smart-brick-foundation-gap-and-next-requirements-2026-06-01.md