KB-1535
FIX7 Authority Closure — Anti-Overclaim Scan (Self-Codex, 2026-06-10)
4 min read Revision 1
tool-kiem-thufix7authority-closureself-codexanti-overclaim2026-06-10
FIX7 Authority Closure — Anti-Overclaim Scan (Self-Codex)
- Date: 2026-06-10 · Authority of THIS doc: provisional-non-authority self-audit.
- Method: scanned all 10 authority-closure documents for the overclaim tokens the macro names — "approved", "sealed", "authorized implementation", "production-ready", "N7 complete", "N8 authored", "P7 sealed" — and judged each occurrence as overclaim vs. correctly-negated / candidate / request / attributed-quote.
1. Token-by-token findings
| Token | Occurrences | Context | Overclaim? |
|---|---|---|---|
| approved / approval | owner-decision-packet (options), master report, ledger | Always future/conditional: "owner picks an option", "blueprint approval = owner decision NOT granted", "no blueprint approval claimed" | ❌ No — correctly framed as un-granted |
| sealed / seal | n7/n8/p7, owner-decision-packet, ledger, current-state | Always candidate/request/conditional: "becomes sealed (Option 2)", "until Codex authors", "no sealed value", codex_sealed_values_present:false |
❌ No — correctly negated |
| seal-ready / "technically seal-ready" | owner-decision-packet §1, (source: Codex V3 §11) | Attributed quote of Codex's own words; means engineering-ready-for-seal, not "sealed" | ❌ No — attributed, accurate |
| authorized … seal step | n8 §2 (quoting Codex V3 §8) | Attributed quote: "sufficient … to move to the authorized Codex/owner seal step" — describes the next step, not a completed act | ❌ No — attributed |
| authorized implementation | — | NOT present. Implementation is consistently "NOT authorized / NOT started" | ❌ Absent |
| production-ready | — | NOT present anywhere in the closure docs | ❌ Absent |
| N7 complete | — | NOT present. N7 = BLOCKED_NEEDS_SEALED_INPUTS, A1–A6 missing |
❌ Absent |
| N8 authored | — | NOT present. N8 = "T1 cannot author", CODEX_ONLY | ❌ Absent |
| P7 sealed | — | NOT present. P7 = "candidate until Codex authors P7 seal" | ❌ Absent |
READY (in FIX7_AUTHORITY_CLOSURE_PACKET_READY) |
master/checkpoint/current-state status | Means packet ready for routing, explicitly NOT "sealed/approved/implemented" | ❌ No — scoped to packet readiness |
2. Discipline markers present (positive evidence of non-overclaim)
codex_sealed_values_present: false— present in N7 json and asserted in N8.rehearsal_only: true— N7 json.- Explicit "T1 cannot author this seal" — N8 §4.
- "T1 asserts reproducibility, not authority" — P7 §4.
- "T1 has NOT approved anything … CANNOT do so" — N7 §1.
- Every MISSING field carries
MISSING_AUTHORITY_INPUT+ an exact actor. - Master report §4 "this packet contains no sealed value."
3. Anti-overclaim verdict
PASS — no overclaim text found; nothing to patch. Every instance of an authority-loaded word is either (a) explicitly negated, (b) marked candidate/request/rehearsal, or (c) an attributed quote of Codex's own characterization. The packet does not claim any approval, seal, authorization, or production-readiness it does not hold. No safe T1 fix is required on overclaim grounds.