KB-603F
FIX7 Blueprint — Article-14 Executable-Evidence Check Report (5-lens, 2026-06-10)
6 min read Revision 1
tool-kiem-thufix7article-14executable-evidencecheck-report5-lensnon-gating2026-06-10
FIX7 Blueprint — Article-14 Executable-Evidence Check Report (5-lens)
- Date: 2026-06-10 · Object ID: TKT-OBJ-043 · Authority:
evidence-only, non-gating (decision_effect=NONE,may_gate=false) · Codex: NOT consulted (this is an internal Tool-Kiem-Thu check that re-uses and structures Codex Recheck-8, never overrides it) - Target: T1 FIX7 Existing-System Refactor Execution Blueprint + Codex Recheck-8 (
FIX7_REFACTOR_BLUEPRINT_CODEX_RECHECK_8_NEEDS_T1_FIX) - Input:
fix7-blueprint-checkable-package-2026-06-10.md(claims C-01..C-07); lenses:article14-executable-evidence-5lens-detector-spec-2026-06-10.md - Method: read-only KB/native verification. No production mutation, no implementation, no seal, no FIX7 run, no CI re-run, no Mac-local. This check is a static/cross-reference Article-14 adequacy analysis, NOT a fresh sandbox execution of the SSOT (running the SSOT remains the absent capability — that absence is the finding).
1. First-hand evidence captured by this macro
list_documentsof the blueprint folder → 14 documents, every one.md(00–12 +canonicalizer-fix7-canon-v1-ssot.md). No.pyfile exists. → directly confirms L1/L3 for artifact A1.- Recheck-8 decisive run (quoted):
python3 canonicalizer-fix7-canon-v1-ssot.py --selftest→python: can't open file '…/canonicalizer-fix7-canon-v1-ssot.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory→ exit 2. - The only independently reproducible digest:
membership = f2bda8effc7be19b54722828126b82d7d2d48bee5e5e5dc0c8f347ce210fe251.
2. Per-lens findings
L1 — Missing artifact → FAIL
- A1
canonicalizer-fix7-canon-v1-ssot.py: ABSENT (first-hand). A3: 7 of 8 seal digests not produced. A4: envelope manifest builder absent. - Verdict
MISSING_ARTIFACT. Maps Recheck-8 BCANONICALIZER_SSOT_FAIL, F, GBLOCKED.
L2 — Fake / unverified selftest → FAIL
- C-02 "22/22 PASS, exit 0, reproduces f2bda8…fe251": unverifiable — the named file does not exist, so the claim cannot be reproduced; PASS was self-asserted against an embedded fence. Even at face value the 22 are narrow unit assertions that do NOT execute the production extractor, duplicate-marker handling, fence balance, envelope roster closure, the 8 digests, or detached-seal computation.
- Verdict
FAKE_OR_UNVERIFIED_SELFTEST,FLAG_PROSE_ONLY_PASS. Maps B/F.
L3 — Non-runnable command → FAIL
- C-01: declared command exits 2 because A1 is absent. Structural non-runnability (not "merely not run here").
- Verdict
NON_RUNNABLE_COMMAND. Maps B.
L4 — Duplicate authority → NEEDS_FIX
- C-03: direction correct (one SSOT declared, prose demoted via banners +
G-NO-DUPLICATE-CANONICAL-AUTHORITY), but the guard is asserted, not executed; because the SSOT lacks production encoding/extractor logic, implementers must consult the demoted prose to seal → that prose remains effective authority → structural duplicate authority recreated. - C-06 (adjacent): detached seal protected only by a hash beside mutable content = mutable/self-recomputable authority.
- Verdict
DUPLICATE_AUTHORITY. Maps CNEEDS_FIX(+ A-residual/H/I).
L5 — Forbidden / unenforced scope → NEEDS_FIX
- C-04: unit-level marker kind/literal validation works (unknown/mismatched/typo fail closed), but the whole-document behaviour is missing — no executable extractor enumerates markers, checks duplicate markers, validates fence balance/nesting/overlap, or scopes the boundary registry to "current authority only". The report claims duplicate markers fail closed but the SSOT code does not execute that rule.
- Verdict
FORBIDDEN_SCOPE / SCOPE_UNENFORCED. Maps ENEEDS_FIX.
3. Article-14 master verdict
CONSTITUTION_14_EXECUTABLE_CHECK_FAIL (Recheck-8 check F), driven by L1/L2/L3 on the single absent runnable artifact. This Tool-Kiem-Thu check agrees with and structures the authoritative Codex Recheck-8 verdict …NEEDS_T1_FIX; it adds no new authority and reverses nothing. No green verdict is issued.
4. Cross-reference table (lens → claim → Recheck-8 check → verdict)
| Lens | Claim | Recheck-8 | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | C-01, C-05 | B, F, G | FAIL |
| L2 | C-02 | B, F | FAIL |
| L3 | C-01 | B | FAIL |
| L4 | C-03, C-06 | C, A-res/H/I | NEEDS_FIX |
| L5 | C-04 | E | NEEDS_FIX |
| (accepted, not re-adjudicated) | — | A, D, J | ACCEPTED |
5. Honesty / self-check (anti-self-defeat)
- This report pastes real read-only evidence (14-doc all-
.mdlisting; Recheck-8 exit-2) — no prose-only PASS (would trip L2). - This report + the checkable package are
provisional-non-authorityderived views — they are NOT a second canonical authority over the blueprint (would trip L4). - Scope honored: no framework build; check applied to this blueprint only (Recheck-8 K constraint).
Verdict
FIX7_ARTICLE14_EXECUTABLE_EVIDENCE_CHECK_FAIL (non-gating) — all 5 lens findings reproduced with read-only evidence, consistent with Codex Recheck-8; feeds the approval punch-list.