KB-603F

FIX7 Blueprint — Article-14 Executable-Evidence Check Report (5-lens, 2026-06-10)

6 min read Revision 1
tool-kiem-thufix7article-14executable-evidencecheck-report5-lensnon-gating2026-06-10

FIX7 Blueprint — Article-14 Executable-Evidence Check Report (5-lens)

  • Date: 2026-06-10 · Object ID: TKT-OBJ-043 · Authority: evidence-only, non-gating (decision_effect=NONE, may_gate=false) · Codex: NOT consulted (this is an internal Tool-Kiem-Thu check that re-uses and structures Codex Recheck-8, never overrides it)
  • Target: T1 FIX7 Existing-System Refactor Execution Blueprint + Codex Recheck-8 (FIX7_REFACTOR_BLUEPRINT_CODEX_RECHECK_8_NEEDS_T1_FIX)
  • Input: fix7-blueprint-checkable-package-2026-06-10.md (claims C-01..C-07); lenses: article14-executable-evidence-5lens-detector-spec-2026-06-10.md
  • Method: read-only KB/native verification. No production mutation, no implementation, no seal, no FIX7 run, no CI re-run, no Mac-local. This check is a static/cross-reference Article-14 adequacy analysis, NOT a fresh sandbox execution of the SSOT (running the SSOT remains the absent capability — that absence is the finding).

1. First-hand evidence captured by this macro

  • list_documents of the blueprint folder → 14 documents, every one .md (00–12 + canonicalizer-fix7-canon-v1-ssot.md). No .py file exists. → directly confirms L1/L3 for artifact A1.
  • Recheck-8 decisive run (quoted): python3 canonicalizer-fix7-canon-v1-ssot.py --selftestpython: can't open file '…/canonicalizer-fix7-canon-v1-ssot.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directoryexit 2.
  • The only independently reproducible digest: membership = f2bda8effc7be19b54722828126b82d7d2d48bee5e5e5dc0c8f347ce210fe251.

2. Per-lens findings

L1 — Missing artifact → FAIL

  • A1 canonicalizer-fix7-canon-v1-ssot.py: ABSENT (first-hand). A3: 7 of 8 seal digests not produced. A4: envelope manifest builder absent.
  • Verdict MISSING_ARTIFACT. Maps Recheck-8 B CANONICALIZER_SSOT_FAIL, F, G BLOCKED.

L2 — Fake / unverified selftest → FAIL

  • C-02 "22/22 PASS, exit 0, reproduces f2bda8…fe251": unverifiable — the named file does not exist, so the claim cannot be reproduced; PASS was self-asserted against an embedded fence. Even at face value the 22 are narrow unit assertions that do NOT execute the production extractor, duplicate-marker handling, fence balance, envelope roster closure, the 8 digests, or detached-seal computation.
  • Verdict FAKE_OR_UNVERIFIED_SELFTEST, FLAG_PROSE_ONLY_PASS. Maps B/F.

L3 — Non-runnable command → FAIL

  • C-01: declared command exits 2 because A1 is absent. Structural non-runnability (not "merely not run here").
  • Verdict NON_RUNNABLE_COMMAND. Maps B.

L4 — Duplicate authority → NEEDS_FIX

  • C-03: direction correct (one SSOT declared, prose demoted via banners + G-NO-DUPLICATE-CANONICAL-AUTHORITY), but the guard is asserted, not executed; because the SSOT lacks production encoding/extractor logic, implementers must consult the demoted prose to seal → that prose remains effective authority → structural duplicate authority recreated.
  • C-06 (adjacent): detached seal protected only by a hash beside mutable content = mutable/self-recomputable authority.
  • Verdict DUPLICATE_AUTHORITY. Maps C NEEDS_FIX (+ A-residual/H/I).

L5 — Forbidden / unenforced scope → NEEDS_FIX

  • C-04: unit-level marker kind/literal validation works (unknown/mismatched/typo fail closed), but the whole-document behaviour is missing — no executable extractor enumerates markers, checks duplicate markers, validates fence balance/nesting/overlap, or scopes the boundary registry to "current authority only". The report claims duplicate markers fail closed but the SSOT code does not execute that rule.
  • Verdict FORBIDDEN_SCOPE / SCOPE_UNENFORCED. Maps E NEEDS_FIX.

3. Article-14 master verdict

CONSTITUTION_14_EXECUTABLE_CHECK_FAIL (Recheck-8 check F), driven by L1/L2/L3 on the single absent runnable artifact. This Tool-Kiem-Thu check agrees with and structures the authoritative Codex Recheck-8 verdict …NEEDS_T1_FIX; it adds no new authority and reverses nothing. No green verdict is issued.

4. Cross-reference table (lens → claim → Recheck-8 check → verdict)

Lens Claim Recheck-8 Verdict
L1 C-01, C-05 B, F, G FAIL
L2 C-02 B, F FAIL
L3 C-01 B FAIL
L4 C-03, C-06 C, A-res/H/I NEEDS_FIX
L5 C-04 E NEEDS_FIX
(accepted, not re-adjudicated) A, D, J ACCEPTED

5. Honesty / self-check (anti-self-defeat)

  • This report pastes real read-only evidence (14-doc all-.md listing; Recheck-8 exit-2) — no prose-only PASS (would trip L2).
  • This report + the checkable package are provisional-non-authority derived views — they are NOT a second canonical authority over the blueprint (would trip L4).
  • Scope honored: no framework build; check applied to this blueprint only (Recheck-8 K constraint).

Verdict

FIX7_ARTICLE14_EXECUTABLE_EVIDENCE_CHECK_FAIL (non-gating) — all 5 lens findings reproduced with read-only evidence, consistent with Codex Recheck-8; feeds the approval punch-list.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws/tool-kiem-thu/reports/fix7-blueprint-article14-executable-evidence-check-report-2026-06-10.md