KB-8D42

CHECK F — Feasibility / Scale Final Acceptance

3 min read Revision 1
fix7architecturecodexfinal-design-approvalcheck-ffeasibilityscale

06 — CHECK F: Feasibility / Scale Final Acceptance

Verdict: FEASIBILITY_SCALE_FINAL_ACCEPTED

What CHECK F requires

Feasible on PG16.13 + pgcrypto; object-count-independent; no hot-path full scan; no row-by-row apply path; no unbounded hash over runtime object data; no unbounded dependency recursion; no production-blocking locks; rollback returns safe-blocked state; implementation can proceed later without guessing, after explicit authorization.

Evidence (T1 doc 08)

Check Finding Result
Implementable on PG16.13 + pgcrypto SHA-256 (pgcrypto digest), canonical jsonb, standard DDL / range partitioning / typed DOMAINs (qt001_cp.sha256, positive_bigint, nonnegative_bigint) ACCEPTED
Object-count-independent hashes are over bounded membership (per run / per epoch), not over all objects ACCEPTED
No hot-path full scan membership scoped by run_id / control_epoch on FK columns; PK-terminated orders ACCEPTED
No row-by-row apply path introduced micro-patch is hash-spec only; no new apply path ACCEPTED
No unbounded hash over runtime object data aggregates bounded by sealed requirement sets / ACTIVE required capabilities / per-epoch activations ACCEPTED
No unbounded dependency recursion none ACCEPTED
No production-blocking locks READ-ONLY; nothing applied ACCEPTED
Retention/partitioning coherent 7 high-volume event/result tables range-partitioned on immutable event time from sealed storage-class; identity anchors unpartitioned for stable inbound FK identity ACCEPTED
Rollback returns safe-blocked state new version / append-only; consolidated reverse order; all live steps remain blocked ACCEPTED
Implementation can proceed later without guessing every H04/H05/H02 sub-payload key, membership predicate, and order column resolves to a named table.column (DDL-grounded) ACCEPTED

On the P-04 fail-closed operational cost

Adding a performance index requires a sealed #20 manifest-version bump + quorum. T1 and Codex agree this is a deliberate operational trade-off for an immutable authority surface — a cost, not a scale risk. ACCEPTED.

Determination

The design is feasible on the target stack, object-count-independent, free of hot-path scans / row-by-row apply / unbounded hashing or recursion / blocking locks, rolls back to a safe-blocked state, and is byte-grounded enough that the later (separately authorized) implementation-planning phase can proceed without guessing.

Result: FEASIBILITY_SCALE_FINAL_ACCEPTED.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/reports/architecture/codex-fix7-final-design-approval-2026-06-08/06-feasibility-scale-final-acceptance.md