KB-76BE

FIX7 P0 Pre-Execution Governance Fold Readiness (2026-06-11)

4 min read Revision 1

FIX7 P0 — Pre-Execution Governance Fold Readiness (2026-06-11)

Macro: FIX7_P0_PRE_EXECUTION_HARDENING_AND_GOVERNANCE_CONSOLIDATION_MACRO_2026_06_11
Authority: NON_AUTHORITY governance bookkeeping. Applies no canonical fold.
Decision: FOLD_READY_PACKET_ONLY (macro Option 2). APPLY_NOW = NO.

Canonical baseline (untouched)

Object registry JSON tool-kiem-thu-object-registry-2026-06-10.json rev20, body max literal TKT-OBJ-224 (confirmed by a fresh scan of the registry JSON — highest id present = 224).
Registry MD rev22; 00-index.md rev114.
None of these were modified by this macro.

C. Governance fold table

range	source addendum	readable?	collision?	orphan?	fold status
225–262	older TKT (225–240 FIX7/TKT-v0.2, 241–253 real-N6, 254–262 v0.2 completeness)	yes	no	no	READY
263–304	NVSZ / interleaved T1/T2 (263–272, 273–288, 289–304)	yes	no	no	READY
305–325	T1 authority input (N7/N8/P7 prep)	yes	no	no	READY
326–342	TKT Base pack	yes	no	no	READY
343–377	T1 implementation planning	yes	no	no	READY
378–388	T2 parallel support (self 388)	yes	no	no	READY
389–406	T1 dry-run/execution-readiness	yes	no	no	READY
407–412	T1 Codex evidence bundle	yes	no	no	READY
413–417	T1 workspace evidence sync	yes	no	no	READY
418–429	T2 independent review	yes	no	no	READY
430–441	this macro (hardening + governance)	yes	no	no	READY_PENDING_PUBLISH

Contiguity: 225..429 is fully contiguous — zero gaps, zero overlaps. This macro extends to 441, above the prior ceiling 429. Collision scan vs canonical (max 224) + all reserved ranges + a KB search for any reservation above 429: 0 collisions, nothing previously reserved above 429.

Why not apply the canonical fold now (Option 2, not Option 1)

The canonical registry/index fold is owner/GPT-only and carries standing blockers TKT-BASE-GOV-FOLD-1 and V02-NVSZ-GOV-FOLD-1.
This macro's host is T1 OR T2 with live concurrent lanes; rewriting the ~55KB registry JSON now risks a write-race that could corrupt audit history.
The macro instructs: if the fold is safe but risky due to live lanes, choose FOLD_READY_PACKET_ONLY.

So the fold is ready (contiguous, collision-free, orphan-free, readable) but not applied.

D. Safety boundary table

action	production risk	implementation risk	allowed now?
publish hardening patch packet (KB docs)	none	none	YES (done)
reserve TKT-OBJ-430..441 via standalone addendum	none	none	YES (done, APPLY_NOW=NO)
apply canonical registry/index fold 225..441	none (KB governance only)	none	NO — owner/GPT, T1/T2-quiescent
any production mutation / impl execution / REAL_RUN/QT001/cutover	HIGH	HIGH	NO — forbidden in this lane

Codex anti-duplication audit — KB sync

CODEX_ANTI_DUP_AUDIT_KB_SYNC_NOT_CONFIRMED: the Codex anti-dup audit packet, current-state, and checkpoint are not found in KB. The user-provided result CODEX_T2_FIX7_REVIEW_ANTI_DUPLICATION_AUDIT_PASS (tree e319da46…a751e) is recorded as a local Codex result only. It is not needed for any mutation in this macro and does not block hardening or fold.