KB-5A87

FIX7 P0 — No-Production Implementation-Execution & Review — Report (2026-06-12)

8 min read Revision 1
tool-kiem-thufix7p0no-productionexecutionreport2026-06-12
<!-- DOC_STATUS: ACTIVE_NON_AUTHORITY -->

FIX7 P0 — No-Production Implementation-Execution & Review — Report (2026-06-12)

  • Lane: FIX7_P0_NO_PRODUCTION_IMPLEMENTATION_EXECUTION_AND_REVIEW_LANE_MACRO_2026_06_12
  • Final status: FIX7_P0_NO_PRODUCTION_IMPLEMENTATION_EXECUTION_AND_REVIEW_APPLIED
  • Delegation consumed: AUTHORIZE_IMPLEMENTATION_EXECUTION_NO_PRODUCTION (user → GPT).
  • Authority: IMPLEMENTATION_EXECUTION_NO_PRODUCTION (KB/governance only). Authorizes no production action.
  • Production mutation: NO · REAL_RUN/QT001/cutover: NO · Codex: NO · Owner-ask: NO.

1. What was executed (no-production)

Two additive KB documents were created — the no-production "implementation" step that makes the Codex-sealed FIX7 P0 birth-blueprint operative (by reference) and governs the new objects:

  • M-1 fix7-p0-operative-birth-blueprint-2026-06-12.md — ABSENT → rev1, sha256 c1e23a30…84e9.
  • M-2 …-governance-addendum-2026-06-12.md — ABSENT → rev1, sha256 d58cc8a9…a090; reserves TKT-OBJ-442..461 (PROPOSED, APPLY_NOW=NO).

The P7-pinned canonicalizer SSOT was not modified. Its own marker states it is "hashed as full normalized content", so inserting an in-document operative marker (planning surface 1) would have broken the P7 pin 49c386a9…b734d0. Per the macro's "treat ambiguous/risky as forbidden" rule, that surface was deliberately excluded; operative status is carried additively by M-1. Pin preserved by construction.

2. Preflight (Workstream A) — all verified

input verification
Canonical fold 225..441 TKT_CANONICAL_GOVERNANCE_FOLD_225_441_APPLIED (current-state + owner note)
Rollback-validator hardening packet reconstructed on disk byte-exact to tree 59788d04…e20e4; selftest PASS; 7/7 probes fail-closed
Dry-run/execution-readiness packet 02b200e5…94e6 (referenced; DR-1 seal-vs-bytes PASS frozen)
T2 independent review T2_FIX7_P0_DRYRUN_EXECUTION_READINESS_REVIEW_PASS
Authority seal N7 efb0c574…, N8 daa70c39…, P7 9ddb27c3…, seal tree 3890cd34… (P7 alone ≠ exec authority)
Planning packet tree f470d0d0…0fe8f

3. Table A — delegation & authority (see delegation-and-authority-lock.json)

AUTHORIZE_IMPLEMENTATION_EXECUTION_NO_PRODUCTION (GPT-delegated by owner) satisfies the OPT-4 / FIX7-P0-PLAN-EXEC-AUTH-1 gate for the no-production lane only. P7 is not treated as production authority. FIX7-P0-DRYRUN-PROD-ROLLBACK-1 (production rollback proof) is not required for a no-production lane and is carried into the production blocker map.

4. Table B — scope lock (see scope-lock.json)

No-production scope proven: the only mutations are two additive KB documents; no PG/Directus/system_issues/registry-row/CI command was issued; the rollback proof ran in a disposable mktemp workspace with no production connection. UNKNOWN/production surfaces (planning 5/6/7/8/10) were treated as forbidden and excluded; the no-production target is isolated from them (macro §5 satisfied).

5. Table C — execution plan (see execution-plan.json)

S0 preflight → S1 seal-vs-bytes recheck (read-only) → S2 staging rollback proof → S3 mandatory hardened gate → S4 execution probes → S5 publish M-1 → S6 publish M-2 → S7 review + blocker map. The FORBIDDEN row (production/REAL_RUN/QT001/cutover/etc.) was NOT attempted.

