KB-238B rev 3

FIX7 N7/N8/P7 Authority-Input — Object Registry Addendum (TKT-OBJ-305..325, 2026-06-11)

7 min read Revision 3
<!-- DOC_STATUS: ACTIVE_AUTHORITY -->

FIX7 N7/N8/P7 Authority-Input — Object Registry Addendum (TKT-OBJ-305..325, 2026-06-11)

Authority of THIS doc: KB-level governance record (NOT a production registry insertion). No PG/Directus/birth_registry/system_issues row was created. Macro: FIX7_N7_N8_P7_AUTHORITY_INPUT_PREPARATION_MACRO_2026_06_11 (T1) Codex consulted: NO · Owner approval requested: NO · Production mutation: NO Authority class of objects: PROVISIONAL_NON_AUTHORITY (prepares inputs; authors no seal).

0. Collision renumber note (289..309 → 305..325)

This lane initially drafted TKT-OBJ-289..309. A live cross-lane scan then found a concurrent T2 NVSZ root-provisioning dry-run lane had already reserved TKT-OBJ-289..304 in a separate v0.2-hardening governance addendum (…/dev/v0.2-hardening/governance/v02-nvsz-root-provisioning-object-governance-addendum-2026-06-11.md, TKT-OBJ-304 self; PROPOSED/NON_AUTHORITY; not in canonical registry JSON). That addendum is not visible in the canonical registry MD I first read (it lives on a separate v0.2 path), which is why the initial draft collided on 289..304. Per the macro's collision rule, this lane renumbered its whole block to TKT-OBJ-305..325, strictly above the T2 NVSZ ceiling 304. The packet manifest.json and tree pin were re-pinned accordingly; canonical packet tree = ac6793194510dec0adf8f13878cdf6ad716a2ae346ea95cc861deea5715db0d0.

1. Why an addendum (no 60KB rewrite)

Following the established pattern, new objects are registered here rather than rewriting the canonical 60KB registry JSON (tool-kiem-thu-object-registry-2026-06-10.json, rev20, valid max id 224). Cross-lane reserved ranges as of this lane: T1 = 182..200, 208..216, 225..253, 273..288; T2 = 201..207, 217..224, 254..262, 263..272 (NVSZ escrow, PROPOSED), 289..304 (NVSZ root-provisioning dry-run, PROPOSED). New ceiling before this lane = 304. This lane therefore takes TKT-OBJ-305..325. Collision check: no live object at or above 305 exists; 305..325 are free.

2. Allocation

ID Object Path Type
TKT-OBJ-305 Authority-input preparation report …/architecture/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-preparation-report-2026-06-11.md report
TKT-OBJ-306 N7 envelope N6-availability update report …/architecture/fix7-n7-envelope-n6-availability-update-report-2026-06-11.md report
TKT-OBJ-307 Authority input roster (md) …/architecture/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-roster-2026-06-11.md roster
TKT-OBJ-308 Authority input roster (json) …/architecture/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-roster-2026-06-11.json roster
TKT-OBJ-309 Owner authority decision packet (md) …/architecture/fix7-owner-authority-decision-packet-2026-06-11.md decision-packet
TKT-OBJ-310 Owner authority decision packet (json) …/architecture/fix7-owner-authority-decision-packet-2026-06-11.json decision-packet
TKT-OBJ-311 N8 report-set candidate (md) …/architecture/fix7-n8-report-set-candidate-2026-06-11.md n8-candidate
TKT-OBJ-312 N8 report-set candidate (json) …/architecture/fix7-n8-report-set-candidate-2026-06-11.json n8-candidate
TKT-OBJ-313 P7 authority ID proposal (md) …/architecture/fix7-p7-authority-id-proposal-2026-06-11.md p7-proposal
TKT-OBJ-314 P7 authority ID proposal (json) …/architecture/fix7-p7-authority-id-proposal-2026-06-11.json p7-proposal
TKT-OBJ-315 Bad-input probes report …/architecture/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-bad-probes-2026-06-11.md report
TKT-OBJ-316 Checkpoint …/architecture/checkpoint-fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-packet-2026-06-11.md checkpoint
TKT-OBJ-317 Current-state …/current-state/reports/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-packet-current-state-2026-06-11.md current-state
TKT-OBJ-318 Authority-input packet (directory, tree ac679319…b0d0) …/architecture/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-packet-2026-06-11/ packet
TKT-OBJ-319 Packet README …/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-packet-2026-06-11/README_FOR_OWNER_AND_CODEX.md doc
TKT-OBJ-320 authority_input_validator.py …/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-packet-2026-06-11/authority_input_validator.py executable
TKT-OBJ-321 stale_prose_detector.py …/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-packet-2026-06-11/stale_prose_detector.py executable
TKT-OBJ-322 authority_firewall.py …/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-packet-2026-06-11/authority_firewall.py executable
TKT-OBJ-323 bad_input_probes.py …/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-packet-2026-06-11/bad_input_probes.py executable
TKT-OBJ-324 Packet gate scripts (commands.sh, RERUN.sh) …/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-packet-2026-06-11/{commands.sh,RERUN.sh} executable
TKT-OBJ-325 This governance addendum …/architecture/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-object-registry-addendum-2026-06-11.md governance

Packet machine inputs (owner-decision-template.json, report-set-candidate.json, p7-id-proposal.json, authority-input-roster.json, n7-envelope-n6-status.json, manifest.json, exit_codes.json, HASH_MANIFEST.txt, packet_tree.sha256) are covered transitively by the packet tree pin (TKT-OBJ-318), ac6793194510dec0adf8f13878cdf6ad716a2ae346ea95cc861deea5715db0d0.

3. Range ledger (post-this-addendum)

  • T1: 182..200, 208..216, 225..253, 273..288, 305..325.
  • T2: 201..207, 217..224, 254..262; T2 NVSZ 263..272 (escrow, PROPOSED) + 289..304 (root-provisioning dry-run, PROPOSED) — both PENDING fold (V02-NVSZ-GOV-FOLD-1).
  • Canonical registry JSON rev20 (max id 224) NOT rewritten. New max allocated id: 325.

4. Non-authority statement

These objects prepare authority inputs for the next owner/Codex authoring phase. None is an official seal, an official pin, or a promotion. N6 digest unchanged; N-number semantics unchanged; no N7/N8/P7 authored; no implementation or production action; no Codex/owner consultation; v0.2 not promoted; T2 v0.2 framework not mutated.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/fix7-n7-n8-p7-authority-input-object-registry-addendum-2026-06-11.md