FIX7 P0 Codex Review Evidence Bundle — Report (2026-06-11)
FIX7 P0 Codex Review Evidence Bundle — Report (2026-06-11)
- Host: T1 / CLAUDE CODE / MYTHOS · Lane:
FIX7_P0_CODEX_REVIEW_EVIDENCE_BUNDLE_REPAIR_MACRO_2026_06_11 - Final status:
FIX7_P0_CODEX_REVIEW_EVIDENCE_BUNDLE_READY - Authority of this doc:
EVIDENCE_BUNDLE_NON_AUTHORITY. Authorizes nothing; mutates no production. - Production mutation: NO · Implementation execution: NO · REAL_RUN/QT001/cutover: NO
- Codex re-asked: NO · Registry/index folded: NO · N7/N8/P7 altered: NO · Dry-run verdict altered: NO
1. Why this macro ran
Codex returned CODEX_FIX7_P0_DRYRUN_EXECUTION_READINESS_REVIEW_BLOCKED. Codex did not reject
the dry-run content; it was blocked because the planning packet, dry-run packet, TKT Base / T2
governance files, and/or the KB listing were missing from its review workspace or unreachable due
to an MCP handshake timeout. This macro builds a single, discoverable Codex-readable evidence
bundle so the independent execution-readiness review can be re-run without missing artifacts.
2. Codex blocked-review diagnosis
The three macro-listed Codex blocked-review artifacts are not_found in KB (semantic search found no such Codex review document):
…/current-state/reports/fix7-codex-p0-dryrun-execution-readiness-review-2026-06-11.md…/architecture/checkpoint-codex-fix7-p0-dryrun-execution-readiness-review-2026-06-11.md…/architecture/codex-fix7-p0-dryrun-execution-readiness-review-2026-06-11/00-readme-first.md
Classification: CODEX_BLOCKED_REVIEW_ARTIFACT_NOT_FOUND_IN_KB. These are the OUTPUT of the
blocked review, not inputs — they were never published because the review was blocked. They are
recorded honestly and not fabricated (macro §5). Root cause:
CODEX_REVIEW_WORKSPACE_EVIDENCE_ACCESS_FAILURE (access/handshake, not data/content).
3. Evidence located and verified (all required inputs present)
| group | root | files | tree / digest | result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry-run + exec-readiness packet | …/fix7-p0-dryrun-and-execution-readiness-packet-2026-06-11/ |
21 | 02b200e5…94e6 |
recompute PASS |
| Implementation-planning packet | …/fix7-p0-implementation-planning-packet-2026-06-11/ |
16 | f470d0d0…0fe8f |
recompute PASS |
| Codex authority seal | …/codex-fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-seal-reauthor-with-valid-a5-2026-06-11/ |
19 | 3890cd34…12a234 |
recompute PASS |
| ↳ N7 | n7-approval-event.json | efb0c574…1853d32 |
match | |
| ↳ N8 | n8-detached-codex-seal.json | daa70c39…6117e1a1 |
match | |
| ↳ P7 | p7-authoritative-pin.json | 9ddb27c3…034550 |
match | |
| TKT Base pack | …/tkt-base-structural-evidence-governance-pack-2026-06-11/ |
30 | — | present |
Plus 12 standalone dry-run reports, planning checkpoint+current-state, seal checkpoint+current- state, TKT Base checkpoint+current-state, and 4 T2 support files (template, fold-preflight, collision/orphan-audit, support current-state) — all readable.
Trees were recomputed by fetching each HASH_MANIFEST.txt full from KB, writing to local disk,
and shasum -a 256 — every value equalled both the recorded packet_tree.sha256 and the macro
expectation (byte-exact). RERUN.sh over the three fetched manifests → RERUN_RESULT: PASS.
4. File-readability tally
- Required review-input directories listed and present: 4 (21+16+19+30 files).
- Required standalone docs read and readable: 22 / 22.
- Tree/manifest/digest files fetched and verified: 9.
- Required inputs missing/unreadable: 0.
- Codex blocked-review OUTPUT paths not_found: 3 (expected; not inputs).
5. The bundle
Root: knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/fix7-p0-codex-review-evidence-bundle-2026-06-11/
(13 files, bundle packet_tree.sha256 = 1b824b911bdbc9cce43280f288abd702aebb42211b59ffbff253c2d06533ab26).
Contents: README_FOR_CODEX.md, REQUIRED_READ_ORDER.md, EVIDENCE_PATH_MAP.json,
EXPECTED_HASHES_AND_TREES.json, RECONSTRUCTION_COMMANDS.md, CODEX_BLOCKED_REVIEW_DIAGNOSIS.md,
MISSING_OR_UNREADABLE_PATHS.json, HASH_MANIFEST.txt, packet_tree.sha256, manifest.json,
commands.sh, RERUN.sh, exit_codes.json.
Proofs: bash commands.sh → OVERALL PASS (exit 0); bash RERUN.sh (with the three external
manifests fetched from KB) → RERUN_RESULT: PASS (exit 0); all 11 authored files re-fetched from
KB byte-identical (trailing newlines preserved); KB directory listing shows 13/13 files.
6. Object allocation
TKT-OBJ-407..412 (6 objects), PROPOSED, APPLY_NOW=NO, via standalone governance addendum,
strictly above ceiling 406. No canonical registry JSON / 00-index fold (macro §4; T1/T2 fold
race remains open). See the governance addendum for the per-object mapping and collision check.
7. Final status: FIX7_P0_CODEX_REVIEW_EVIDENCE_BUNDLE_READY
All required T1/Codex/TKT files are listed and readable from KB; packet trees recorded and verified; commands/RERUN included; the missing Codex blocked-review artifacts are classified as access-only (not inputs); Codex can re-run the review from a single bundle root; no production or implementation mutation occurred.
8. Remaining blockers (carried, owner/operator-only — unchanged by this macro)
FIX7-P0-PLAN-EXEC-AUTH-1(owner OPT-4),-SURFACE-1/-2,-REALRUN-1,-SEPARATE-AUTH-1,FIX7-P0-DRYRUN-PROD-ROLLBACK-1.- New, this macro:
FIX7-P0-CODEX-REVIEW-ROUTE-1— routing the re-run to Codex is an owner action; this macro does not re-ask Codex. Does not block production. Blocks only the Codex re-review step.
9. Minimal next macro
Owner routes the fresh Codex execution-readiness re-review by handing Codex this bundle root as
its single entry point (README_FOR_CODEX.md → REQUIRED_READ_ORDER.md). If Codex returns PASS,
the owner's post-dry-run execution decision (default HOLD) proceeds per the dry-run packet's
decision template — implementation execution remains separately gated (OPT-4 + production scoping).