01 — CHECK A: T1 Final PASS Integrity

Verdict: T1_FINAL_PASS_CONFIRMED

What CHECK A requires

• T1 returned DESIGN_READY_FOR_CODEX_FINAL_APPROVAL.
• T1 checkpoint and the 11 report docs are readable.
• No blocking proposal remains.
• OBS-01 is editorial / non-blocking.

Evidence

Requirement	Observed	Result
Final status	DESIGN_READY_FOR_CODEX_FINAL_APPROVAL stated in T1 checkpoint and …/10-final-verdict.md	PASS
Checkpoint readable	checkpoint-t1-fix7-final-short-review-after-cp06-patch-2026-06-08.md read in full (content_length 4,966)	PASS
11 report docs readable	…/t1-fix7-final-short-review-after-cp06-patch-2026-06-08/00..10 all read in full (no truncation)	PASS
Per-track verdicts present	P-01 P01_VERIFIED · P-02 P02_VERIFIED · P-03 P03_VERIFIED · P-04 P04_VERIFIED · NON_REGRESSION_VERIFIED · ZERO_HARDCODE_VERIFIED · PG_NATIVE_DRIVEN_VERIFIED · FEASIBILITY_SCALE_VERIFIED	PASS
Blocking proposals	…/09-proposal-package-if-any.md = NO_REMAINING_PROPOSALS (0 blocking, 0 advisory requiring action)	PASS
OBS-01 nature	Editorial, severity = editorial (NON-blocking); "blocks final approval: NO"; a rationale-prose nuance in CP-06 patch doc 01 vs the UNIQUE evidence_registry.artifact_sha256	PASS

Integrity cross-check (no contradiction)

T1's headline (DESIGN_READY_FOR_CODEX_FINAL_APPROVAL), its eight track verdicts, its "exactly 27 / 11 / 0 / 0" invariant line, and its "no implementation; Stage 2.6B / permit / REAL_RUN / QT001 apply remain blocked" posture are mutually consistent across the readme (00), the four proposal docs (01–04), non-regression (05), the three scan docs (06–08), the proposal package (09), the final verdict (10), and the checkpoint. No internal contradiction was found in the final review, so — per the quota-saving directive — no old issue is reopened.

Determination

T1's final PASS is genuine, complete, readable, and free of blocking residue. OBS-01 is correctly classed editorial and does not gate approval.

Result: T1_FINAL_PASS_CONFIRMED.