6. Table D — forbidden-surface proof (see forbidden-surface-proof.json)

16/16 forbidden surfaces UNTOUCHED / NOT_REQUESTED; any_forbidden_surface_attempted=false. No query_pg/directus_*/write_file/delete_document call was made; the only write tool used was upload_document against no-production KB paths.

7. Mandatory hardened rollback gate (Workstream D)

hardened_dryrun_validator.py (sha256 e6547e69…56c47) is the required gate. rollback_gate_driver.py proves overall PASS: (a) gate selftest PASS — real frozen T1 evidence passes, fabricated no-mutation rollback fails closed; (b) this macro's rollback evidence PASSES; (c) a fabricated no-mutation variant of this macro's own evidence FAILS CLOSED (ROLLBACK_APPLY_DID_NOT_MUTATE:RB-EXEC-1). Both executed mutations: before ABSENT → after_apply real → after_rollback ABSENT (restored), proven in disposable staging. production_rollback_status = NOT_APPLICABLE.

8. Execution-specific bad-input probes (Workstream E)

execution_bad_input_probes.py15/15 fail-closed, control allowed, any_fail_open=false, no token leak. All 15 required classes covered (production target, REAL_RUN, QT001/apply, permit/activation/repoint/cutover, prod PG, prod Directus, prod system_issues, prod CI/deploy, secrets, evidence deletion, missing delegation, rollback-no-mutation, apply==before, missing rollback proof, PASS-while-forbidden-surface). Each invalid request emits a reject code, never a PASS/seal token.

9. Post-execution review (Workstream F) & production blocker map (Workstream G)

post-execution-review.json — PER-1..PER-10 all PASS (NO_PRODUCTION_EXECUTION_CLEAN). Scope intact, forbidden surfaces untouched, gate passed, probes fail-closed, rollback exists, no production mutation, P7 pin & prior verdicts intact, governance correct, no overclaim. production-readiness-blocker-map.json enumerates 7 production blockers (birth-pipeline surface, CI/deploy scope, production rollback proof, REAL_RUN, QT001/apply/permit/activation/repoint/cutover, production OPT-4, operator input) — none resolved here.

10. Evidence packet

fix7-p0-no-production-implementation-execution-and-review-packet-2026-06-12/ — 22 files, packet_tree 72b24b8a…787bb2, RERUN.sh → PASS, KB round-trip byte-exact.

11. Governance

Objects TKT-OBJ-442..461 (PROPOSED, standalone addendum, above ceiling 441, APPLY_NOW=NO, 0 collisions). Canonical registry JSON / MD / 00-index NOT modified; no canonical fold.

12. Final self-check

Delegation recorded ✓ · preflight verified ✓ · no-production scope proven ✓ · no production mutation ✓ · no REAL_RUN/QT001/cutover ✓ · no prod PG/Directus/system_issues ✓ · no prod CI/deploy ✓ · no secrets/credentials change ✓ · no evidence deletion ✓ · hardened validator used ✓ · 15 execution probes fail-closed ✓ · forbidden surfaces untouched ✓ · post-execution review complete ✓ · production blocker map complete ✓ · status consistent with evidence ✓.

13. Remaining blockers & minimal next macro

Open (production-only, owner/operator): FIX7-P0-PROD-BIRTH-SURFACE-1, FIX7-P0-PROD-CI-SCOPE-1, FIX7-P0-DRYRUN-PROD-ROLLBACK-1, FIX7-P0-PLAN-REALRUN-1, FIX7-P0-PLAN-SEPARATE-AUTH-1, FIX7-P0-PROD-OPT4-1, FIX7-P0-OPERATOR-INPUT-1. Plus owner/GPT-only TKT-OBJ-442..461 canonical fold. Minimal next macro: owner/operator production decision (default HOLD); if ever pursued, a separately-gated production macro after production OPT-4 + surface scoping + production rollback proof + separate REAL_RUN/QT001/cutover grants.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/fix7-p0-no-production-implementation-execution-and-review-report-2026-06-12.md